Authors : Mohamed Amish

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 1 - January

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/bdf9vzvz

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/ekkuxu23

DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14831458

Abstract : There is a gap between the skills taught in higher education and those needed in the workplace, with employers often finding engineering graduates lacking in soft and digital skills. Traditional university courses may not adequately prepare students for the job market as they are content-focused and educator-centered. To address this gap, formal education should incorporate essential pedagogy strategies and technology needed in the workplace, especially in the post- COVID-19 era. Many universities are updating their curricula to align with industry demands. This study explores the role of technology and pedagogy-based solutions in enhancing the employability of engineering students engaged in collaborative project-based learning activities. The aim is to improve teaching and learning effectiveness and offer interdisciplinary courses that enhance students' job prospects. Data were collected from 205 project students through questionnaires, and qualitative data were gathered from interviews with 35 students and 25 supervisors, employing a mixed-methods research approach. Analysis revealed that students actively participated in group discussions, decision- making, and information sharing for the project. Collaborating within their learning community enhanced their learning experience through communication and involvement in group activities. Collaborative approach enhances creativity, sustainability, and innovation in engineering. Working together allows students to share ideas and develop creative solutions for complex problems, deepening their understanding of the subject. Collaborative learning has improved students' comprehension and career opportunities by integrating pedagogical techniques with technology. This approach has enhanced academic achievement and developed digital and soft skills, making students more competitive in the dynamic job market.

Keywords : Engineering, Collaborative Learning, Soft Skills, Digital Skills.

References :

1. Adams, S., (2014). The 10 skills employers most want in 2015 graduates. Forbes. Leadership. NOV, 12.
2. Alario-Hoyos, C., Bote-Lorenzo, M.L., Gómez-Sánchez, E., Asensio-Pérez, J.I., Vega-Gorgojo, G. and Ruiz-Calleja, A. (2013). Enhancing learning environments by integrating external applications. Bulletin of the IEEE Technical Committee on Learning Technology, 15(1), pp.21-24.
3. Al-Rahmi, W. and Othman, M. (2013). The impact of social media use on academic performance among university students: A pilot study. Journal of information systems research and innovation, 4(12), pp.1-10.
4. Amish, M., 2024. Enhancing workplace skills through work-based learning in engineering education. International journal of innovative science and research technology, [online], 9(7), pages 1983-1990. 
5. Amish, M. and Etta-Agbor, E. (2023). Genetic programming application in predicting fluid loss severity. Results in engineering, 20, p.101464.
6. Amish, M. and Khodja, M. (2024). Review of detection, prediction and treatment of fluid loss events. Arabian Journal of Geosciences.
7. Amish, M. and Jihan, S. (2023). Developing collaborative online project-based learning model to enhance learning in engineering. The 4th Global Conference on Education and Teaching. Applications. Bulletin of the IEEE Technical Committee on Learning Technology, 15(1), 21–24.
8. Arnold-Smeets, L. (2015). 5 hard and soft skills that will get you hired. PayScale.
9. Baker, T.& Clark, J. (2010). Cooperative learning – a double-edged sword: A cooperative learning model for use with diverse student groups. Intercultural Education, 21, 257–268. 
10. Ballantine, J. & Larres, P.M. (2007). Cooperative Learning: Pedagogy to Improve Students Generic Skills? Journal of Education and Training, 49, 126-137.
11. Carlos, A.-H., Miguel L., B.-L., Eduardo, G.-S., Juan I., A.-P., Guillermo, E.-G., and Adolfo, R.-C. (2013). Enhancing Learning Environments by Integrating External
12. Cascio WF, and Montealegre R. (2016). How technology is changing work and organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior; 3:349–375.  
13. Chanpet, P., Chomsuwan, K. and Murphy, E. (2020). Online project-based learning and formative assessment. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25, pp.685-705.           
14. Chen, Y. (2011). Learning styles and adopting Facebook technology. Technology Management in the Energy Smart World (PICMET) (pp. 1–9).
15. Chiong, R., & Jovanovic, J. (2012). Collaborative Learning in Online Study Groups: An Evolutionary Game Theory Perspective. Journal of Information Technology Education: 11, 81–101.
16. Coates, H., James, R. and Baldwin, G. (2005). A critical examination of the effects of learning management systems on university teaching and learning. Tertiary Education and Management, 11(1):19-36, 2005., 11(1), 19–36.
17. Creswell, J. W., and Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approach (5thed.). Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications
18. Ellis, T. J., and Hafner, W. (2009). Building a framework to support project-based collaborative learning experiences in an asynchronous learning network. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 4(1), 167–190.
19. Fang, M.J.; Zheng, X.X.; Hu, W.Q.; Shen, Y. (2011). On the ADDIE-based effective instructional design for higher education classrooms. Adv. Mater. Res. 271–273, 1542–1547.
20. Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., and Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48, 2134-2156.
21. Friesen, N. and Kuskis, A. (2013). Modes of interaction. In Handbook of distance education (pp. 369-389). Routledge.
22. Guetterman, T. C., Fetters, M. D., and Creswell, J. W. (2015). Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. Annals of Family Medicine, 13, 554- 561.
23. Ha Le, Jeroen Janssen, and Theo Wubbels (2018). Collaborative learning practices: teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration.
24. Khodja, M., Debih, H., Lebtahi, H. and Amish, M.B., 2022. New HTHP fluid loss control agent for oil-based drilling fluid from pharmaceutical waste. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 8, p.100476.
25. Kothari, C. R. (2014). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Age International.
26. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610.
27. Lin, J., & Tsai, C. (2016). The impact of an online project-based learning environment with group awareness support on students with different self-regulation levels: An extended-period experiment. Computers & Education, 99, 28-38.
28. Mahdi, M.A.A., Amish, M. and Oluyemi, G., 2023. An Artificial Lift Selection Approach Using Machine Learning: A Case Study in Sudan. Energies, 16(6), p.2853.
29. Morrison, G. R. (2010). Designing Effective Instruction (6th Edition.). John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey.
30. Mugenda, O., and Mugenda, A. (2008). Research methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Nairobi, African centre for technology studies (Acts) Press
31. Olivo, R.F., (2012). Collaborative online writing assignments to foster active learning. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 11(1), p.A82.
32. Olson, K. (2010). An examination of questionnaire evaluation by experts. Field methods, 22(4), 503-529.
33. Ormrod, L.E. (2008). Human learning (5th eds.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
34. Saari, A., Rasul, M.S., Yasin, R.M., Rauf, R.A.A., Ashari, Z.H.M. and Pranita, D. (2021). Skills sets for workforce in the 4th industrial revolution: Expectation from authorities and industrial players. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 13(2), pp.1-9.                 
35. Sangoseni, O., Hellman, M., and Hill, C. (2012). Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess the effect of online learning on behaviours, attitudes and clinical practices of physical therapists in United States regarding evidence-based practice. Journal of Allied Health Science Practice, 11, 1-12.
36. Sefton-Green, Julian, Helen Nixon and Ola Erstad. (2009). Reviewing Approaches and Perspectives on Digital Literacy. Pedagogies: An International Journal 4 (2): 107-125.
37. Swan, K., Shen, J., & Hiltz, S. (2006). Assessment and collaboration in online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning 45–62.
38. Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and reliability of the research instruments. How to test the validation of a questionnaire or survey in research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 5(3), 28-36.
39. Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. (2015).  A/RES/ 70/1.  New York, USA: United Nations.
40. Van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Erkens, G., & Brekelmans, M. (2013). Teacher interventions in a synchronous, co-located CSCL setting: Analyzing focus, means, and temporality. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1377–1386. 
41. White, C. (2013). The real reason new college grads can’t get hired. Time.
42. World Economic Forum. (2016). The future of jobs: Employment, skills and workforce strategy for the fourth industrial revolution. Global Challenge Insight Report. 
43. Yu-Hui, C., & Yu-Chang, H. (2013). Peer feedback to facilitate project-based learning in an online environment. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(5), 259-276.
44. Zhu, C. (2012). Student Satisfaction, Performance, and Knowledge Construction in Online. Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 127-136