Authors :
Stephanny Sylvester Maluda; Rosima Alias
Volume/Issue :
Volume 7 - 2022, Issue 3 - March
Google Scholar :
http://bitly.ws/gu88
Scribd :
https://bit.ly/3N6HSkO
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6374918
Abstract :
Engineering is a premier career choice among
students in higher education institutions but there is a
growing number of engineering graduates in
unemployment and underemployment. Due to that,
entrepreneurship education has been introduced to
engineering students with the hope that this could improve
their entrepreneurial self-efficacy and subsequently
leading to greater intention to become self-employed. This
descriptive study involved a total of 292 engineering
undergraduates selected via purposive sampling from four
higher education institutions in Malaysia. Using adapted
measurement scales from past studies, the
interrelationships among entrepreneurship education,
entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intention
were investigated. Based on a structural equation modeling
with partial least square, data were analyzed
quantitatively to test the direct and indirect relationships
among these variables. Findings indicated that
entrepreneurship curriculum and university support
contribute significantly and positively to enhance
entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intention
but not teaching methodologies. Further to that,
entrepreneurial self-efficacy mediated the relationships of
entrepreneurship curriculum and university support with
entrepreneurial intention but not teaching methodologies.
The overall structural model yielded 38.2% and 69.8% of
predictive accuracy to explain entrepreneurial self-efficacy
and entrepreneurial intention respectively. In comparison,
entrepreneurship curriculum has a greater effect size
compared to university roles while teaching methodologies
had negligible effect size to explain entrepreneurial selfefficacy and entrepreneurial intention. The study also
concluded that entrepreneurial self-efficacy has a large
effect size on entrepreneurial intention. Hence, these
findings implied the need to focus on the adequacy and
relevance of entrepreneurship curriculum and encourage
greater intervention from the university in promoting
entrepreneurial intention among students. Additionally,
there is a dire necessity of improving teaching
methodologies to improve students’ engagement in
entrepreneurship learning activities. Future studies should
explore in greater detail about students’ preference for
learning entrepreneurship effectively and other aspects of
entrepreneurship education.
Keywords :
Entrepreneurial self-efficacy, entrepreneurial intention, entrepreneurship education, engineering undergraduates, entrepreneurship curriculum, teaching methodologies, university support.
Engineering is a premier career choice among
students in higher education institutions but there is a
growing number of engineering graduates in
unemployment and underemployment. Due to that,
entrepreneurship education has been introduced to
engineering students with the hope that this could improve
their entrepreneurial self-efficacy and subsequently
leading to greater intention to become self-employed. This
descriptive study involved a total of 292 engineering
undergraduates selected via purposive sampling from four
higher education institutions in Malaysia. Using adapted
measurement scales from past studies, the
interrelationships among entrepreneurship education,
entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intention
were investigated. Based on a structural equation modeling
with partial least square, data were analyzed
quantitatively to test the direct and indirect relationships
among these variables. Findings indicated that
entrepreneurship curriculum and university support
contribute significantly and positively to enhance
entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intention
but not teaching methodologies. Further to that,
entrepreneurial self-efficacy mediated the relationships of
entrepreneurship curriculum and university support with
entrepreneurial intention but not teaching methodologies.
The overall structural model yielded 38.2% and 69.8% of
predictive accuracy to explain entrepreneurial self-efficacy
and entrepreneurial intention respectively. In comparison,
entrepreneurship curriculum has a greater effect size
compared to university roles while teaching methodologies
had negligible effect size to explain entrepreneurial selfefficacy and entrepreneurial intention. The study also
concluded that entrepreneurial self-efficacy has a large
effect size on entrepreneurial intention. Hence, these
findings implied the need to focus on the adequacy and
relevance of entrepreneurship curriculum and encourage
greater intervention from the university in promoting
entrepreneurial intention among students. Additionally,
there is a dire necessity of improving teaching
methodologies to improve students’ engagement in
entrepreneurship learning activities. Future studies should
explore in greater detail about students’ preference for
learning entrepreneurship effectively and other aspects of
entrepreneurship education.
Keywords :
Entrepreneurial self-efficacy, entrepreneurial intention, entrepreneurship education, engineering undergraduates, entrepreneurship curriculum, teaching methodologies, university support.