Evaluation of Paris Metro & Shadow Pricing as a Congestion Management Scheme in Packets Based Network


Authors : Yekini Olawale Saheed; Koledoye Titus Olugbenga; Muibi Kehinde Abdulahi

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 12 - December


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/4425vx82

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/5xwpuk5d

DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14810097


Abstract : Network congestion is becoming a serious issue due to the constantly increasing demand for mobile services offered by GSM communications. GSM congestion needs to be reduced or controlled since it is extremely important. Numerous efforts have been undertaken to prevent and control congestion in cellular networks, such as the GSM network. This research intends to combine Paris metro pricing and Shadow pricing scheme in management of congestion of packets in GSM. The experimental result is simulated and evaluated using flutter framework application. The application consists of a single page with multiple widgets to display information about the simulation. The two dynamic pricing methods' respective performances are shown. The outcome demonstrates that shadow pricing is a more effective way to control traffic. The combination of Paris metro price and shadow pricing successfully reduced traffic and increased income.

Keywords : GSM, Congestion, Flutter, Cellular, Radio, Shadow Pricing, Paris Metro Pricing.

References :

  1. Agbo J.C , Ezeali P.C, Erhunmwunsee O.D, Bande P.S, Amaechi N.E , Orji U.E, Chira,  G.U(2021) Congestion Control Mechanism in GSM Telecommunication: A Review
  2. Alabi, I.K., Sagir, L., Fatai, O.A., and Alabi, I.I.,(2017). GSM Quality of Service Performance in Abuja, Nigeria.International Journal of Computer Science, Engineering and Applications(IJCSEA) vol 7, no 3-4.
  3. Alarape. M.A, Akinwale, A.T, and Folorunso,O.(2011) ‘’ A Combined Scheme for Controlling GSM Network Calls Congestion’’, International Journal of Computer Applications,  vol.14, pp 0975 – 8887.  
  4. Andrew Odlyzko (1997); AT & T lAbs Research. A Modest Proposal for Preventing Internet Congestion
  5. Bouch, A. et al (2000). “Packets and people: A User-Central Approach to Quality of   Service, Proceedings 8th int’l workshop on quality of service (IWQoS) springer Verlag, Heidelberg.189-197
  6. Chang.C.S (2005), “Performance Guarantee in Communication Network”. Springevverlay, NY pp 122-150
  7. C. K. Chau and K. M. Sim (2003), “Analyzing the Impact of Selfish Behaviors of Internet Users and Operators,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 7, no. 9, 463–465
  8. Clark, (D.D (2008). Adding Service Discrimination to the Internet.vol 5
  9. Easley R, Guo H, Krämer J (2018) From Network Neutrality to Data Neutrality: A Techno-Economic Framework and Research Agenda. Information Systems Research 29(2):  253–272.
  10. Garg, V.K., and Wikes, J.E (2015). “Wireless and Personal Communication Systems, Prentice hall”
  11. Gibbens, R.J et al (2000). Multiproduct Competition between Congestible Networks. Discussion Paper in Economics and Econometrics
  12. Gupta, A. et al (2001). Priority pricing of integrated service networks. In L.W. Mcknight & J.P. Bailey, internet economics. Cambridge, Massachusettes. MIT press
  13. H. Sakurai, S. Kasahara, and N. Adachi (2003). “Internet pricing and user opt-out strategy under two ISPs competition,” in Proc. Intl. Network Optimization Conf. (INOC), 495–500
  14. Ioannis D. Paschalidis and John .N. Tsitsiklis (2000). Congestion-dependent Pricing of  Network Services, IEEE/ACM transactions on networking Vol 8.
  15. Kelly, F.P (2001). Reversibility and Stochastic Networks. 223-228
  16. Konstain et al (2003) “Radio Resource Management Schemes for Combines GSM /GPRS Mobile by stems”, Wireless Communication Mobile Computing Journal; 357-384
  17. Kuboye, B.M, Olufemi, D. and Odigan, K (2020). Congestion Management in Long Term  Evolution using Prioritized Scheduling Algorithm; European Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science. Vol 7, no 2
  18. Johansson, H and Steensland. A(2012). Performance Characteristics of Load Balancing Algorithms for Parallel SAMR Applications. Retrieved from.www.it.uu.se/research/publications/l ic/2006-010/paperC.pdf.
  19. Louis E. Frenzel Jr.(2016). Principles of Electronic communication systems. 4th Edition, Published by MC Graw-hill education. NY1021
  20. Oreizy. P et al(2008), “Runtime Software  Adaptive Framework, Approaches and Styles, proceeding  Int’l conf. software eng
  21. Poopoola, J.J., Megbowen, I.O and Adeloye, V.S.A.(2009) ‘ Performance Evaluation and Improvement on Quality of Service of Global System for Mobile Communication in Nigeria’ vol.9, no 2, 91-106.
  22. Rakesh, K.S and Ranjan (2016). 4G LTE Cellular Technology Network Architecture and Mobile Standards, International Journal of Engineering Research in Management and Technology, 5-15
  23. Tilevich . E et al (2009): Enhancing Java programs with distribution capabilities, “ACM Trans. Software eng and methodology. vol 19, no1, pp1-40.
  24. Tristan Henderson et.al (2000). Congestion Pricing Paying your Way in Communication Networks. University College London
  25. Whitehead J. (2000). Cellular System Design: An Emerging discipline. IEEE Communications Magazine 24:8-15
  26. Williams C.Y. Lee (2012). Mobile Cellular Telecommunication Systems. Mc Graw-hill Company Network. pp 47-50

Network congestion is becoming a serious issue due to the constantly increasing demand for mobile services offered by GSM communications. GSM congestion needs to be reduced or controlled since it is extremely important. Numerous efforts have been undertaken to prevent and control congestion in cellular networks, such as the GSM network. This research intends to combine Paris metro pricing and Shadow pricing scheme in management of congestion of packets in GSM. The experimental result is simulated and evaluated using flutter framework application. The application consists of a single page with multiple widgets to display information about the simulation. The two dynamic pricing methods' respective performances are shown. The outcome demonstrates that shadow pricing is a more effective way to control traffic. The combination of Paris metro price and shadow pricing successfully reduced traffic and increased income.

Keywords : GSM, Congestion, Flutter, Cellular, Radio, Shadow Pricing, Paris Metro Pricing.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe