Authors : Revathi E

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 7 - July

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3e9f3n4v

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/nhtmm88c

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUL1839

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : Background:- Plastic is the general common term for extensive variety of artificial or semi artificial natural amorphous stable substances derived from oil and herbal fuel. . Plastic is utilized on a daily basis in the sector. Plastic is utilized on a daily basis worldwide.. The hazards of plastic wastes are numerous due to the plastic wastes the human, animal, environment are affected. Methods This study was conducted using a quantitative evaluation perspective, which involved a pre-experimental one- group pretest and post-test design.. The study was conducted in the rural area of Manickampalayam. In order to identify the pattern, a non-probability convenient sampling method. approach was utilized for a sample size of 50 rural people. The study participants were provided with an explanation of its nature and oral consent was obtained. Demographic variables were used to gather the data, which included age, sex, training, profession, earnings, faith, type of circle of relatives, marital popularity, and dependent questionnaires. The post was changed to be conducted on the 7th day. The facts have been scrutinized. Results: A significant difference has emerged during the understanding phase of putting up a test. The structured teaching program was effective among rural people due to the calculated paired 'T' test value 8.891 being significantly The table value of 1.96 is not as high as it should be at p < 0.05.. The acceptance of hypothesis H1 was granted.

Keywords : Effectiveness, Hazards, Plastic Waste, Rural People.

References :

1. Basvanthappa B.T. (1998), Community health nursing, First edition, New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers.
2. Basvanthappa B.T. (2003), Nursing Research, First edition, New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers.
3. Caroline Bunker Rosdahl, Mary T.Kowalski. (2008), Textbook of basic nursing . Ninth edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
4. Christian. P. J. And Kenny. J. W. (1990), Nursing process application of conceptual models, Third edition ,Philidelphia: Mosby company.
5. Hiremath. (2006), Essentials of community medicine – A practical approach , First edition ,New Delhi :Jaypee Brothers.
6. Janice.E. Witchcock et.al.(2010 ), Community health nursing: caring in action , First edition, Toronto: Nelson education.
7. Julia B. George (1996), Nursing Theories, Third edition, New Jersey: Prentice Hal Company. 8. Kasthuri S R, (1999), An Introduction to Community Health, Fifth edition, New Delhi: B.I. Publications Pvt. Ltd.
8. Kothari.C.R. (2000), Research Methodology – Methods and Techniques,First edition, New Delhi : Vishwa Prakashan (P) Ltd.
9. Mahajan. B.K. and Gupta, M.C. (1995), The text book of preventive and social medicine, Second edition , New Delhi :Jaypee Brothers.
10. Mary Jo.(2008), Community health nursing advocacy for population health , Fifth edition ,Upper saddle River , Pearson Prentice hall. 68
11. Naomi E. Ervin. (2002), Advanced community health nursing practice; population – focused care, First edition, Upper saddle River ,  N.J; Prentice hall.
12. Park.K. (2009), Textbook of preventive and social medicine, Jabalpur;  Bhanot Banarsidas. 14. Polit and Hungler .  (1999), Nursing research principles and methods, Sixth edition . Philadelphia. Lippincott.