Authors : Bello Isa B.; Ogunnaike Adekunle O.; Bambaboni Adekunle, S.; Obafemi A. Ibitoye

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 8 - August

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/34d5tf79

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/3r3y9t4r

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25aug453

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

Abstract : This study investigates how the design of building façades affects users’ emotions, comfort, and satisfaction in mid- rise office buildings in Abuja, Nigeria. Using a mixed-methods case-study approach, data were collected through structured surveys of office occupants (N≈100) and cross-case observational analysis of exemplar buildings. We focus on key façade parameters (materials, colour, patterns, orientation, and cultural motifs) and correlate them with user preferences and reported well-being. Survey results reveal strong positive feelings toward natural materials (wood, stone/brick) and light colour schemes, whereas glass and concrete elicited more neutral or negative reactions (Table 1). Orientation emerged as critical: 82% of respondents found front-facing facades (well-lit and shaded) “highly comfortable”, versus 61% reporting discomfort on rear- facing facades (Table 2). Culturally relevant design elements (local patterns, materials, shading) also boosted satisfaction, with ~70% of users reporting a “strong” positive effect (Table 3). These empirical findings align with contemporary studies in architectural psychology: for example, bright, cool-toned facades and ample fenestration are known to enhance positive affect and spaciousness, while biophilic elements (natural materials, greenery) improve mood and ease. In discussion, we synthesize our data with literature on tropical and sustainable design, emphasizing how climate-responsive features (shading, ventilation) and cultural identity in architecture foster comfort and a sense of belonging (see new Table 4). The results underscore that in Abuja’s hot, humid climate, façade design is not merely aesthetic but deeply influences thermal comfort, cognitive ease, and emotional well-being. We conclude with recommendations for integrating human-centred and context-sensitive façade strategies in tropical office design.

Keywords : Cultural Architecture, Emotional Response, Environmental Psychology, Façade Design, and Thermal Comfort.

References :

1. Afolabi, A. O., & Ibitoye, M. O. (2025). Biophilic architecture and urban façade performance in West African climates. Journal of Sustainable Urban Design, 12(1), 159181. https://doi.org/10.1016/jsud.2025.03.004
2. Afolabi, A. O., Ogunleye, D., & Owolabi, T. (2024). Thermal modulation through green façades in Lagos and Abuja: Field experiments and user perspectives. Energy and Built Environment, 5(2), 161172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbenv.2024.01.002
3. Ahmed, M. Y., & Alabi, B. (2021). Materiality and façade satisfaction: A perceptual study in Nigerian commercial buildings. International Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 8(1), 87102.
4. Akande, O. K., & Omotayo, T. (2022). Post-occupancy evaluation of thermal comfort in Nigerian office buildings. Energy Reports, 8, 11811192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.12.025
5. Aluko, A. A., & Adedayo, T. (2023). Reclaiming cultural identity in Nigerian office buildings: A façade typology analysis. Architectural Review Africa, 17(2), 95112.
6. Ayodele, I. A., & Musa, S. (2023). Climate responsiveness and user satisfaction in Abuja’s commercial architecture. Nigerian Journal of Architecture, 15(1), 2744.
7. Badamasi, I. G., & Yahaya, T. (2021). Shading strategies for improved thermal performance in tropical institutional buildings. Buildings, 11(9), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11090410
8. Bassey, E., & Adeyemo, F. O. (2024). Local material integration in Nigerian façades: Psychological implications and visual impact. African Journal of Architecture, 6(1), 1429.
9. Eboh, A., & Gimba, J. (2022). User perception of office façade design in Northern Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Design and Management, 10(3), 88103.
10. Hamza, I., Lawal, M. A., & Tanko, A. (2022). Daylight optimization through façade manipulation in Nigerian mid-rise buildings. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(5), 112125. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2022.2072380
11. Hashemi Kashani, A., Fadaei, M., & Fallah, R. (2023). Public preferences for façade patterns in urban streetscapes. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 12(1), 174187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2022.07.005
12. Ismail, Z. A., & Danjuma, I. (2021). Thermal comfort analysis of naturally ventilated offices in tropical Africa. Building and Environment, 202, 108014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108014
13. Kajjoba, A. D., Muwonge, I., & Ssewannyana, M. (2025). Review of passive cooling practices for commercial buildings in tropical Africa. Energy for Sustainable Development, 79, 110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2024.11.008
14. Mfon, S. E. (2023). The influence of architectural aesthetics on emotional response in Nigerian cities. Journal of African Built Environment, 9(1), 5872.
15. Mohammed, U., & Azeez, M. (2022). Urban façade transitions in Abuja: Between modernity and tradition. International Journal of Urban Design and Planning, 16(2), 142158.
16. Ogunnaike, O. O., Akinpelu, A. A., & Ojo, F. T. (2025). Façade design in Lagos: A case for contextual climate-conscious architecture. West African Journal of Architecture, 11(1), 6177.
17. Oludare, O. B., Nduka, I. C., & Abolade, O. O. (2021). User aesthetic preferences for façade materials and finishes in Nigerian universities. International Journal of Environmental Design, 7(2), 7082.
18. Oyelowo, I. T., & Egwuonwu, C. C. (2023). Emotional effects of architectural colour on building users: Insights from Nigeria. Colour Research & Application, 48(3), 345354. https://doi.org/10.1002/col.22810
19. Presti, P., Di Dio, C., Massaro, D., & Gallese, V. (2022). Affective responses to the experience of architectural spaces: A neuroscientific perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 844738. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.844738
20. Raheem, R. A., & Alayande, T. O. (2020). Post-occupancy assessment of façade types in Abuja’s business districts. Journal of Building Performance, 11(3), 5571.
21. Salihu, T. M., & Onu, E. (2024). Spatial perception and façade aesthetics in Abuja’s administrative buildings. Environment and Behavior, 56(2), 231251.
22. Shaibu, M. S., & Oluwaseun, A. O. (2022). Ventilated façades and psychological comfort in hot-humid environments. Sustainable Cities and Society, 86, 104210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104210
23. Usman, A. A., & Olatunji, T. O. (2023). User perception of architectural expression in Abuja’s evolving skyline. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 10(1), 4560.
24. Waziri, B. S., & Agbo, C. M. (2021). Assessing façade-user interaction in Nigerian public buildings. International Review of Architecture and Design, 19(4), 143158.
25. Zubairu, A. A., & Gana, A. A. (2023). Towards a climate-sensitive façade typology for Northern Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Sustainable Design, 8(2), 2341.