Authors : Tanya Rawal

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 4 - April

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2fzepb77

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/3sfjymcs

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26apr1810

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : This paper has discussed the association between emotional dysregulation and social media addiction in young adults, as well as investigated how mindfulness mediates these relationships. With the continued increase in the use of social networking platforms, such as Instagram, Tik Tok, Facebook, and X, the problem of overuse and compulsive behavior have increased. Young adults are prone to problematic use of social media due to issues related to development such as exploration of identity, emotional volatility, academic stress and comparison with peers. The research was conducted on the premise that the people who find it hard to understand, accept, and control their emotions are more likely to use excessive social media usage as a coping strategy to deal with negative emotions. Meanwhile, the concept of mindfulness was discussed as a protective element, which can undermine the correlation between emotional dysregulation and social media addiction. The quantitative research design was employed where young adults were recruited based on standardized self-report measures of emotional dysregulation, mindfulness and social media addiction. The results revealed that the emotional dysregulation was positively related to increased levels of social media addiction. People with more emotional problems were more prone to showing compulsive behaviour of social media use. Mindfulness, however, was observed to have a negative relationship with emotional dysregulation and social media addiction which meant that the more mindful individuals were, the lesser the chances of them becoming social media addicts. The paper highlights the applicability of emotional regulation and mindfulness to elaborate problematic use of social media. These findings might be utilized to create preventive strategies, counseling strategies, and mindfulness-based interventions that might be used to promote optimal digital habits and mental health among young adults.

Keywords : Emotional Dysregulation; Social Media Addiction; Mindfulness; Young Adults; Behavioral Addiction

References :

1. Akbari, M. (2017). Metacognitions or distress intolerance: The mediating role in the relationship between emotional dysregulation and problematic internet use. Addictive Behaviors Reports, 6, 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2017.10.004
2. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
3. American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (2002, amended effective June 1, 2010, and January 1, 2017). https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/
4. Andreassen, C. S., & Pallesen, S. (2015). Online social network site addiction: A comprehensive review. Current Addiction Reports, 2(2), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-015-0056-9
5. Asensio, S., Hernández-Rabaza, V., & Orón Semper, J. V. (2020). What is the “trigger” of addiction? Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2020.00054
6. Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. The American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.44.9.1175
7. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117–148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
8. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
9. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
10. Bulut Serin, N. (2011). An examination of predictor variables for problematic Internet use. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 10(3), 54–62.
11. Caplan, S. E. (2002). Problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being: Development of a theory-based cognitive-behavioral measurement instrument. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(5), 553. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00004-3
12. Caplan, S. E. (2005). A social skill account of problematic Internet use. Journal of Communication. 55(4), 721–736. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb03019.x
13. Casale, S., Caplan, S. E., & Fioravanti, G. (2016). Positive metacognitions about Internet use: The mediating role in the relationship between emotional dysregulation and problematic use. Addictive Behaviors, 59, 84–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.03.014
14. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
15. Eslami, A. A., Norozi, E., Hajihosseini, M., Ramazani, A. A., & Miri, M. R. (2018). Social cognitive theory as a theoretical framework to predict sustained abstinence 6 months after substance use treatment. Journal of Substance Use, 23(3), 300– 306. https://doi.org/10.1080/14659891.2017.1394382
16. Evans, J. R., & Mathur, A. (2018). The value of online surveys: A look back and a look ahead. Internet Research, 28(4), 854–887. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-03-2018-0089
17. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. -G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.41.4.1149
18. Fox, H. C., Axelrod, S. R., Paliwal, P., Sleeper, J., & Sinha, R. (2007). Difficulties in emotion regulation and impulse control during cocaine abstinence. Drug & Alcohol Dependence, 89(2/3), 298–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.12.026
19. Fritz, M. S., & Mackinnon, D. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological science, 18(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01882.x
20. Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology & Behavioral Assessment, 26(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBA.0000007455.08539.94
21. Gratz, K., & Tull, M. (2010). The relationship between emotion dysregulation and deliberate self-harm among inpatients with substance use disorders. Cognitive Therapy & Research, 34(6), 544–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-009-9268-4
22. Heydari, A., Dashtgard, A., & Moghadam, Z. E. (2014). The effect of Bandura’s social cognitive theory implementation on addiction quitting of clients referred to addiction quitting clinics. Iranian Journal of Nursing & Midwifery Research, 19(1), 19–23.
23. Hormes, J. M., Kearns, B., & Timko, C. A. (2014). Craving Facebook? Behavioral addiction to online social networking and its association with emotion regulation deficits. Addiction, 109(12), 2079–2088. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12713