Authors :
Lizainul Islam Ripon
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 8 - August
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/5fts8y7k
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26aug1619
Note : A published paper may take 4-5
working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and
ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Entrepreneurship education has become increasingly prominent across South Asia as governments and higher
education institutions seek to promote innovation, employability, self-employment, and entrepreneurial capability.
However, evidence from different regions is still inconsistent, and simply offering more entrepreneurship courses does not
guarantee better entrepreneurial learning or successful ventures. Building on previous regional policy analyses, this article
critically synthesizes entrepreneurship education in Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan,
and Sri Lanka, focusing on developments since 2018 and incorporating evidence available through 2026. The review is
organized around five recurring dimensions: policy commitment, institutional provision, curriculum and pedagogy,
entrepreneurial ecosystem integration, and gender and social inclusion. The literature on India and Pakistan highlights
relatively well-developed policy and institutional frameworks, whereas recent research on Bangladesh points to persistent
challenges related to curriculum design, institutional collaboration, and the broader entrepreneurial ecosystem. Emerging
evidence from Bangladesh and the Maldives further expands the discussion beyond entrepreneurial intention by
emphasizing employability, entrepreneurial skills, and capability development. However, the available evidence from
Afghanistan, Bhutan, Nepal, and some areas of Sri Lanka is limited or only covers certain institutions. Because of this, it is
not appropriate to make strong cross-national rankings. Across the region, a common lesson emerges: effective
entrepreneurship education depends less on the formal presence of courses than on the quality of learning, educator
capability, institutional support, experiential opportunities, ecosystem connections, and contextual relevance. Based on the
comparative synthesis, this article introduces a provisional Regional Entrepreneurship Education Strengthening
Framework that emphasizes policy-to-practice alignment, institutional capability, experiential pedagogy, ecosystem
connectivity, and inclusive participation.
Keywords :
Entrepreneurship Education; South Asia; Higher Education; Entrepreneurial Ecosystem; Experiential Learning; Entrepreneurship Policy; Inclusion; Entrepreneurial Competencies.
References :
- Z. J. Ács, E. Autio, and L. Szerb, “National systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications,” Research Policy, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 476–494, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.016.
- G. Nabi, F. Liñán, A. Fayolle, N. Krueger, and A. Walmsley, “The impact of entrepreneurship education in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda,” Academy of Management Learning & Education, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 277–299, 2017, doi: 10.5465/amle.2015.0026.
- A. Carpenter and R. Wilson, “A systematic review looking at the effect of entrepreneurship education on higher education student,” The International Journal of Management Education, vol. 20, no. 2, art. 100541, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100541.
- A. Sreenivasan and M. Suresh, “Twenty years of entrepreneurship education: A bibliometric analysis,” Entrepreneurship Education, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 45–68, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s41959-023-00089-z.
- K. Anubhav, A. K. Dwivedi, and K. Aashish, “Entrepreneurship education in higher education (2002–2022): A technology-empowered systematic literature review,” The International Journal of Management Education, vol. 22, no. 3, art. 100993, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2024.100993.
- M. A. Cervantes-Muñoz, C. Devece, and M. Peris-Ortiz, “University-level entrepreneurship education: A bibliometric review using Tree of Science,” Multidisciplinary Journal for Education, Social and Technological Sciences, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2024, doi: 10.4995/muse.2024.20688.
- S. C. Talukder, Z. Lakner, and Á. Temesi, “Development and state of the art of entrepreneurship education: A bibliometric review,” Education Sciences, vol. 14, no. 3, art. 295, 2024, doi: 10.3390/educsci14030295.
- M. Passarelli and G. Bongiorno, “Is it the time to reshape entrepreneurship education? State-of-the-art and further perspectives,” International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, vol. 21, no. 1, art. 61, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s11365-025-01071-y.
- W. Alakaleek, Y. Harb, A. A. Harb, and A. Al Shishany, “The impact of entrepreneurship education: A study of entrepreneurial outcomes,” The International Journal of Management Education, vol. 21, no. 2, art. 100800, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100800.
- V. F. Motta and S. V. R. Galina, “Experiential learning in entrepreneurship education: A systematic literature review,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 121, art. 103919, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2022.103919.
- K. B. Rai, “Education and entrepreneurship: Policy review of South Asian countries,” International Journal of Social Sciences and Management, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 60–68, 2018, doi: 10.3126/ijssm.v5i2.19394.
- C. Baethge, S. Goldbeck-Wood, and S. Mertens, “SANRAa scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles,” Research Integrity and Peer Review, vol. 4, art. 5, 2019, doi: 10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8.
- M. Uddin, H. Bal, N. Hoque, and A. Mamun, “Entrepreneurship education and graduate employability in emerging economies: A moderated-mediated model of employability orientation and career awareness,” The International Journal of Management Education, vol. 24, no. 2, art. 101415, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2026.101415.
- H. V. Mukesh, K. R. Pillai, and J. Mamman, “Action-embedded pedagogy in entrepreneurship education: An experimental enquiry,” Studies in Higher Education, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 1679–1693, 2020, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1599848.
- M. Chhabra, L.-P. Dana, S. Malik, and N. S. Chaudhary, “Entrepreneurship education and training in Indian higher education institutions: A suggested framework,” Education + Training, vol. 63, no. 7/8, pp. 1154–1174, 2021, doi: 10.1108/ET-10-2020-0310.
- H. V. Mukesh and K. R. Pillai, “Role of institutional ecosystem in entrepreneurship education: An empirical reiteration,” The Journal of Entrepreneurship, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 176–205, 2020, doi: 10.1177/0971355719893521.
- R. Agrawal, P. Bakhshi, A. Chandani, R. Birau, and S. Mendon, “Challenges faced by women entrepreneurs in South Asian countries using interpretive structural modeling,” Cogent Business & Management, vol. 10, no. 2, art. 2244755, 2023, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2023.2244755.
- S. Bazgar and N. U. H. Wani, “Enhancing entrepreneurial education and self-efficacy through Technical Vocational Education and Training-Authority of Afghanistan (TVET-AVI): Evaluation and way forward,” Kardan Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1–21, 2022, doi: 10.31841/KJEMS.2022.121.
- M. S. Shahriar, M. S. Hassan, M. A. Islam, F. A. Sobhani, and M. T. Islam, “Entrepreneurial intention among university students of a developing economy: The mediating role of access to finance and entrepreneurship program,” Cogent Business & Management, vol. 11, no. 1, art. 2322021, 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2322021.
- M. Uddin, H. Bal, and N. Hoque, “Paving the way towards effective entrepreneurship education in private higher educational institutions in emerging economy: An analysis of barriers and strategies,” Sustainable Futures, vol. 10, art. 101027, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101027.
- F. Ferdousi and P. Mahmud, “Role of social business in women entrepreneurship development in Bangladesh: Perspectives from Nobin Udyokta projects of Grameen Telecom Trust,” Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, vol. 9, art. 58, 2019, doi: 10.1186/s40497-019-0184-0.
- M. van Gelderen, “Entrepreneurship education for Gross National Happiness in Bhutan,” Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 218–234, 2024, doi: 10.1177/25151274231189445.
- Government of India, Startup India: Action Plan. New Delhi, India, 2016.
- Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India, National Education Policy 2020. New Delhi, India, 2020.
- NITI Aayog, Annual Report 2024–25. Government of India, New Delhi, India, 2025.
- Z. A. Paray and S. Kumar, “Does entrepreneurship education influence entrepreneurial intention among students in HEI’s? The role of age, gender and degree background,” Journal of International Education in Business, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 55–72, 2020, doi: 10.1108/JIEB-02-2019-0009.
- A. Reesha, D. Moosa, A. Shina, A. Sinaau, Z. Hassan, and M. Solih, “Course design, mentorship, skills, and students’ entrepreneurial aspirations: Evidence from Maldives HEIs,” Cogent Education, vol. 13, no. 1, art. 2641366, 2026, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2026.2641366.
- D. Subedi, B. Ghaju, and M. Sangraula, “Developing entrepreneurship knowledge and skills by Master of Technical and Vocational Education Training (MTEVT) students of Kathmandu University,” Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1–7, 2023.
- B. D. Lamichhane and P. B. Lama, “Factors affecting women’s entrepreneurial intention: An empirical examination of Nepalese perspective,” International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 39–47, 2024, doi: 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i5.3423.
- Higher Education Commission, Government of Pakistan, Undergraduate Education Policy, Version 1.1. Islamabad, Pakistan, 2023.
- Higher Education Commission, Government of Pakistan, Establishment of Business Incubation Centers 2025–26: Call for Proposals Guidance Document. Islamabad, Pakistan, 2025.
- S. Rafiq, A. Afzal, and K. Mehboob, “Policy-driven entrepreneurship education and student intentions: Evidence from Pakistan’s higher education reform,” Journal of Small Business Strategy, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 57–71, 2026, doi: 10.53703/001c.163479.
- A. Ud Din, S. H. Awan, M. Haleem, and S. H. Farooq, “Fostering startup projects through Business Incubation Centers in universities,” Cogent Business & Management, vol. 13, no. 1, art. 2650860, 2026, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2026.2650860.
- T. M. A. Tennakoon, K. Gunawardena, and S. P. Premaratne, “Challenges and constraints to enhance the entrepreneurship education in higher educational institutions of a developing country: Evidence from Sri Lanka,” Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 13–26, 2020, doi: 10.52283/NSWRCA.AJBMR.20200512A02.
Entrepreneurship education has become increasingly prominent across South Asia as governments and higher
education institutions seek to promote innovation, employability, self-employment, and entrepreneurial capability.
However, evidence from different regions is still inconsistent, and simply offering more entrepreneurship courses does not
guarantee better entrepreneurial learning or successful ventures. Building on previous regional policy analyses, this article
critically synthesizes entrepreneurship education in Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan,
and Sri Lanka, focusing on developments since 2018 and incorporating evidence available through 2026. The review is
organized around five recurring dimensions: policy commitment, institutional provision, curriculum and pedagogy,
entrepreneurial ecosystem integration, and gender and social inclusion. The literature on India and Pakistan highlights
relatively well-developed policy and institutional frameworks, whereas recent research on Bangladesh points to persistent
challenges related to curriculum design, institutional collaboration, and the broader entrepreneurial ecosystem. Emerging
evidence from Bangladesh and the Maldives further expands the discussion beyond entrepreneurial intention by
emphasizing employability, entrepreneurial skills, and capability development. However, the available evidence from
Afghanistan, Bhutan, Nepal, and some areas of Sri Lanka is limited or only covers certain institutions. Because of this, it is
not appropriate to make strong cross-national rankings. Across the region, a common lesson emerges: effective
entrepreneurship education depends less on the formal presence of courses than on the quality of learning, educator
capability, institutional support, experiential opportunities, ecosystem connections, and contextual relevance. Based on the
comparative synthesis, this article introduces a provisional Regional Entrepreneurship Education Strengthening
Framework that emphasizes policy-to-practice alignment, institutional capability, experiential pedagogy, ecosystem
connectivity, and inclusive participation.
Keywords :
Entrepreneurship Education; South Asia; Higher Education; Entrepreneurial Ecosystem; Experiential Learning; Entrepreneurship Policy; Inclusion; Entrepreneurial Competencies.