Employee Innovation Performance Model for Traditional Small and Medium-Sized Technology Enterprises


Authors : Zhengyi Zhao; You Zhou; Jie Zhang

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 6 - June


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/44dj3db5

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25jun1433

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : The objectives of this research were: 1) to identify the key factors that affect employee innovation performance in traditional small and medium-sized technology enterprises, and 2) to propose an employee innovation performance model for traditional small and medium-sized technology enterprises. This research employed a quantitative approach. The sample consisted of 276 employees from traditional small and medium-sized technology enterprises, selected through a simple random sampling method. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, multiple regression, and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to test the relationships between the variables. The findings revealed that: 1) self-efficacy, growth need strength, and creativity significantly affected employee innovation performance. Self-efficacy positively affected creativity, and growth need strength enhanced creativity, indirectly boosting employee innovation performance. Creativity was found to be a crucial driver of employee innovation performance, and 2) the employee innovation performance model for traditional small and medium-sized technology enterprises identified three key psychological factors—self-efficacy, growth need strength, and creativity. The model emphasized that fostering self-efficacy and growth need strength in employees was crucial for creating an environment conducive to creativity, which ultimately drove employee innovation performance.

Keywords : Self-Efficacy; Growth Need Strength; Creativity; Employee Innovation Performance.

References :

  1. Amabile, T. M. (2018). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Routledge.
  2. Armstrong, M., & Taylor, S. (2023). Armstrong's handbook of human resource management practice: A guide to the theory and practice of people management. Kogan Page Publishers.
  3. Bandura, A. (2023). Cultivate self‐efficacy for personal and organizational effectiveness. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Principles of organizational behavior: The handbook of evidence‐based management (3rd ed., pp. 113–135). Wiley.
  4. Chen, F. (2023). Non-compliant tasks and employee behavior (Master’s thesis, Zhejiang University of Technology and Business).
  5. Chen, Y., Yuan, R., Guo, X., & Ni, T. (2024). Do foreign acquisitions improve target firms’ green innovation performance? International Review of Economics and Finance, 103, 103458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103458
  6. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.
  7. Gelaidan, H. M., Al-Swidi, A. K., & Al-Hakimi, M. A. (2024). Servant and authentic leadership as drivers of innovative work behaviour: The moderating role of creative self-efficacy. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(6), 1938–1966. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2022-0531
  8. Gist, M. E. (1987). Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of management review12(3), 472-485.
  9. Gui, C., Zhao, X., Zhang, P., Liu, Z., & Zhou, R. (2024). The impact mechanism of employees' AI awareness on their innovation performance in the context of digital intelligence. China Human Resources Development, (08), 6–22. https://doi.org/10.16471/j.cnki.11-2822/c.2024.8001
  10. Hao, S. (2024). Configuration research of green innovation performance improvement path for listed logistics enterprises (Master’s thesis, Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics). https://doi.org/10.27797/d.cnki.gnmgc.2024.000042
  11. Huang, L. (2023). The impact of job matching on employee job performance in Company A (Master’s thesis, East China Jiaotong University). https://doi.org/10.27147/d.cnki.ghdju.2023.000159
  12. Jiang, Y., Wang, H., & Xu, J. (2023). Research on the relationship between work stress and job burnout of logistics employees: Mediated by self-efficacy. Economic Research Guide, (07), 138–141.
  13. Kim, J. B., Kim, J. (S.), & Koo, K. (2024). Financial information, spillovers, and innovation performance. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 107, 212. (Note: Check and correct volume/issue/page if "107212-" was a formatting error.)
  14. Li, B. (2023). The relationship between work stress and job burnout of knowledge workers: The mediating role and intervention of self-efficacy (Master’s thesis, Central China Normal University). https://doi.org/10.27159/d.cnki.ghzsu.2023.001946
  15. Li, J., & Jin, Y. (2023). The impact of innovation orientation of high-tech enterprises on dual innovation and innovation performance. Journal of Yanbian University (Social Sciences Edition), (06), 106–113, 139–140. https://doi.org/10.16154/j.cnki.cn22-1025/c.2023.06.013
  16. Li, W. (2022). The influence of self-efficacy on procrastination: The mediating role of time management disposition and self-control (Master’s thesis, Henan University).
  17. Liu, H., & Zhao, Z. (2024). Research on the relationship between standardization capability and innovation performance based on meta-analysis. Standard Science, (06), 6–15.
  18. Liu, J. (2024). Government subsidies, product market competition, and enterprise innovation performance (Master’s thesis, China Academy of Fiscal Sciences). https://doi.org/10.26975/d.cnki.gccks.2024.000019
  19. Lu, X., & Guo, Z. (2024). The impact of green finance on corporate green innovation performance: A risk bearing perspective. Technology and Industry, (12), 32–38.
  20. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological review50(4), 370.
  21. Meng, Y., Liu, Y., & Xu, L. (2021). The impact of reward deficiency on employees' involvement in creative work: The role of emotional exhaustion and growth demand intensity. Science and Management, (06), 69–75.
  22. Migdadi, M. M. (2022). Knowledge management processes, innovation capability and performance: An empirical study of Jordanian organizations. Knowledge and Process Management, 29(1), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1670
  23. Mumtaz, S., & Parahoo, S. K. (2020). Promoting employee innovation performance: The role of transformational leadership and psychological empowerment. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 35(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-12-2019-0382
  24. Nappi, V., & Kelly, K. (2022). Review of key performance indicators for measuring organizational performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(1), 182–210. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-04-2020-0182
  25. Nie, J., & Wang, Q. (2024). Corporate social responsibility, market segmentation, and innovation performance. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1–24.
  26. Papazoglou, M. E. (2024). Abandonment of core knowledge areas and innovation performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 101, 101814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2024.101814
  27. Shao, Z., Nadi, & Zhong, N. (2024). Research on empowering enterprise intellectual capital management and innovation performance with digitization. Chinese Market, (20), 82–85. https://doi.org/10.13939/j.cnki.zgsc.2024.20.021
  28. Shen, P., & Wang, Y. (2024). Executive green perception, green innovation performance, and corporate ESG performance. Journal of Jinling University of Science and Technology (Social Sciences Edition), (02), 21–29, 84. https://doi.org/10.16515/j.cnki.32-1745/c.2024.02.003
  29. Sun, G., Fang, J., Li, J., & Wang, X. (2024). Research on the impact of the integration of digital economy and real economy on enterprise green innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 200, 123097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123097
  30. Sun, X., & Li, H. (2023). Research on equity incentives, R&D investment, and enterprise innovation performance. Productivity Research, (11), 103–108. https://doi.org/10.19374/j.cnki.14-1145/f.2023.11.019
  31. ang, E., Peng, Y., Zhang, Q., & Xu, Q. (2024). Research on the impact of digital culture on regional innovation performance. Journal of North China University (Social Sciences Edition), (05), 130–139.
  32. Wang, F. (2016). The impact of growth demand intensity on employee job performance: A status competition perspective (Master’s thesis, Huazhong University of Science and Technology). CNKI.
  33. Wang, Q. (2024). Optimization and innovation of performance management in the era of big data. Cloud, (29), 139–141.
  34. West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied psychology51(3), 355-387.
  35. Wu, Y. (2024). The impact of digital technology innovation on ESG performance: Evidence from A-share listed companies in China. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 207, p. 01021). EDP Sciences.
  36. Xiong, J. (2021). The impact of growth demand intensity on individual creativity (Master’s thesis, Huazhong University of Science and Technology). CNKI. https://doi.org/10.27157/d.cnki.ghzku.2021.003320
  37. Xiong, L., & Jiang, X. (2024). Study on the impact of data element allocation on regional innovation performance. Foreign Economic and Trade, (06), 80–83, 95.
  38. Yin, J., Gu, Z., & Li, F. (2024). Research on the impact mechanism of venture capital on innovation performance of high-tech enterprises. Science and Economics, (04), 56–60. https://doi.org/10.14059/j.cnki.cn32-1276n.2022.4012
  39. Zhang, M. (2021). The impact of non-compliant tasks on role performance (Master’s thesis, Zhejiang University of Technology and Business). CNKI. https://doi.org/10.27462/d.cnki.ghzhc.2021.000369
  40. Zhang, Y. (2024). Cultivating a culture of innovation: The impact of leadership style on employee well-being and organizational creativity. International Journal of Global Economics and Management, 2(1), 202–210.
  41. Zheng, G. (2024). Innovative research on enterprise human resource performance management based on big data. Market Modernization, (14), 86–89. https://doi.org/10.14013/j.cnki.scxdh.2022.14048.
  42. Zhou, H., Li, Z., & Li, Z. (2024). Research on the configuration effect of innovation performance of state-owned platform enterprises under the digital background. Technological Progress and Countermeasures, 1–10.

The objectives of this research were: 1) to identify the key factors that affect employee innovation performance in traditional small and medium-sized technology enterprises, and 2) to propose an employee innovation performance model for traditional small and medium-sized technology enterprises. This research employed a quantitative approach. The sample consisted of 276 employees from traditional small and medium-sized technology enterprises, selected through a simple random sampling method. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, multiple regression, and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to test the relationships between the variables. The findings revealed that: 1) self-efficacy, growth need strength, and creativity significantly affected employee innovation performance. Self-efficacy positively affected creativity, and growth need strength enhanced creativity, indirectly boosting employee innovation performance. Creativity was found to be a crucial driver of employee innovation performance, and 2) the employee innovation performance model for traditional small and medium-sized technology enterprises identified three key psychological factors—self-efficacy, growth need strength, and creativity. The model emphasized that fostering self-efficacy and growth need strength in employees was crucial for creating an environment conducive to creativity, which ultimately drove employee innovation performance.

Keywords : Self-Efficacy; Growth Need Strength; Creativity; Employee Innovation Performance.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
31 - July - 2025

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe