Authors :
Nayeemuddin; Ansari Faiyaz Ahmed
Volume/Issue :
Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 3 - March
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/5eeupxsx
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/mu9376th
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24MAR1980
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) composites
hold significant potential across various industrial
applications due to their desirable mechanical, thermal,
and electrical properties. In this study, we utilized the
PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organization
Method for Enrichment Evaluations) method to evaluate
six alternative reinforcement materials for PBT
composites: Glass Fibers (GF), Carbon Fibers (CF),
Natural Fibers (NF), Carbon Nanotubes (CN), Nano-clay
Particles (NP), and Aramid Fibers (AF). The evaluation
parameters considered were Tensile Strength (MPa),
Flexural Strength (MPa), Thermal Conductivity (W/mK),
Electrical Conductivity (S/m), and Cost ($). Through
comprehensive analysis, Carbon Nanotubes emerged as
the top-ranked reinforcement material, exhibiting
exceptional performance across all evaluation
parameters. With high Tensile Strength, Flexural
Strength, and Thermal Conductivity, combined with
significant Electrical Conductivity, Carbon Nanotubes
demonstrated their suitability for demanding
applications. Additionally, while the Cost factor was
comparatively higher, its superior performance justifies
the investment. Conversely, Natural Fibers received the
lowest rank among the alternatives. Despite potential
advantages in cost-effectiveness and environmental
sustainability, Natural Fibers exhibited inferior
mechanical and thermal properties compared to other
materials. Their low Tensile Strength, Flexural Strength,
and negligible Electrical Conductivity highlight
limitations in performance for many industrial
applications. This study provides valuable insights for
engineers and material scientists in selecting suitable
reinforcement materials for PBT composites based on
specific performance criteria. The PROMETHEE method
offers a systematic approach to decision-making,
facilitating informed choices in material selection for
diverse applications. Future research could explore
optimization strategies and further investigate the
properties and potential applications of emerging
reinforcement materials for PBT composites.
Keywords :
Polybutylene Terephthalate (PBT); Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations(PROMETHEE); Glass Fibers (GF) ; Carbon Fibers (CF) ; Natural Fibers (NF) ; Carbon Nanotubes (CN).
Polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) composites
hold significant potential across various industrial
applications due to their desirable mechanical, thermal,
and electrical properties. In this study, we utilized the
PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organization
Method for Enrichment Evaluations) method to evaluate
six alternative reinforcement materials for PBT
composites: Glass Fibers (GF), Carbon Fibers (CF),
Natural Fibers (NF), Carbon Nanotubes (CN), Nano-clay
Particles (NP), and Aramid Fibers (AF). The evaluation
parameters considered were Tensile Strength (MPa),
Flexural Strength (MPa), Thermal Conductivity (W/mK),
Electrical Conductivity (S/m), and Cost ($). Through
comprehensive analysis, Carbon Nanotubes emerged as
the top-ranked reinforcement material, exhibiting
exceptional performance across all evaluation
parameters. With high Tensile Strength, Flexural
Strength, and Thermal Conductivity, combined with
significant Electrical Conductivity, Carbon Nanotubes
demonstrated their suitability for demanding
applications. Additionally, while the Cost factor was
comparatively higher, its superior performance justifies
the investment. Conversely, Natural Fibers received the
lowest rank among the alternatives. Despite potential
advantages in cost-effectiveness and environmental
sustainability, Natural Fibers exhibited inferior
mechanical and thermal properties compared to other
materials. Their low Tensile Strength, Flexural Strength,
and negligible Electrical Conductivity highlight
limitations in performance for many industrial
applications. This study provides valuable insights for
engineers and material scientists in selecting suitable
reinforcement materials for PBT composites based on
specific performance criteria. The PROMETHEE method
offers a systematic approach to decision-making,
facilitating informed choices in material selection for
diverse applications. Future research could explore
optimization strategies and further investigate the
properties and potential applications of emerging
reinforcement materials for PBT composites.
Keywords :
Polybutylene Terephthalate (PBT); Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations(PROMETHEE); Glass Fibers (GF) ; Carbon Fibers (CF) ; Natural Fibers (NF) ; Carbon Nanotubes (CN).
