Authors : Janvière Mugoragoze; Dr. Wabala Samuel; Tunezerwe Emmanuel

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 5 - May

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/zd4b38dm

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25May113

Google Scholar

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 15 to 20 days to display the article.

Abstract : A common cause of project failure is the inadequate involvement of key stakeholders, leading to poor communication, mistrust, and a lack of support from those most affected by the project. This study examines the impact of stakeholder participation on the performance of the Poverty Alleviation Coalition (PAC) Project implemented by Caritas Rwanda at Nyabiheke Refugee Camp in Gatsibo District, Rwanda. Drawing on several theories, including stakeholder theory, social exchange theory, and communicative action theory, the study employs a survey questionnaire to collect primary data from 245 respondents out of a targeted 247, consisting of staff, project partners, and beneficiaries. The research applies quantitative methods, using descriptive statistics and multiple regression analysis via SPSS to examine the correlation between variables such as stakeholder salience, risk appetite, communication, and consultation with the performance of the PAC project. The findings reveal a strong positive correlation between stakeholder salience, communication, consultation, and project performance. However, no significant effect was found for stakeholder risk appetite. Additionally, issues such as high stakeholder urgency causing delays, lack of communication about project direction and risks, and insufficient consultation with beneficiaries were identified, all contributing to underperformance. The study recommends that Caritas Rwanda and project managers improve stakeholder communication and consultation throughout all project phases to enhance stakeholder engagement and ensure better project outcomes.

References :

1. Chakraborty. (2022). Risk Appetite in India. The Management Accountant Journal, 4.
2. Derek&Kerryn. (2023). What Is Research Methodology? Gradcoach, 20.
3. ElGohary, S. a. (2020). Public–private partnerships (PPPs) in smart infrastructure projects: the role of stakeholders. HBRC Journal, 317-333.
4. Enock, Mike & Wanjala. (2020). Moderating Role of Stakeholders Attributes on Implementation of Rural Electrification Projects in Kenya. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 18.
5. Fraussen, Albareda& Braun. (2020). Conceptualizing consultation approaches: identifying combinations of consultation tools and analyzing their implications for stakeholder diversity. Springer Link, 473–493.
6. Gai et al. (2018). The concept of community poverty reduction in coastal area of Surabaya based on sustainable livelihood approach. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 11.
7. GGI. (2024, March 16). The Fight Against Poverty: How to Identify and Engage Key Stakeholders. From graygroupintl.com: https://www.graygroupintl.com/blog/fight-against-poverty
8. GOR. (2018). Public Private Partnerships guidelines. Kigali: GoR-Official gazette.
9. Health, I. f. (2008). Sample size and power. Institute for work and Health , 25-48.
10. Hussein, H. (2022). Interview method: Principle of social research methodology. Journal of innovative Research, 207–219.
11. ILO. (2021). Workshop for developing emerging contractors in Rwanda. Kigali: MIFOTRA.
12. Ishimwe, M. B. (2019). Impact Of Community Participation On Sustainability Of Water And Sanitation Projects In Rural Areas. Case Study Of Musanze District, Northern Province Of Rwanda. Pan-African University Repository, 80.
13. Isimbi, N. M. (2023). Project Management landscape in Rwanda. issuu.inc, 4-5.
14. Kothari, C. (2004). Research methodology : methods & techniques. New Delhi: New Age International (P) Ltd.
15. Lakens, D. (2022). Sample Size Justification . Society for Improving psychology Science, 20.
16. Luhombo, Mukanzi & Anyanje. (2019). INFLUENCE OF STAKEHOLDER COMMUNICATION ON SUSTAINABILITY OF SCPS IN TVETS IN WESTERN KENYA. International Academic Journal of Information Sciences and Project Management , 1-11.
17. Makarchuk et al. (2023). FORMATION OF THE SYSTEM OF INTEGRATED RISK APPETITE MANAGEMENT DURING IT PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 114.
18. Malla. (2022). Research methodology-Lecture note. Telangana State-India: Malla Reddy College of Engineering and Technology.
19. NOAA. (2020). Introduction to Stakeholder participation from NOAA. Boston: NOAA.
20. Nyanga. (2021). The importance of structured communication for effective stakeholder management of construction projects in the Cape metropolis,South Africa. Cape Peninsula University of Technology Archives, 12.
21. OAG. (2022, June 30). Annual Auditor general REPORT-Rwanda. Kigali: OAG. From oag.gov.rw:
22. OECD. (2019). Stakehoders participation as a pillar of open Government. Leeds: OECD Library.
23. O'Leary, Z. (2004). The Essential Guide to Doing Research. Academia, -.
24. Pirozzi, M. (2019). Stakeholders, who are they? PM World Journal, 10.
25. Shahid Iqbal et al. (2015). Risk management in construction projects. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 65-78.
26. Tebebu. (2019). Assessing internal project stakeholder communication practice: the case of Addis Ababa chamber of commerce and sectorial association (AACCSA) projects. Addis Abeba Repository Journal, 54.
27. Ullah et al. (2021). Identification of Factors Affecting Risk Appetite of Organizations in Selection of Mega Construction Projects. Construction Management – Future Innovations, Methods, Techniques and Technologies), 12.
28. Yejun. (2023). Stakeholder salience in project management. Sciences Review, 5.
29. Yongabo& Devrim. (2021). Emergence of an agriculture innovation system in Rwanda: Stakeholders and policies as points of departure. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration , 12.
30. Zevalkink, J. (2021). Observation method. Journal of innovative Research, 6.