English Teachers’ Experiences with Artificial Intelligence-Driven Students’ Outputs in the Classroom


Authors : Rashid B. Bandao

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 7 - July


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/mr3ctku3

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25jul299

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.


Abstract : Artificial Intelligence (AI) has increasingly become an integral component of education, offering innovative opportunities to enhance teaching and learning. This study explored the lived experiences of English teachers at Cotabato State University in managing AI-driven student work, focusing on the challenges they face and the strategies they employ to ensure fairness and quality in assessment. Anchored in the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework, the study investigated how English teachers integrate technological knowledge-specifically AI tools-with pedagogical strategies and content expertise to effectively manage AI-influenced student outputs. Using a qualitative phenomenological design, in-depth interviews were conducted with ten English instructors, and data were analyzed thematically to capture the complex relationship of technology, pedagogy, and content in their instructional practices. Findings revealed that while teachers cautiously incorporate AI as a supplementary resource to enrich learning, they encounter difficulties in detecting AI-generated content, which often appears overly polished or generic. Challenges include students’ overreliance on AI, limited access to reliable detection technologies, and the absence of clear institutional policies. Teachers respond by setting explicit guidelines that require personalization of AI-assisted work, emphasizing critical thinking and independent writing skills, and advocating for professional development and institutional support to enhance their competencies across all TPACK domains. The study underscored the necessity for educational institutions to adopt a balanced approach to AI integration, guided by the TPACK framework, which highlights the essential synergy between technological knowledge, pedagogical methods, and content mastery. It calls for investment not only in AI detection tools but also in comprehensive capacity-building initiatives that empower educators to navigate ethical challenges and maintain academic integrity. Ultimately, this holistic approach ensures that AI serves as a meaningful educational tool that supports authentic learning experiences while preserving the integrity of English language instruction.

Keywords : Artificial Intelligence, Academic Integrity, Teacher Experiences Student Assessments.

References :

  1. Adlawan, D. (2024). The Pros and Cons of AI in Education and How It Will Impact Teachers in 2024
  2. Aljemely, Y. (2024). Challenges and best practices in training teachers to utilize artificial intelligence: a systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1470853
  3. Aljuaid, H. (2024). The Impact of Artificial intelligence Tools on academic writing instruction in Higher Education: A Systematic review. Arab World English Journal, 1(1), 26–55. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/chatgpt.2
  4. Almasri, F. (2024). Exploring the Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Teaching and Learning of Science: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research. Research in Science Education, 54(5), 977–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10176-3
  5. Barrett, A., & Pack, A. (2023). Not quite eye to A.I.: student and teacher perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence in the writing process. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00427-0
  6. Benarab, I. H. (2024). Detection of AI-generated Writing in Students’ Assignments: A Comparative Analysis of Some Tools’ Reliability. أطراس, 5(3), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.70091/atras/ai.17
  7. Bisht, R. (2024) What is Purposive Sampling? Methods, Techniques, andExamples https://researcher.life/blog/article/what-is-purposive-sampling-methods-techniques-and-examples/
  8. Çela, E., Fonkam, M. M., & Potluri, R. M. (2024). Risks of AI-Assisted learning on student critical Thinking. International Journal of Risk and Contingency Management, 12(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijrcm.350185
  9. Chan, C.K. (2023). A Comprehensive AI Policy Education Framework forUniversity Teaching and Learning
  10. Chun Tie Y., Birks M., Francis K. (2019) Grounded theory research: A design framework for novice researchers. doi: 10.1177/2050312118822927
  11. Coley, M., Snay, P., Bandy, J., Bradley, J., Molvig, O. (2023). Teaching in the Age of AI. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching. https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/
  12. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018), Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications
  13. Crompton, H., Edmett, A., Ichaporia, N., Burke D. (2024) AI and English language teaching: Affordances and challenges. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13460
  14. Dawadi, S. (2020) Thematic Analysis Approach: A Step-by-Step Guide for ELT Research Practitioners. NELTA Journal 2020 https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED612353.pdf
  15. De Jesus, F.S., Ibarra, L.M., Passion, B.J., Villanueva, W., Leyesa, M. (2024) International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(6). https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.6.16
  16. Dempere, J., Modugu, K., Hesham, A., Ramasamy, L.K. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on higher education. Front. Educ., Sec. Higher Education, Volume 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1206936
  17. Dugosija, Tatjana. (2024). BENEFITS AND CHALLENGES OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING. Knowledge International Journal. 62. 275-280.
  18. Duong, T. (2023). AI's Impact on Academic Writing and Mitigating Challenges in the Digital Era. Review Article 5(1), 1 – 7. DOI:  10.47310/iajel. 2023.v05i01.002
  19. Ejjami, R. (2024). Ethical Artificial Intelligence Framework Theory (EAIFT): a new paradigm for embedding ethical reasoning in AI systems. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research6(5). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.28231
  20. Elkhatat, A. M., Elsaid, K., & Almeer, S. (2023). Evaluating the efficacy of AI content detection tools in differentiating between human and AI-generated text. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00140-5
  21. Fabro, R.B., Rivera, J., Sambrano, L., Dinoy, L.J., Alcozer, N., Agustin, M. (2024) Perceptions and Extent of Utilization of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) among Filipino Students. International Journal of Education and Research, 12(7).
  22. Farooqi, M. T. K., Amanat, I., & Awan, S. M. (2024). Ethical Considerations and Challenges in the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Education: a Systematic review. Journal of Excellence in Management Sciences., 3(4), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.69565/jems.v3i4.314
  23. Fleckenstein, J., Meyer, J., Jansen, T., Keller, S., Köller, O., Möller, J. (2024). Do teachers spot AI? Evaluating the detectability of AI-generated texts among student essays. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, Volume 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100209.
  24. Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Reviewhttps://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1
  25. Fošner, A. (2024). University Students’ Attitudes and Perceptions towards AI Tools: Implications for Sustainable Educational Practices. Sustainability, 16(19), 8668. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198668
  26. Gerlich, M. (2025). AI Tools in Society: Impacts on cognitive offloading and the future of critical thinking. Societies, 15(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006
  27. Giray, L., De Silos, P. Y., Adornado, A., Buelo, R. J. V., Galas, E., Reyes-Chua, E., Santiago, C., & Ulanday, M. L. (2024). Use and Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Philippine Higher Education: Reflections from Instructors and Administrators. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 28(3), 315–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2024.2352746
  28. Hallström, J. (2020). Embodying the past, designing the future: technological determinism reconsidered in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education32(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09600-2
  29. Harper, R. (2023). The Pros and Cons of Using AI in Learning: Is ChatGPT Helping or Hindering Learning Outcomes? https://elearningindustry.com/pros-and-cons-of-using-ai-in-learning-chatgpt-helping-or-hindering-learning-outcomes
  30. Hung, T., Tuan, D. N., & Thanh, N. T. (2022). Assessment of high school students’ learning and development of qualities and Competencies: a case study. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research9(4), 216–223. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v9i4.4196
  31. Jeilani, A., & Abubakar, S. (2025). Perceived institutional support and its effects on student perceptions of AI learning in higher education: the role of mediating perceived learning outcomes and moderating technology self-efficacy. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1548900
  32. Kaledio, Potter and Robert, Abill and Frank, Louis, The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Students' Learning Experience (February 1, 2024). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4716747 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4716747
  33. Konyrova, L. (2024). The Evolution of Language Learning: Exploring AI’s Impact on Teaching English as a Second Language. Eurasian Science Review an International Peer-Reviewed Multidisciplinary Journal, 2(2), 133–138. https://doi.org/10.63034/esr-42
  34. Kumar, Om. (2023). Investigating the Impact of Artificial Intelligence AI and Technology in English Language Learning. Advances in Social Behavior Research. 3. 27-36.
  35. Viktorivna, K. L., Oleksandrovych, V. A., Oleksandrivna, K. I., & Oleksandrivna, K. N. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Language Learning: What Are We Afraid of. Arab World English Journal, 8, 262–273. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call8.18
  36. Lancaster, T. Artificial intelligence, text generation tools and ChatGPT – does digital watermarking offer a solution? Int J Educ Integr 19, 10 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00131-6
  37. Langreo L, (2024), 8 Tips for Schools to Avoid Chaos in the Age of AI https://www.edweek.org/technology/8-tips-for-schools-to-avoid-chaos-in-the-age-of-ai/2024/02
  38. Larkin, L., Gallagher, S., Fraser, A., Kennedy, N. (2016). AB1102-HPR “if A Joint Is Hot, It's Not the Time”: Health Professionals' Views on Developing Physical Activity Interventions for People Who Have Rheumatoid Arthritis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 75. 1308.3-1308. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-eular.1670.
  39. Kelley, K.J. (2023). Teaching Actual Student Writing in an AI World
  40. Mahmud, M. S., & Drus, N. F. M. (2023). The use of oral questioning to improve students’ reasoning skills in primary school mathematics learning. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1126816
  41. Maphoto, K. B., Sevnarayan, K., Mohale, N. E., Suliman, Z., Ntsopi, T. J., & Mokoena, D. (2024). Advancing Students’ academic excellence in distance Education: Exploring the potential of generative AI integration to improve academic writing skills. Open Praxis, 16(2), 142–159. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.16.2.649
  42. Marzuki, Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, & Indrawati, I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2023.2236469
  43. McGraw Hill Canada. (2019, April 16). What is TPACK theory and how can it be used in the classroom. McGraw Hill. https://www.mheducation.ca/blog/what-is-tpack-theory-and-how-can-it-be-used-in-the-classroom/
  44. Meakin, L. (2024). AI and assessment: Rethinking assessment strategies and supporting students in appropriate use of AI
  45. Mills, K., Ruiz, P., Lee, K. (2024). Revealing an AI Literacy Framework for Learners and Educators https://digitalpromise.org/2024/02/21/revealing-an-ai-literacy-framework-for-learners-and-educators/
  46. Ningtyas, P. D. a. M., & Haris, I. (2024). The impact of utilizing Artificial intelligence in Independent Curriculum-Based Learning. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences, 2(4), 426–439. https://doi.org/10.37329/ijms.v2i4.3732
  47. Oliver, M. (2011). Technological Determinism in Educational Technology Research: Some Alternative Ways of Thinking about the Relationship between Learning and Technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(5), 373-384.
  48. Oravec, J.A. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Implications for Academic Cheating: Expanding the Dimensions of Responsible Human-AI Collaboration with ChatGPT and Bard. Jl. of Interactive Learning Research 34(2), 213-237.
  49. Ortiz, M.J. (2024).  The Issue of Artificial Intelligence in Education
  50. https://www.depedsanjuancity.ph/single-post/the-issue-of-artificial-intelligence-in-education
  51. Park, Y., & Doo, M. Y. (2024). Role of AI in Blended Learning: A Systematic Literature review. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(1), 164–196. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i1.7566
  52. Phillips, B. (2024). The ‘deep learn’ framework: elevating AI literacy in higher education https://www.timeshighereducation.com/campus/deep-learn-framework-elevating-ai-literacy-higher-education
  53. Radeva, M. (2024). Guest Post: The Benefits and Risks of ChatGPT for Education: Guest Posts, For Teachers, For Students. https://www.learningscientists.org/blog/2024/2/15-1
  54. Rakya, Z. H. (2023). Exploring the Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Learner-Instructor Interaction in Online Learning (Literature Review). International Journal of Emerging Multidisciplinaries Computer Science & Artificial Intelligence2(1). https://doi.org/10.54938/ijemdcsai.2023.02.1.236
  55. Robert, A., Potter, K., Frank, L. (2024). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Students' Learning Experience. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics. 10.2139/ssrn.4716747.
  56. Salido, Veronica. (2023). Impact of AI-Powered Learning Tools on Student Understanding and Academic Performance. 10.13140/RG.2.2.17259.31521.
  57. Salman, S., & R, C. (2024). The Influence of AI-Powered Learning Platforms on Student Engagement and Performance: Emerging Technologies in Education. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 5(7), 1816–1824. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.5.0724.1750
  58. Santos, M.R., Cruz, M. (2024). The Effect of Students’ Use of AI In Research: Towards Policy Recommendations on The Responsible Use of AI In Schools. Globus Journal of Progressive Education a Refereed Research Journal, 14(1). doi: 10.46360/globus.edu.220241007
  59. Sasikala, P., & Ravichandran, R. (2024). Study on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Student Learning Outcomes. Journal of Digital Learning and Education4(2), 145-155. https://doi.org/10.52562/jdle.v4i2.1234
  60. Shehab, H. (2022). The Effect of Technology on Learning English as a Second Language. International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 10(4), 474-481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7431770
  61. Seo, K., Tang, J., Roll, I. et al. The impact of artificial intelligence on learner–instructor interaction in online learning. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 18, 54 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00292-9
  62. Slimi, Z. (2023). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Higher Education: An Empirical Study. European Journal of Educational Sciences10(1). https://doi.org/10.19044/ejes.v10no1a17
  63. Solak, Ekrem. (2024). Revolutionizing Language Learning: How ChatGPT and AI are changing the Way We Learn Languages. International Journal of Technology in Education. 7. 353-372. 10.46328/ijte.732.
  64. Thongprasit, J., Wannapiroon, P. (2022) Framework of Artificial Intelligence Learning Platform for Education. International Education Studies 15(1). doi:10.5539/ies. v15n1p76
  65. Trocki, A. (2023) A Preliminary Framework for Artificial Intelligence–Supported Assessments: Models of Assessment and Feedback https://www.centerforengagedlearning.org/a-preliminary-framework-for-artificial-intelligencesupported-assignments-models-of-assessment-and-feedback/
  66. Ugwu, C. & Eze, V. (2023). Qualitative Research. 8. 20-35. University of Sothern California (2024) Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Assignments https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/assignments/casestudy
  67. Vargas-Murillo, A.R., de la Asuncion Pari-Bedoya, I.N.M., Guevara-Soto, F. (2023) Challenges and Opportunities of AI-Assisted Learning: A Systematic Literature Review on the Impact of ChatGPT Usage in Higher Education.
  68. Vernersson, N. (2024). Advantages and Disadvantages of Artificial Intelligence in Education. https://www.digiexam.com/blog/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-artificial-intelligence-in-education
  69. Walter, Y. (2024). Embracing the future of Artificial Intelligence in the classroom: the relevance of AI literacy, prompt engineering, and critical thinking in modern education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3
  70. Wood, P. (2023) Oxford and Cambridge ban AI language tool GPT-3 over fears of plagiarism. inews.co.uk. https://inews.co.uk/news/oxford-cambridge-ban-chatgpt-plagiarism-universities-2178391
  71. Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2020). The effects of providing and receiving peer feedback on writing performance and learning of secondary school students. American Educational Research Journal, 58(3), 492–526. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831220945266
  72. Yang, H. (2023). The Negative Impact of Artificial Intelligence TechnologyonCollegeEnglish Teaching and the Countermeasures. https://systems.enpress-publisher.com/index.php/IJMSS/article/viewFile/3127/1908

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has increasingly become an integral component of education, offering innovative opportunities to enhance teaching and learning. This study explored the lived experiences of English teachers at Cotabato State University in managing AI-driven student work, focusing on the challenges they face and the strategies they employ to ensure fairness and quality in assessment. Anchored in the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework, the study investigated how English teachers integrate technological knowledge-specifically AI tools-with pedagogical strategies and content expertise to effectively manage AI-influenced student outputs. Using a qualitative phenomenological design, in-depth interviews were conducted with ten English instructors, and data were analyzed thematically to capture the complex relationship of technology, pedagogy, and content in their instructional practices. Findings revealed that while teachers cautiously incorporate AI as a supplementary resource to enrich learning, they encounter difficulties in detecting AI-generated content, which often appears overly polished or generic. Challenges include students’ overreliance on AI, limited access to reliable detection technologies, and the absence of clear institutional policies. Teachers respond by setting explicit guidelines that require personalization of AI-assisted work, emphasizing critical thinking and independent writing skills, and advocating for professional development and institutional support to enhance their competencies across all TPACK domains. The study underscored the necessity for educational institutions to adopt a balanced approach to AI integration, guided by the TPACK framework, which highlights the essential synergy between technological knowledge, pedagogical methods, and content mastery. It calls for investment not only in AI detection tools but also in comprehensive capacity-building initiatives that empower educators to navigate ethical challenges and maintain academic integrity. Ultimately, this holistic approach ensures that AI serves as a meaningful educational tool that supports authentic learning experiences while preserving the integrity of English language instruction.

Keywords : Artificial Intelligence, Academic Integrity, Teacher Experiences Student Assessments.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
31 - December - 2025

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe