Authors : Dr. Jan Vincent S. Carmen

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 10 - October

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/4hfur5p2

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/ysn72cap

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25oct251

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

Abstract : This study evaluated a proposed instructional module on Dispute Resolution and Crises/Incidents Management as a tool for enhancing course delivery in Criminology through the Outcome-Based Education (OBE) framework. Anchored on Sustainable Development Goal 4 (Quality Education) and guided by CHED Memorandum Order No. 5, series of 2018, the research was conducted by a single researcher and involved 272 third-year BS Criminology students from the Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology during the First Semester of Academic Year 2025–2026. Using complete enumeration and a validated evaluation instrument, respondents assessed the module across six components: Module Title, Learning Objectives, Setting Up, Content, References, and Assessment of Learning. Results showed consistently high mean scores across all components, with grand means ranging from 4.40 to 4.45, interpreted as “Strongly Agree.” Key strengths included clarity of module titles, relevance of objectives, applied learning activities, and credible references. Minor areas for improvement were noted in the diversity of materials, accessibility of sources, and provision of pre-assessments. Findings affirm the module’s alignment with OBE principles and its potential to enhance student engagement and learning outcomes. To further enhance learning outcomes, it is recommended that the module incorporate more multimedia content, clarify assessment instructions, and include pre-assessment tools to better tailor instruction to student readiness. This study contributes to the continuous improvement of Criminology education by promoting structured, learner-centered instructional design focused on real-world competencies in peacekeeping and conflict management.

Keywords : Dispute Resolution, Crises Management, Incidents Management, Outcome-based Education, BS Criminology.

References :

1. Balo, V. T. M. and J. M. P. Sanchez, 2025. Evaluation of educational assessment module for flexible STEM education. STEM Educ., 5(1):130–151. https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2025007
2. Ellis, J., et al., 2024. Course design as a stronger predictor of student evaluation of quality and student engagement than teacher ratings. High. Educ., 88:1997–2013.
3. García, A. J., F. A. Froment and M. R. Bohórquez, 2023. University teacher credibility as a strategy to motivate students. J. New Approaches Educ. Res., 12:292–306.
4. Hepher, B. and Y. Pruginin, 1981. Commercial Fish Farming. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 261 pp.
5. Li, H., X. Yu, Y. Sun and H. Yang, 2024. Impact of active learning instruction in blended learning on students’ anxiety levels and performance. Front. Educ., 9:Article 1332778.
6. Patiño, A., M. S. Ramírez-Montoya and M. Buenestado-Fernández, 2023. Active learning and education 4.0 for complex thinking training: Analysis of two case studies in open education. Smart Learn. Environ., 10:Article 8.
7. QA Instructional Designer & Research Scholar, 2024. The impact of cognitive load theory on the effectiveness of microlearning modules. Eur. J. Educ. Pedag., 5(2):Article 799.
8. Rawlings, C., A. Mohammed and H. Al Hammadi, 2025. Assessing learning management system success in UAE universities: How quality measures link to students’ academic performance. Front. Educ., 10:Article 1154321.
9. ScienceDirect, 2023. Role of course relevance and course content quality in MOOCs acceptance and use. Comput. Educ. Open, 5:Article 100147.
10. Sheridan, D., 2023. Designing online teaching curriculum to optimise learning for all students in higher education. Curric. J., 34(2):239–255.
11. Student-Centered Active Learning Study, 2023. Student-centered active learning improves performance in solving higher-level cognitive questions in health sciences education. Health Sci. Educ. J. [MDPI].
12. Tadesse, T. and R. M. Gillies, 2021. Active learning strategies and their effects on students’ motivation in higher education. Int. J. Educ. Res. Open, 2:100043.
13. Unknown Author, 2023. Alignment analysis of teaching–learning–assessment within the classroom: How teachers implement project-based learning under the curriculum standards. Discip. Interdiscip. Sci. Educ. Res.
14. Unknown Author, 2023. Effective feedback and assessment strategies. Module on designing assessments (Module 2). https://sites.google.com/view/effective-feedback-and-assessm/module-2
15. Unknown Author, 2024. Constructive alignment in a graduate-level project management course: An innovative framework using large language models. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ.
16. Unknown Author, 2024. Pre-service teachers evaluating online texts about learning styles: There is room for improvement in justifying the credibility. Front. Educ.
17. Unknown Author, 2025. The impact of teaching materials on instructional design and teacher development. Front. Educ.