Authors : Julius Kirimi Muthuri; Lilian Mukiri Kirimi; Kirema Nkanata Mburugu; Aaron Kipngeno

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 9 - September

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/yc595f7f

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/bdekbmnv

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25sep008

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

Abstract : Access to safe and adequate sanitation remains a significant challenge in arid and semi-arid lands (ASALs), where harsh climatic conditions, chronic water scarcity, and poor infrastructure hinder sustainable service delivery. To address this issue, on-site sanitation facilities have gained global acceptance. However, studies indicate that faecal sludge from these systems is often poorly managed, resulting in widespread environmental contamination, groundwater pollution, and increased public health risks. The study investigated how environmental factors influence the management of faecal matter in Isiolo Sub-County, Kenya. A convergent mixed-methods design was adopted, combining household surveys and focus group discussions (FGDs) to capture quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Household heads (N=355) were selected using stratified and proportionate random sampling, while qualitative insights were gathered from purposively selected informants. Data were analysed in Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 26.0, using descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression, while qualitative data were thematically analysed and presented in narrative form. Findings showed that 46.5% of faecal matter was poorly managed, with regression analysis identifying rainfall (AOR = 0.825, p = 0.0315), space availability (AOR = 0.889, p = 0.036), and land use (AOR = 1.012, p = 0.013) as significant predictors. Qualitative data highlighted the collapse of temporary latrines during heavy rains, rocky soils limiting pit depth, and a lack of compound space for replacement pits. The study concludes that environmental conditions are critical to ASALs' sanitation sustainability. The study recommends that government and sanitation stakeholders adopt context-specific, climate-resilient sanitation technologies and integrate land-use planning with faecal sludge management strategies.

Keywords : Arid and Semi-Arid Areas, Faecal Matter, Environmental Factors, Onsite Sanitation, Kenya.

References :

1. Aquaya, (2019). Sanitation Policies, Practices and Preferences in Nakuru, Kenya. Retrieved from: https://www.wsup.com/content/uploads/2019/08/Sanitation_Nakuru_final.pdf.
2. Basika, E., Komakech, A. J., Nsubuga, M., & Kizito, S. (2024). Faecal sludge management practices in Uganda: challenges and opportunities. Int J Adv Res (IJSCIA), 5(3), 508-522.
3. Belete, B. E., Ambelu, A., & Addis, T. (2024). Factors influencing the adoption and utilization of latrines in Babille woreda, Somali region, Eastern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development, 14(2), 69-79.
4. Busienei, P. J., & Ogendi, G. M. (2019). Latrine structure, design, and conditions, and the practice of open defecation in Lodwar Town, Turkana County, Kenya: A quantitative methods research. Environmental Health Insights, 13, 1–9. DOI: 10.1177/1178630219887960
5. County Government of Isiolo (CGI). (2023). Isiolo County Integrated Development Plan 2023-2027 Retrieved from https://www.isiolo.go.ke/downloads
6. Dhadho, J., & Okeyo, I. (2023). Adoption of Sanitation Technologies in Tana Delta Sub-County, Kenya: The Environmental Factors’ Influence. World Journal of Public Health, 8(4), 305-309. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjph.20230804.18
7. Eliud, G. K., Kirimi, L. M., & Mburugu, K. N. (2023). Influence of social factors on adoption of sanitation practices in rural areas: a mixed methods study in Nzaui, Kenya. Pan African Medical Journal, 46(1).
8. Gitonga, F. K., Kanyepi, T., & Tanyanyiwa, V. I. (2022). Faecal sludge management for sustainable cities: Glimpses from Kenya. In W. Leal Filho (Ed.), Clean water and sanitation (pp. 1–14). Springer. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Vincent-Tanyanyiwa-2/publication/353914771_Faecal_Sludge_Management_for_Sustainable_Cities_Glimpses_from_Kenya/links/6118cc330c2bfa282a464a03/Faecal-Sludge-Management-for-Sustainable-Cities-Glimpses-from-Kenya.pd
9. Gituma, K. K. (2022). Tracking the flow of excreta across the sanitation service chain in Nkubu town. African Journal of Science, Technology and Social Sciences, 1(1).
10. Government of Kenya (GOK). (2023). National Sanitation Coverage Statistics by County. Ministry of Health.
11. Harper, J., Bielefeldt, A., Javernick-Will, A., Veasna, T., & Nicoletti, C. (2020). Context and intentions: practical associations for faecal sludge management in rural low-income Cambodia. Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development, 10(2), 191-201.
12. Hussein, M. M., Odongo, A. O., Kerochi, A., & Snuggs, J. (2023). Assessing factors associated with FSM practices among residents living in Baidoa, Somalia. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 10(11), 4004.
13. Kendi, C., Sumba, L., Huka, G. S., & Mirara, S.  (2022). Assessment of Challenges Experienced Among Households on Promotion of Sanitation Practices in Tigania West Sub County, Meru County, Kenya
14. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS). 2019 Kenya population and housing census, Volume I&II: Population by county, Sub-County and wards. Nairobi
15. Kipngeno Aaron; Patrick Kubai; Josephine Mutembei. "Social-Cultural Factors Influence on Management of Shared Sanitation, in Nakuru Town West Slums.” Volume. 9 Issue 8, August - 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT), www.ijisrt.com. ISSN - 2456-2165, PP:- 2613-2625, https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/ IJISRT24AUG1709
16. Kithuki, K., Opanga, Y., Watulo, E., & Marita, E. (2021). Water, sanitation and hygiene coverage and practices of a semi-arid county in the Eastern region of Kenya. Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development, 11(2), 327–334. https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2021.174
17. Legge, H., Halliday, K., Kepha, S., Mcharo, C., Witek-McManus, S., El‐Busaidy, H., & Oswald, W. (2021). Patterns and drivers of household sanitation access and sustainability in kwale county, kenya. Environmental Science & Technology, 55(9), 6052-6064. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05647
18. Lerebours, A., Scott, R., Sansom, K., & Kayaga, S. (2021). Regulating sanitation services in sub-saharan africa: An overview of the regulation of emptying and transport of faecal sludge in 20 cities and its implementation. Utilities Policy, 73, 101315
19. Maqbool, N., Shahid, M. A., & Khan, S. J. (2022). Situational Assessment for Faecal Sludge Management (FSM) in Pakistan.
20. Ministry of Health (MoH). (2016). Kenya Environmental Sanitation and Hygiene Policy 2016–2030. Nairobi, Kenya.
21. Mustapha, M., Okareh, O. T., Sridhar, M. K. C., & Aliyu, M. M. (2022). Households’ awareness and practices on water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) in an Arid Region of Northwestern Nigeria-Sokoto State. West African Journal of Applied Ecology, 30(2), 47-66.
22. Ngare, I. O., Karanja, J., Maina, S., & Gikonyo, S. (2024). Groundwater pollution and climate change vulnerability in Kenya: A review.
23. Nzouebet, W. A. L., Kengne, E. S., Wafo, G. V. D., Wanda, C., Rechenburg, A., & Noumsi, I. M. K. (2019). Assessment of the faecal sludge management practices in households of a sub-Saharan Africa urban area and the health risks associated: the case study of Yaoundé, Cameroon. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 13(5), 1-23.
24. Odagiri, M., Thomas, A., Listyasari, M., Mills, F., Bain, R., Muhammad, Z., … & Willetts, J. (2021). Safely managed on-site sanitation: a national assessment of sanitation services and potential faecal exposure in indonesia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(15), 8204. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18158204
25. Peal, A., Evans, B., Ahilan, S., Ban, R., Blackett, I., Hawkins, P., ... & Veses, O. (2020). Estimating safely managed sanitation in urban areas; lessons learned from a global implementation of excreta-flow diagrams. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 8, 1.
26. Rodrigues, E. A. M., Coutinho, A. P., de Souza, J. D. S., Costa, I. R. D. A., Neto, S. M. D. S., & Antonino, A. C. D. (2022). Rural Sanitation: scenarios and public policies for the brazilian semi-arid region. Sustainability, 14(12), 7157.
27. Rotowa, O. O., & Ayadi, P. A. (2020). Faecal sludge management in the residential cores of Akure,.Nigeria. J Environ Prot Sustain Dev, 6(2), 32-47
28. Sakas, Z., Uwah, E. A., Bhattrai, R. K., Garn, J. V., Gc, K. H., Mutta, A., ... & Freeman, M. C. (2022). Assessing sustainability factors for rural household sanitation coverage in Bhutan, Kenya, Nepal, and Zambia: a qualitative analysis. Global Health: Science and Practice, 10(6).
29. Simiyu, S., Chumo, I., & Mberu, B. (2021). Faecal sludge management in Low Income settlements: Case study of Nakuru, Kenya. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 750309.
30. Simiyu, S., Chumo, I., & Mberu, B. (2021). Faecal sludge management in low-income settlements: case study of Nakuru, Kenya. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 750309. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.750309
31. Sisay, S. F., Gari, S. R., & Ambelu, A. (2024). Faecal Sludge Management and Sanitation Safety: An Assessment in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Environmental Health Insights, 18, 11786302241267187.
32. Taherdoost, H. (2022). What are different research approaches? Comprehensive review of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method research, their applications, types, and limitations. Journal of Management Science & Engineering Research, 5(1), 53-63.
33. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). (2022). WASH in ASAL counties: Coverage and needs assessment. Nairobi: UNICEF Kenya. https://www.unicef.org/kenya
34. United States Agency for International Development. (2021). Approaches for sanitation access in pastoralist areas within the arid and semi-arid lands of Kenya. https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00XWKV.pdf
35. UN-Water. (2022). Human rights to water and sanitation. https://www.unwater.org/water-facts/human-rights-water-and-sanitation
36. Upane, J. L., Walubuka, E., & Amatu, M. (2024) Social and Cultural Factors Influencing Promotion of Latrine Utilization in Laisamis Sub-County, Marsabit, Kenya.
37. Water Services Regulatory Board (WASREB). (2022). Impact Report 14: Performance review of Kenya’s water services sector. https://wasreb.go.ke
38. Whitley, Lucy, Paul Hutchings, Sarah Cooper, Alison Parker, Abinet Kebede, Solome Joseph, John Butterworth, Barbara Van Koppen, and Adolph Mulejaa. "A framework for targeting water, sanitation and hygiene interventions in pastoralist populations in the Afar region of Ethiopia." International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 222, no. 8 (2019): 1133-1144.
39. WHO. (2024). Sanitation. World Health Organization Fact Sheet. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/sanitation
40. World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations International Children`s Emergency Fund (UNICEF) Joint Monitoring Program for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (JMP), 2023. Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene 2000-2022
41. Yamane, Taro, (1967). Statistics, An IntroductoryAnalysis,2nded., NewYork:Harper and Row.