Authors : R. Sharmila; Dr. C. Pitchai

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 2 - February

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/55hf9vnw

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/bdhsddk5

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26feb666

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : Agricultural Producers’ Cooperative Marketing Societies (APCMS) play a vital role in improving the economic well-being of farmers by ensuring collective marketing, fair price realization, and reducing the influence of intermediaries. This paper examines the economic role of cooperative marketing societies in Tamil Nadu, focusing on their impact on member farmers’ income, market access, and participation in value-added activities. The study uses both primary and secondary data collected from selected members of cooperative marketing societies. Descriptive statistics, percentage analysis, and ranking methods were employed to assess members’ economic benefits and perceptions. The study finds that cooperative societies contribute significantly to stabilizing farm income through collective sales, procurement services, and access to market information. Members associated with well-functioning cooperatives reported higher price realization, reduced transaction costs, and better access to credit and storage facilities. Additionally, societies engaged in processing and value addition activities such as turmeric polishing, groundnut oil extraction, and pulses grading created local employment and enhanced rural income. However, the research also identifies challenges, including inadequate working capital, delayed payment cycles, and insufficient modernization of infrastructure. Strengthening management efficiency, promoting digital record-keeping, and enhancing member awareness could improve the financial sustainability of these societies. The study concludes that Agricultural Producers’ Cooperative Marketing Societies serve as essential institutions for inclusive rural economic growth and continue to play a crucial role in achieving equitable agricultural marketing in Tamil Nadu.

Keywords : Cooperative Marketing, Agricultural Economics, Member Participation, Value Addition, Tamil Nadu, Farmers’ Income.

References :

1. Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare. (2023). Agricultural Infrastructure Fund (AIF): Operational Guidelines. Government of India. https://agrinfra.dac.gov.in
2.  Government of India. (2025). National Cooperative Policy (Draft). Ministry of Cooperation, Press Information Bureau (PIB). https://pib.gov.in
3.  Kumar, R., & Singh, S. (2022). Digital transformation in agricultural cooperatives: A pathway to inclusive growth. Indian Journal of Agricultural Marketing, 36(2), 45–58.
4.  National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD). (2024). Refinance schemes for cooperative banks. NABARD Publications. https://www.nabard.org
5.  Rajendran, M., & Chandrasekar, S. (2021). Role of Agricultural Producer Cooperatives in strengthening the turmeric value chain in Tamil Nadu. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76(3), 321–334.
6. Sahoo, D., & Mishra, P. (2023). Financial constraints and working capital management in agricultural cooperatives. Journal of Rural Development, 42(1), 67–82.
7. Sharma, P., & Joshi, R. (2022). Digital marketing platforms and e-tendering in Indian agriculture: Challenges and opportunities. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 12(4), 155–168.
8.  Singh, K., & Gupta, N. (2020). Strengthening agricultural marketing infrastructure through public–private partnerships. Economic Affairs, 65(2), 239–246. https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.2.2020.19
9. World Bank. (2023). Digital agriculture in South Asia: Opportunities for inclusive rural transformation. The World Bank Group. https://www.worldbank.org
10. Yadav, R. K., & Meena, H. (2021). Institutional reforms in cooperative marketing societies in India: A policy perspective. Indian Cooperative Review, 58(4), 14–27.