Authors :
Yekini Olawale Saheed; Koledoye Titus Olugbenga; Muibi Kehinde Abdulahi
Volume/Issue :
Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 12 - December
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/4425vx82
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/5xwpuk5d
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14810097
Abstract :
Network congestion is becoming a serious issue due to the constantly increasing demand for mobile services offered
by GSM communications. GSM congestion needs to be reduced or controlled since it is extremely important. Numerous efforts
have been undertaken to prevent and control congestion in cellular networks, such as the GSM network. This research intends
to combine Paris metro pricing and Shadow pricing scheme in management of congestion of packets in GSM. The
experimental result is simulated and evaluated using flutter framework application. The application consists of a single page
with multiple widgets to display information about the simulation. The two dynamic pricing methods' respective performances
are shown. The outcome demonstrates that shadow pricing is a more effective way to control traffic. The combination of Paris
metro price and shadow pricing successfully reduced traffic and increased income.
Keywords :
GSM, Congestion, Flutter, Cellular, Radio, Shadow Pricing, Paris Metro Pricing.
References :
- Agbo J.C , Ezeali P.C, Erhunmwunsee O.D, Bande P.S, Amaechi N.E , Orji U.E, Chira, G.U(2021) Congestion Control Mechanism in GSM Telecommunication: A Review
- Alabi, I.K., Sagir, L., Fatai, O.A., and Alabi, I.I.,(2017). GSM Quality of Service Performance in Abuja, Nigeria.International Journal of Computer Science, Engineering and Applications(IJCSEA) vol 7, no 3-4.
- Alarape. M.A, Akinwale, A.T, and Folorunso,O.(2011) ‘’ A Combined Scheme for Controlling GSM Network Calls Congestion’’, International Journal of Computer Applications, vol.14, pp 0975 – 8887.
- Andrew Odlyzko (1997); AT & T lAbs Research. A Modest Proposal for Preventing Internet Congestion
- Bouch, A. et al (2000). “Packets and people: A User-Central Approach to Quality of Service, Proceedings 8th int’l workshop on quality of service (IWQoS) springer Verlag, Heidelberg.189-197
- Chang.C.S (2005), “Performance Guarantee in Communication Network”. Springevverlay, NY pp 122-150
- C. K. Chau and K. M. Sim (2003), “Analyzing the Impact of Selfish Behaviors of Internet Users and Operators,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 7, no. 9, 463–465
- Clark, (D.D (2008). Adding Service Discrimination to the Internet.vol 5
- Easley R, Guo H, Krämer J (2018) From Network Neutrality to Data Neutrality: A Techno-Economic Framework and Research Agenda. Information Systems Research 29(2): 253–272.
- Garg, V.K., and Wikes, J.E (2015). “Wireless and Personal Communication Systems, Prentice hall”
- Gibbens, R.J et al (2000). Multiproduct Competition between Congestible Networks. Discussion Paper in Economics and Econometrics
- Gupta, A. et al (2001). Priority pricing of integrated service networks. In L.W. Mcknight & J.P. Bailey, internet economics. Cambridge, Massachusettes. MIT press
- H. Sakurai, S. Kasahara, and N. Adachi (2003). “Internet pricing and user opt-out strategy under two ISPs competition,” in Proc. Intl. Network Optimization Conf. (INOC), 495–500
- Ioannis D. Paschalidis and John .N. Tsitsiklis (2000). Congestion-dependent Pricing of Network Services, IEEE/ACM transactions on networking Vol 8.
- Kelly, F.P (2001). Reversibility and Stochastic Networks. 223-228
- Konstain et al (2003) “Radio Resource Management Schemes for Combines GSM /GPRS Mobile by stems”, Wireless Communication Mobile Computing Journal; 357-384
- Kuboye, B.M, Olufemi, D. and Odigan, K (2020). Congestion Management in Long Term Evolution using Prioritized Scheduling Algorithm; European Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science. Vol 7, no 2
- Johansson, H and Steensland. A(2012). Performance Characteristics of Load Balancing Algorithms for Parallel SAMR Applications. Retrieved from.www.it.uu.se/research/publications/l ic/2006-010/paperC.pdf.
- Louis E. Frenzel Jr.(2016). Principles of Electronic communication systems. 4th Edition, Published by MC Graw-hill education. NY1021
- Oreizy. P et al(2008), “Runtime Software Adaptive Framework, Approaches and Styles, proceeding Int’l conf. software eng
- Poopoola, J.J., Megbowen, I.O and Adeloye, V.S.A.(2009) ‘ Performance Evaluation and Improvement on Quality of Service of Global System for Mobile Communication in Nigeria’ vol.9, no 2, 91-106.
- Rakesh, K.S and Ranjan (2016). 4G LTE Cellular Technology Network Architecture and Mobile Standards, International Journal of Engineering Research in Management and Technology, 5-15
- Tilevich . E et al (2009): Enhancing Java programs with distribution capabilities, “ACM Trans. Software eng and methodology. vol 19, no1, pp1-40.
- Tristan Henderson et.al (2000). Congestion Pricing Paying your Way in Communication Networks. University College London
- Whitehead J. (2000). Cellular System Design: An Emerging discipline. IEEE Communications Magazine 24:8-15
- Williams C.Y. Lee (2012). Mobile Cellular Telecommunication Systems. Mc Graw-hill Company Network. pp 47-50
Network congestion is becoming a serious issue due to the constantly increasing demand for mobile services offered
by GSM communications. GSM congestion needs to be reduced or controlled since it is extremely important. Numerous efforts
have been undertaken to prevent and control congestion in cellular networks, such as the GSM network. This research intends
to combine Paris metro pricing and Shadow pricing scheme in management of congestion of packets in GSM. The
experimental result is simulated and evaluated using flutter framework application. The application consists of a single page
with multiple widgets to display information about the simulation. The two dynamic pricing methods' respective performances
are shown. The outcome demonstrates that shadow pricing is a more effective way to control traffic. The combination of Paris
metro price and shadow pricing successfully reduced traffic and increased income.
Keywords :
GSM, Congestion, Flutter, Cellular, Radio, Shadow Pricing, Paris Metro Pricing.