Authors : Dr. Sharath kumar Shetty; Dr. Revanth S Soonthodu; Dr. Aashiq Iqbal

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 9 - September

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/y9w42f7y

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/msdscn68

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25sep882

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

Abstract : Orthodontic elastics have long been employed as adjuncts in fixed orthodontic therapy to apply inter-arch or intra-arch forces for correcting malocclusions. These small yet potent tools offer clinicians a simple, cost-effective, and patient-manageable means of exerting continuous forces to guide tooth movement . Their use has been particularly pivotal in the correction of Class II and Class III discrepancies, midline deviations, and occlusal settling. This comprehensive review highlights the classification ,evolution of elastics in orthodontics, emphasizing the transition from natural rubber to synthetic elastomers, clinical uses and biocompatibility. Synthetic materials address limitations such as force degradation and allergic reactions associated with natural rubber. The study also discusses the introduction of fluoride-releasing elastomeric ligatures to reduce plaque retention and the risk of demineralization. However, it notes that elastics, unlike NiTi springs, do not maintain a continuous force over time, which can impact treatment efficacy.

References :

1. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. 6th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2018.
2. Huang R, Keim RG, Mohan M. Efficiency of orthodontic elastics in Class II correction: A systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015;148(6):944–952.
3. Nattrass C, Sandy JR. Adult orthodontics—a review. Br J Orthod. 1995;22(4):331–337.
4. Baty DL, Volz JE, Ferguson DJ. Comparative study of latex and nonlatex orthodontic elastics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;105(5):469–475.
5. Kersey ML, Glover KE, Heo G, Raboud D, Major PW. A comparison of dynamic and static testing of latex and non-latex orthodontic elastics. Angle Orthod. 2003;73(2):181–186.
6. Pithon MM, Oliveira DD, Ruellas AC. Forces released by different elastics used in orthodontics. Dent Press J Orthod. 2012;17(5):96–100.
7. Wong AK. Orthodontic elastic materials. Angle Orthod. 1976;46(3):196–205.
8. Ash JL, Nikolai RJ. Relaxation of orthodontic elastomeric chains and modules in vitro and in vivo. J Dent Res. 1978;57(5–6):685–690.
9. Davidovitch Z, Krishnan V. The biological mechanisms of tooth movement. In: Graber LW, Vanarsdall RL, Vig KWL, editors. Orthodontics: Current Principles and Techniques. 5th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2012. p. 307–349.
10. Lopez J. Force decay of orthodontic elastomeric chains: A literature review. Eur J Orthod. 2013;35(5):651–656.
11. Fernandes DJ, Viana G, Mendes AM. Effects of aging and pH variations on the mechanical properties of orthodontic elastomeric chains. Dental Press J Orthod. 2015;20(4):52–58.
12. Lai YL, Tsai CM. Comparative study of the mechanical properties of orthodontic elastics from different manufacturers. J Dent Sci. 2015;10(1):1–7.
13. Taloumis LJ, Smith TM, Hondrum SO, Lorton L. Force decay and modulus of elasticity of latex and non-latex orthodontic elastics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111(1):1–11.
14. Jadhav M, Shetty V, Kshirsagar P. Shape memory polymers in orthodontics: An overview. Prog Polym Sci. 2021;115:101388.
15. Almog M, Flores-Mir C, Heo G, Major PW. Review of compliance monitoring devices for orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130(4):491–496.
16. Weir T. Clear aligners in orthodontic treatment. Aust Dent J. 2017;62(Suppl 1):58–62.
17. Li X, Huang X, Tang Y, Zhou Y. Effect of nano-silica reinforcement on mechanical properties of orthodontic elastics. Dent Mater J. 2021;40(3):518–524.
18. Cunningham K, Rahimi H, Lyons K, Bondemark L. Smart sensors to assess interarch elastic wear: Pilot study. J Dent Biomech. 2022;13(2):1–7.
19. Cozzani M, Ragazzini G, Delucchi A, Mutinelli S. Vertical control in Class II elastics: a finite element study. Prog Orthod. 2014;15:53.
20. Filho RM, Maia L, Andrade I. Comparative efficiency of Class II elastics in extraction and non-extraction cases: A systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2020;42(1):61–69.
21. Johal A, Patel R. Interarch elastics: an overview and classification. J Orthod. 2007;34(3):162–165.
22. Jain A, Bansal A, Kumar S, Gupta V. Orthodontic elastics: A critical review. J Dent Med Sci. 2017;16(7):69–74.
23. Barlin KD, Parashar M, Karthik K. Newer materials in orthodontics—A review. J Orthod Res. 2019;7(3):155–160.
24. Ortho Technology Inc. Product specifications for latex and non-latex elastics [Internet]. Tampa, FL; 2021 [cited 2024 Sep 12]. Available from: https://www.orthotechnology.com
25. Kincheloe JE, Meier JA, Caputo AA. Force degradation of orthodontic elastics: A product comparison study. Am J Orthod. 1987;91(4):359–366.
26. Iwasaki LR, Beatty MW, Randall CJ. Clinical implications of force decay in elastics: review and case discussion. Angle Orthod. 2003;73(6):712–717.
27. Almasan OC, Baciut M, Bran S. Forces produced by different types of elastics and elastomeric chains. J Med Life. 2011;4(4):368–372.
28. Kwon M, Lee J, Lee S, Kim S. Development of biodegradable orthodontic elastics using natural polymers. Dent Mater J. 2022;41(2):245–252.
29. McNamara JA, Brudon WL. Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. Needham Press; 2001.
30. Yadav S, Upadhyay M, Joon R. Orthodontic biomechanics simplified. J Ind Orthod Soc. 2015;49(1):2–12.