Authors :
Sayak Biswas
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 9 - September
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/4h9xne9n
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/2776dex8
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25sep1452
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.
Abstract :
we present a comparative analysis of two photometric calibration methods which is used to calculate the effective
temperature and the uncertainties of 109 stars present in both Hipparcos and Gaia Dr3 catalogue .Stellar effective
temperature were computed with (i) the color-temperature relation of Flower(1996)[5],which only uses B-V,and
(ii)Casagrande(2010)[6] calibration that incorporates [Fe/H]. Values of B-V were taken from Hipparcos[3] and its input
uncertainties were prop- agated through independent Monte Carlo [4] sampling(For input uncertainties of [Fe/H] their DR3
percentiles were converted to equivalent 1 sigma error which were propagated).(Gaia Dr3[2] effective temperature and
uncertainties taken as refer- ence) by examining systematic offsets,scatter,the behaviour of normalised residuals and by
testing how differences depends on metalicity.We must note that B-V used here are undereddened nor systematic correction
was used to rectify either of the calibrations and Gaia itself has systematic uncertainties.
References :
- G. Torres, J. Andersen, A. Gim´enez, “Accurate masses and radii of normal stars: modern results,” Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, vol. 18 (2010), pp. 67–126.
- Gaia Collaboration, A. Vallenari, A. G. A. Brown, et al., “Gaia Data Re- lease 3: Summary of the content and survey properties,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 674 (2023), A1.
- M. A. C. Perryman, L. Lindegren, J. Kovalevsky, et al., “The Hipparcos Catalogue,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 323 (1997), L49–L52.
- W. K. Hastings, “Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications,” Biometrika, vol. 57, no. 1 (1970), pp. 97–109.
- P. J. Flower, “Transformations from theoretical Hertzsprung–Russell dia- grams to color–magnitude diagrams: effective temperatures, B–V colors, and bolometric corrections,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 469, pp. 355–365, 1996. doi:10.1086/177785
- L. Casagrande, I. Ram´ırez, J. Mel´endez, M. Bessell, and M. Asplund, ”An absolutely calibrated T eff scale from the infrared flux method. Dwarfs and subgiants,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 512, p. A54, 2010. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913204
- G. Torres, ”On the use of empirical bolometric corrections for stars,” The Astronomical Journal, vol. 140, pp. 1158–1162, 2010. doi:10.1088/0004- 6256/140/5/1158
we present a comparative analysis of two photometric calibration methods which is used to calculate the effective
temperature and the uncertainties of 109 stars present in both Hipparcos and Gaia Dr3 catalogue .Stellar effective
temperature were computed with (i) the color-temperature relation of Flower(1996)[5],which only uses B-V,and
(ii)Casagrande(2010)[6] calibration that incorporates [Fe/H]. Values of B-V were taken from Hipparcos[3] and its input
uncertainties were prop- agated through independent Monte Carlo [4] sampling(For input uncertainties of [Fe/H] their DR3
percentiles were converted to equivalent 1 sigma error which were propagated).(Gaia Dr3[2] effective temperature and
uncertainties taken as refer- ence) by examining systematic offsets,scatter,the behaviour of normalised residuals and by
testing how differences depends on metalicity.We must note that B-V used here are undereddened nor systematic correction
was used to rectify either of the calibrations and Gaia itself has systematic uncertainties.