Embedding “Practicalism” as an Intrinsic Constituent of the Philosophy of Science: Positioning “Practicalism” as an Essential Pre-Requisite for Rapid Scientific Progress


Authors : Sujay Rao Mandavilli

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 6 - June

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/4shmdkdx

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/bd5zjfjj

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUN893

Abstract : We begin this paper by reviewing various standard terminologies around the English word “practical”, and its derivatives such as practicalism, and practicality. We also define the English term pragmatism, and review the chief and core tenets of the pragmatic school of thought in philosophy, and the philosophy of science, as proposed by William James, John Dewey, Immanuel Kant and others. We also examine, and evaluate the principles, dynamics, and contours of the aforesaid pragmatic school of thought and lay bare its weaknesses, the chief one being that it is not entirely free from nerdism, and does not dedicate itself entirely to the cause of society, so that these can become the springboard for the creation of a new school of thought known as ‘practicalism’. Additionally, we also review the essence of various strands of the philosophy of science in general so that several components of various schools of philosophical thought can be imbued by this new school of thought. The doctrines of positivism, logical positivism, neopositivism, postpositivism, and antipositivism are also explored to the extent they have a bearing on our paper, besides the tenets of the proposed twenty-first century school of intellectualism. We do hope that this new approach and technique will catapult science to an altogether different league. We also then proceed to show why this approach is in keeping with our general philosophy of ‘the globalization of science’.

References :

  1. Agassi, Joseph (2013). The Very Idea of Modern Science: Francis Bacon and Robert Boyle. Springer. ISBN 978-94-007-5350-1
  2. Farrell, John (2006). "6: The Science of Suspicion". Paranoia and Modernity: Cervantes to Rousseau. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. ISBN 978-0-8014-7406-4.
  3. Godfrey-Smith, Peter (2003), Theory and Reality: An Introduction the Philosophy of Science, University of Chicago Press.
  4. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd. ed. Univ. of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-45804-5.
  5. Advocating Output Criteria based Scientific and Research Methodologies: why the Reliability of Scientific and Research Methods Must be Measured based on Output Criteria and Attributes Sujay Rao Mandavilli Institute for the Study of the Globalization of Science, IJISRT, August 2023
  6. Enunciating the Core principles of Twenty-first Century Historiography: Some additional extrapolations and inferences from our studies and observations on Historiography Sujay Rao Mandavilli ELK Asia Pacific Journal of Social Science (ISSN: 2394-9392) in Volume 2, Issue 4 July to September 2016
  7. Dewey, John (1900–1901), Lectures on Ethics 1900–1901, Donald F. Koch (ed.), Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL, 1991
  8. James, William (1909). The Meaning of Truth, A Sequel to 'Pragmatism'. New York: Longmans, Green, and Company
  9. Lundin, Roger (2006). From Nature to Experience: The American Search for Cultural Authority. Rowman & Littlefield
  10. Armenteros, Carolina. 2017. "The Counterrevolutionary Comte: Theorist of the Two Powers and Enthusiastic Medievalist." In The Anthem Companion to Auguste Comte, edited by Andrew Wernick, 91–116. London: Anthem
  11. Annan, Noel. 1959. The Curious Strength of Positivism in English Political Thought. London: Oxford University Press.
  12. Ardao, Arturo. 1963. "Assimilation and Transformation of Positivism in Latin America." Journal of the History of Ideas 24 (4):515–22.

We begin this paper by reviewing various standard terminologies around the English word “practical”, and its derivatives such as practicalism, and practicality. We also define the English term pragmatism, and review the chief and core tenets of the pragmatic school of thought in philosophy, and the philosophy of science, as proposed by William James, John Dewey, Immanuel Kant and others. We also examine, and evaluate the principles, dynamics, and contours of the aforesaid pragmatic school of thought and lay bare its weaknesses, the chief one being that it is not entirely free from nerdism, and does not dedicate itself entirely to the cause of society, so that these can become the springboard for the creation of a new school of thought known as ‘practicalism’. Additionally, we also review the essence of various strands of the philosophy of science in general so that several components of various schools of philosophical thought can be imbued by this new school of thought. The doctrines of positivism, logical positivism, neopositivism, postpositivism, and antipositivism are also explored to the extent they have a bearing on our paper, besides the tenets of the proposed twenty-first century school of intellectualism. We do hope that this new approach and technique will catapult science to an altogether different league. We also then proceed to show why this approach is in keeping with our general philosophy of ‘the globalization of science’.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe