⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



Effects of Application of some Water Harvesting Techniques on Range Attributes in Abuelghor Area, North Kordofan, Sudan


Authors : Salwa Abdurrahman Hamad; Samia Salih Shuaib Ibrahim; Musa Ahmed Musa Tibin; Alsamani Mohamed Mohamed Ali; Jumaa Barram Jadalla

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 4 - April


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/4wffdxbk

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/4a3825tt

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26apr1245

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : This study was conducted on rangeland of Abuelghor area, Sheikan locality, North Kordofan State, Sudan with the objective of studying the effects of applying some rainwater harvesting techniques on range plants composition, frequency, density, and biomass production. Four plots were set for this purpose. The first one (I) was protected and left without applying any technique. The second one (II) was divided by straight line furrows against surface water runoff while the third plot (III) was covered with alternating crescent shape ditches and the fourth (IV) was divided into plots of 42 meters. Line transect method was used for range inventory in randomly selected sites. The experiment was set as a complete randomized design and the data was analyzed using analysis of variance, and the differences among means were detected with least significance test (LSD). The results indicated no significant (>0.05) differences among treatments in plant composition and frequency. Ground cover showed significant differences (P<0.05) among treatment means where plot IV showed the highest ground cover followed by II and III that were similar in ground cover. Treat (I) had the lowest ground cover. The results of density were similar to the results as that were recorded for ground cover. Biomass was higher in treatment III and IV followed by treatment II while treatment I had the lowest biomass production. It was concluded that water harvesting could improve ground cover, density and biomass production with some techniques having greater effects than others. It is recommended that crescent shapes be used since their effects were similar to those in plot IV upon dividing rangeland into plots because it showed being lower cost in establishing it

Keywords : Rangeland Improvement, Rainwater Harvesting, Biomass Production.

References :

  1. Musa, A. Shasha, (2001). African green belt. Republic of Sudan.
  2. Abdelrahim O Abdelrahim, Nancy I Abdalla(). Assessment of rangelands in semi-arid areas of Sudan - south kordofan state (eldebeibat area), ARPN journal of science and technology. 2015; 5(2): 117-124.
  3. Abdelsalam, M. I., 2019. Effect of Cultivation Practices on Al-Safari (Crotalaria senegalensis) for Domestication as Forage Plant. SUST Journal of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences (SJAVS). (20) 2. 101-107
  4. ARC, (Agricultural Research Corporation). Annual report of range and forage research program, zalingie  research station, zalingei, Sudan. Aug 2015.
  5. Le Houèrou, H.N. and C.H. Hoste, 1977. Rangeland Production and Annual Rainfall Relations in the Mediterranean Basin and In the African Sahelian and Sudanian Zones. Journal Of Range Management, 30: 181-189.
  1. O’Connor, T.G. 1991. Influence of rainfall and grazing on the compositional change of the herbaceous layer of a sandveld savanna. J. Grassl. Soc. South Africa 8:103–109.
  2. OCHA, 2013. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. March 14 2013, 2:21.34 PM. http://www.unocha.org/sudan/mapsgraphics/administrative-maps
  3. Parker, K. W. (1951). A method for measuring trend range condition on national forest range. Administrative studies, U. S. Department of Agriculture, forest service, Washington, D. C. 26 pp.
  4. Rebeca, V. M. Eusebio, V. R. Klavdia, O. Luis, H. S. and Miguel, A. D (2011). Soil Erosion Processes in Semi arid Areas: The Importance of Native Vegetation. Soil Erosion Studies. Edited by Dr. Danilo Godone. ISBN 978-953-307-710-9.
  5. RPA, 2011. Range and Pasture Administration, 2011. The situation of fodder source in Sudan. Range and Pasture  P.O Box 2513. Sudan. 
  1. Salih, E. M, Nimir, O. A, Kobbail, A. A, Elkhalifa, A. A, Abdelsalam, M. I and Lazim, A. M. M., 2020. Performance of Some Selected Forage Plant Species in Sandy Loam Soil at Esunnot Area of Western Kordofan State, Sudan. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Publications (IJMRAP), 3 (5), 1- 4
  2. Stoddart, L. A., D. Smith, and Box, T. W. Box, (1975). Range Management. 3rd  Ed, Mc Graw – Hill Book Company, Inc, NY
  3. ARC, Agricultural Research (Corporation,2014).Range biodiversity and Rangelands of Sudan, ARC Sudan (presented by Fatima Sadig Almahadi in a workshop)
  4. Range and Aministration, in Kordofan (2015). Annual range inventory and determination feed banalce of  North Kordofan state. Ministry of Production and Economic resources

This study was conducted on rangeland of Abuelghor area, Sheikan locality, North Kordofan State, Sudan with the objective of studying the effects of applying some rainwater harvesting techniques on range plants composition, frequency, density, and biomass production. Four plots were set for this purpose. The first one (I) was protected and left without applying any technique. The second one (II) was divided by straight line furrows against surface water runoff while the third plot (III) was covered with alternating crescent shape ditches and the fourth (IV) was divided into plots of 42 meters. Line transect method was used for range inventory in randomly selected sites. The experiment was set as a complete randomized design and the data was analyzed using analysis of variance, and the differences among means were detected with least significance test (LSD). The results indicated no significant (>0.05) differences among treatments in plant composition and frequency. Ground cover showed significant differences (P<0.05) among treatment means where plot IV showed the highest ground cover followed by II and III that were similar in ground cover. Treat (I) had the lowest ground cover. The results of density were similar to the results as that were recorded for ground cover. Biomass was higher in treatment III and IV followed by treatment II while treatment I had the lowest biomass production. It was concluded that water harvesting could improve ground cover, density and biomass production with some techniques having greater effects than others. It is recommended that crescent shapes be used since their effects were similar to those in plot IV upon dividing rangeland into plots because it showed being lower cost in establishing it

Keywords : Rangeland Improvement, Rainwater Harvesting, Biomass Production.

Paper Submission Last Date
31 - May - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe