Authors : Labba Awwabi; Siti Rochimah

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 2 - February

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/5h2273tc

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/mvxkp7bk

DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14965864

Abstract : In the dynamic realm of software development, efficient management of source code is pivotal for maintaining productivity and expediting release cycles. Version control systems, essential in this process, offer structured management of code changes. Among the various strategies for organizing repositories, Monorepo and Polyrepo configurations are particularly notable due to their distinct approaches to source code management. Despite their widespread adoption by leading technology enterprises, a definitive academic consensus on which configuration yields superior efficiency remains elusive. This research paper aims to address this gap by conducting a detailed comparative analysis of these configurations within the software development lifecycle, emphasizing development speed and operational efficiency. The study engaged 10 developers, divided into two groups, each alternating between Monorepo and Polyrepo setups. The tasks involved intricate updates to the logic determining maximum credit limits for students post-study leave, reflecting real-world software development challenges. Our empirical findings reveal that Monorepo configurations significantly outperform Polyrepo in terms of development speed, with Monorepo setups completing updates faster by an average of 14.3 minutes. This efficiency is attributed to the integrated structure of Monorepo, which facilitates simultaneous updates across services and minimizes the complexities associated with sequential deployments typical in Polyrepo setups. Moreover, the involvement of a researcher with direct experience in the project from its inception to the writing of this paper provided deep insights into the practical implications of each setup. This study not only underscores the operational efficiencies of Monorepo over Polyrepo but also highlights how familiarity with the project can influence development speed. These findings provide crucial insights for organizations looking to optimize their software development practices through strategic repository management and suggest areas for future research, including the long-term impacts on team collaboration, code quality, and maintenance overhead.

Keywords : Monorepo, Polyrepo, Software Development Lifecycle, Development Speed , Repository Management.

References :

1. Aleksandrov, M., & Petrova, M. (2021). Multi-Website Single-Repository Architecture for E-Journal Web Platform. 2021 IEEE 8th International Conference on Problems of Infocommunications, Science and Technology, PIC S and T 2021 - Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1109/PICST54195.2021.9772108.
2. Alzayed, A., & Khalfan, A. (2022). Understanding Top Management Involvement in SDLC Phases. Journal of Software. https://doi.org/10.17706/jsw.17.3.87-120.
3. Brito, G., Terra, R., & Valente, M. T. (2018). Monorepos: A Multivocal Literature Review. http://scholar.google.com/
4. Brousse, N. (2019). The issue of monorepo and polyrepo in large enterprises. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328433.3328435.
5. Byrne, K., & Cevenini, A. (2023). Aligning DevOps Concepts with Agile Models of the Software Development Life Cycle (SLDC) in Pursuit of Continuous Regulatory Compliance. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 1029 LNEE. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29078-7_32.
6. de Lauretis, L. (2019). From monolithic architecture to microservices architecture. Proceedings - 2019 IEEE 30th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops, ISSREW 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSREW.2019.00050.
7. Fritzsch, J., Bogner, J., Wagner, S., & Zimmermann, A. (2019). Microservices Migration in Industry: Intentions, Strategies, and Challenges. Proceedings - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution, ICSME 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSME.2019.00081.
8. Ghumatkar, R. S., & Date, A. (2023). Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC). International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 11(11). https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2023.56554.
9. Haque, S., Eberhart, Z., Bansal, A., & McMillan, C. (2022). Semantic Similarity Metrics for Evaluating Source Code Summarization. IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension, 2022-March, 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1145/nnnnnnn.nnnnnnn.
10. Jacob, A. (2019, January 3). Monorepo: please do!. Medium. https://medium.com/@adamhjk/monorepo-please-do-3657e08a4b70.
11. Jain, P., Sharma, A., & Ahuja, L. (2018). The Impact of Agile Software Development Process on the Quality of Software Product. 2018 7th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization: Trends and Future Directions, ICRITO 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRITO.2018.8748529
12. Johnson, J., Lubo, S., Yedla, N., Aponte, J., & Sharif, B. (2019). An Empirical Study Assessing Source Code Readability in Comprehension. Proceedings - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution, ICSME 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSME.2019.00085.
13. Klein, M. (2019, January 2). Monorepos: Please don’t!. Medium. https://medium.com/@mattklein123/monorepos-please-dont-e9a279be011b
14. Kokrehel, G., & Bilicki, V. (2022). The impact of the software architecture on the developer productivity. Pollack Periodica, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1556/606.2021.00372.
15. Kula, E., Greuter, E., van Deursen, A., & Gousios, G. (2022). Factors Affecting On-Time Delivery in Large-Scale Agile Software Development. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 48(9). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2021.3101192.
16. López, L., Burgués, X., Martínez-Fernández, S., Vollmer, A. M., Behutiye, W., Karhapää, P., Franch, X., Rodríguez, P., & Oivo, M. (2022). Quality measurement in agile and rapid software development: A systematic mapping. Journal of Systems and Software, 186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.111187.
17. Olorunshola, O. E., & Ogwueleka, F. N. (2022). Review of System Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Models for Effective Application Delivery. In Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (Vol. 191). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0739-4_28.
18. Piantadosi, V., Fierro, F., Scalabrino, S., Serebrenik, A., & Oliveto, R. (2020). How does code readability change during software evolution? Empirical Software Engineering, 25(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-020-09886-9.
19. Scalabrino, S., Linares-Vásquez, M., Oliveto, R., & Poshyvanyk, D. (2018). A comprehensive model for code readability. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 30(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.1958.
20. Shakikhanli, U., & Bilicki, V. (2022). Comparison between mono and multi repository structures. Pollack Periodica, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.1556/606.2022.00526.
21. Stocker, M., & Zimmermann, O. (2021). From Code Refactoring to API Refactoring: Agile Service Design and Evolution. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1429 CCIS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87568-8_11