Authors : Dr. John Motsamai Modise

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 7 - July

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/5678knts

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/24xmdz7s

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUL1101

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : This research delves into the critical issues of crime reduction and police service improvement in South Africa. South Africa faces a significant challenge: high crime rates, particularly violent crime and gender-based violence. This undermines public safety and necessitates a multifaceted approach to achieve a safer society. This research explores evidence-based strategies for crime reduction and police service improvement within the South African context. Main Topics: Crime reduction strategies we examine how evidence-based policing, situational crime prevention, and social crime prevention can be adapted and implemented effectively in South Africa. Strengthening the South African Police Service (SAPS): We analyze how to enhance the SAPS through improved resource allocation, specialized training programs, and a focus on community policing and trust- building. Key Arguments crime reduction requires a multi-pronged approach that addresses both criminal behavior and the underlying social factors that contribute to it. Evidence-based policing, situational crime prevention, and social crime prevention offer promising strategies when tailored to the specific contexts of South African communities. Strengthening the SAPS through improved resources, training, and community relations is crucial for building trust and enhancing public safety. Approach This research employs a literature review approach, analyzing existing research on crime reduction strategies, police service improvement, and the South African context. Significance this research has the potential to inform policymakers, police leadership, community organizations, and future research endeavors. By identifying effective strategies and outlining practical recommendations, this research can contribute to a safer and more just South Africa. Audience this research is targeted towards a broad audience, including Policymakers involved in developing and implementing crime reduction strategies. Police leadership seeking to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the SAPS. Community organizations working to address crime and promote safety in their neighborhoods. Researchers interested in furthering the understanding of crime and policing in South Africa. Conclusion by critically examining crime reduction strategies and exploring ways to strengthen the SAPS, this research lays the groundwork for a safer and more secure South Africa. Implementing the recommendations outlined here can contribute to a future where all South Africans feel safe and secure in their communities.

Keywords : Evidence-Based Policing, Situational Crime Prevention, Social Crime Prevention, Crime Hotspots, Crime Prevention Strategies, Gender-Based Violence (GBV).

References :

1. Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-608.
2. Cornish, D., & Clarke, R. V. (1986). The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending. Springer-Verlag.
3. Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. L. (1982). Broken windows: The police and neighborhood safety. Atlantic Monthly, 249(3), 29-38.
4. Deacon, R., & Burger, J. (2011). The nature and extent of crime in South Africa. Crime Science Review, 26(2), 117-134. (Consider this as an alternative if Nieuwoudt, M. (2017).
5. Louw, A., & Shaw, M. (2011). Crime and policing in South Africa. Routledge.
6. Edig, H. J., & Steyn, D. W. (2013). Crime trends in South Africa: A critical analysis of police statistics. South African Crime Quarterly, (45), 1-14.
7. Maguire, M., & Bennett, T. (1994). The measurement of crime. University College London Press.
8. Norman, A., & Davies, M. (2000). Design for everyday life. Springer Science & Business Media.
9. Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level: Why greater equality makes societies stronger. Penguin Books.
10. Teplin, L. (2014). Out of sight, out of mind: The unseen impact of incarceration on public health. Health Affairs, 33(2), 242-249.
11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343419771_Health_Implications_of_Incarceration_and_Reentry_on_Returning_Citizens_A_Qualitative_Examination_of_Black_Men's_Experiences_in_a_Northeastern_City.
12. Lipsey, M. W., & Cordray, D. S. (2003). Scaling up promising interventions for crime and delinquency. The National Academies Press.
13. Petersilia, J. (2003). Des desistance from crime: Opportunities and interventions. Cambridge University Press.
14. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for evaluating social programs. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
15. Gottfredson, D. C., Hirschi, T., & Hindelang, M. J. (2011). A general theory of crime. Routledge.
16. Lum, C., & Koper, R. (2016). The effectiveness of police place-based interventions for crime reduction: A systematic review. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 53(1), 10-40.
17. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/CL2.174.
18. Farrington, D. P., & Welsh, B. N. (2002). Fast tracking delinquency prevention. Sprinter Verlag.
19. Sherman, L. W., Gartin, P. R., & Rutgers, D. W. (2020). Focused deterrence for violent crime: A review of recent evidence. Campbell Systematic Reviews.
20. https://www.campbellcollaboration.org/better-evidence/focused-deterrence-strategies-effects-on-crime.html.
21. Clarke, R. V., & Cornish, D. B. (1973). Deterrence of crime by physical environment. HMSO.
22. Pease, K. (1998). Targeting repeat burglary victims: Lessons from a randomized controlled trial in Manchester. British Journal of Criminology, 38(4), 571-588.
23. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Graham_Farrell/publication/272819194_Repeat_Victimization/links/54ef91300cf2432ba656e6a7.pdf.
24. Aos, S., McGuire, J., & Rowe, D. (2006). Meta-analysis of reentry programs for offenders. The National Academies Press.
25. https://www.theiacp.org/resources/de-escalation-use-of-force.
26. Burrell, B., MacKenzie, D., & Hickman, L. (2014). A systematic review of intensive supervision programs for adult offenders. The Campbell Collaboration.
27. https://www.uc.edu/content/dam/uc/ccjr/docs/articles/RiskPrinciple.pdf
28. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1998). How effective are intensive supervision programs for high-risk offenders? Crime and Delinquency, 44(3), 356-372.
29. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/effective-intervention-serious-juvenile-offenders.
30. Engel, R. (2000). Police use of force: An invisible variable in studies of legal interventions. Law and Society Review, 34(4), 853-892.
31. es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cibercriminolog%C3%Ada.
32. discovery.ucl.ac.uk/20059/1/Tompson_&_Townsle.
33. network.bepress.com/explore/social-and-behave.