Authors :
Gayathri S.; Dr. P. Padmavathi; Chandramathi K.
Volume/Issue :
Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 6 - June
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/3zr2ay32
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/35uxvd6e
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUN1914
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Background:
Oral mucositis is the commonplace problem of mass
cancers’ chemotherapy. It begins five-10 days after the
initiation of chemotherapy and lasts 7-14 days.
Chemotherapy precipitated oral mucositis reasons the
mucosal lining of the oral to atrophy and break down,
forming ulcers. The take a look at is to evaluate the
effectiveness of turmeric oral rinse and saline oral rinse
on patents with chemotherapy precipitated oral mucositis
in determined on sanatorium.
Design:
Casual research design was selected for the study;
inclusion criteria were selected by non-probability
sampling technique.
Selection criteria: the inclusion criteria included Patients
under chemo therapy with the age class above age class of
20-65 years and both the gender.
Methods:
A study was conducted patients with oral mucositis
among patients receiving chemotherapy. The assessment
tools were used national cancer institute oral mucositis
grading scale.
Results:
From the findings of the have a look at, it can be
concluded that the overall vicinity smart comparison
among intervention class I and II imply percent score for
pretest became 88%, revealing the difference of 59% in
intervention class 47 % for numerical pain assessment
scale. tremendously full-size variations had been
discovered in experimental organization I. but, in
treatment group II pretest rating become 25% while in
submit-test it was sixty-one% revealing the difference of
36%. It depicts that the turmeric oral rinse was greater
effective than saline oral rinse in lowering the extent of
oral mucositis among affected person receiving chemo
remedy. Paired t check score become 14.43 and 8.52 in
intervention class I and II, when as compared to desk
value (2.15) each are elevated. This suggests that there has
been an effectiveness between submit test score of degree
of oral mucositis among affected person receiving chemo
therapy in intervention class I and II. paired and unpaired
“t” check confirmed, there was a huge effectiveness of
turmeric oral rinse is greater powerful than saline oral
rinse on oral mucositis among patient receiving
chemotherapy. Chi rectangular test confirmed handiest
length of cancer (p>0.05) in both the class up and the
boxcar variable haven't any good-sized association with
the submit-check score of stage of oral mucositis in both
intervention class I and II. Conclusion: The findings
found out that imply publish check scores was 34.24±1.28
in intervention class I, in intervention class II publish-
check rating changed into 24.07± 1.27 revealing the
distinction of 36%. It depicts that the turmeric oral rinse
became greater powerful than saline m oral outh rinse in
lowering the extent of oral mucositis among patient taking
chemotherapy.
Keywords :
Effectiveness, Turmeric Oral Rinse, Saline Oral Rinse, Oral Mucositis.
References :
- Adrianne Dill Linton, (2007). Introduction to Medical Surgical Nursing (4 Eds). Philadelphia: Elsevier Science Limited.
- Alligard, M R (2002), “Nursing Theorists and their Work”, (5 Eds.,) Mosby company, Philadelphia
- Basavanthappa.B. T, (2003). Medical Surgical Nursing (1 Eds). New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
- Basavanthappa. (2007). Nursing Research, (2 Eds). New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.
- Basavanthappa, B.T. (2009). Nursing Theories, (2 Eds), New Delhi. Jaypee Brothers’ publishers private limited.
- 6.Beverely Witter Du Gas. (2006). Introduction to patient care A comprehensive approach to nursing, (4 Eds). Philadelphia: Saunders an Imprint of Elsevier publishers.
- BraunWald,E.(2001). Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine, (15 Eds) Vol.-1, New York: McGraw-Hill Medical Publishing Division.
- Brenda G. Bae, Suzanne C. Smeltzer, (2004). Brunner &Siddharth’s Textbook of Medical Surgical Nursing (10 Eds). Philadelphia:
- Lippincott Raven Publishers Denise Polit, Cheryl Tatano Beck. (2006). Nursing Research Principles and Methods, (7 Eds.,), New Delhi: Published by Wolters Kluwer Health (India)
- Denise Polit, Cheryl Tatano Beck. (2006). Nursing Research Principles and Methods, (7 Eds.,), New Delhi: Published by Wolters Kluwer Health (India)
- Dirksenl Heilkemper. Lewis, (2004). Medical Surgical Nursing (6Eds). St. Louis: Mosby Publishers
- Elhart & firsich. (1994). Scientific Principles in Nursing, (8 Eds) London: C.V. Mosby. Mosby. Mosby Publications.
- Joyce M Black, (2005). Medical surgical nursing, vol II, (7EdS). New Delhi; Elsevier (p) ltd.
- Julia.B (1998) “Nursing Theories, the Base for Professional Nursing Practice”, (3 Eds). California, Prentice hallPvt. Ltd.
Background:
Oral mucositis is the commonplace problem of mass
cancers’ chemotherapy. It begins five-10 days after the
initiation of chemotherapy and lasts 7-14 days.
Chemotherapy precipitated oral mucositis reasons the
mucosal lining of the oral to atrophy and break down,
forming ulcers. The take a look at is to evaluate the
effectiveness of turmeric oral rinse and saline oral rinse
on patents with chemotherapy precipitated oral mucositis
in determined on sanatorium.
Design:
Casual research design was selected for the study;
inclusion criteria were selected by non-probability
sampling technique.
Selection criteria: the inclusion criteria included Patients
under chemo therapy with the age class above age class of
20-65 years and both the gender.
Methods:
A study was conducted patients with oral mucositis
among patients receiving chemotherapy. The assessment
tools were used national cancer institute oral mucositis
grading scale.
Results:
From the findings of the have a look at, it can be
concluded that the overall vicinity smart comparison
among intervention class I and II imply percent score for
pretest became 88%, revealing the difference of 59% in
intervention class 47 % for numerical pain assessment
scale. tremendously full-size variations had been
discovered in experimental organization I. but, in
treatment group II pretest rating become 25% while in
submit-test it was sixty-one% revealing the difference of
36%. It depicts that the turmeric oral rinse was greater
effective than saline oral rinse in lowering the extent of
oral mucositis among affected person receiving chemo
remedy. Paired t check score become 14.43 and 8.52 in
intervention class I and II, when as compared to desk
value (2.15) each are elevated. This suggests that there has
been an effectiveness between submit test score of degree
of oral mucositis among affected person receiving chemo
therapy in intervention class I and II. paired and unpaired
“t” check confirmed, there was a huge effectiveness of
turmeric oral rinse is greater powerful than saline oral
rinse on oral mucositis among patient receiving
chemotherapy. Chi rectangular test confirmed handiest
length of cancer (p>0.05) in both the class up and the
boxcar variable haven't any good-sized association with
the submit-check score of stage of oral mucositis in both
intervention class I and II. Conclusion: The findings
found out that imply publish check scores was 34.24±1.28
in intervention class I, in intervention class II publish-
check rating changed into 24.07± 1.27 revealing the
distinction of 36%. It depicts that the turmeric oral rinse
became greater powerful than saline m oral outh rinse in
lowering the extent of oral mucositis among patient taking
chemotherapy.
Keywords :
Effectiveness, Turmeric Oral Rinse, Saline Oral Rinse, Oral Mucositis.
