Authors : Sipur; Husna Gemasih; Ira Zulfa; Eliyin; Richasanty Septima; Fajrillah

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 6 - June

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/s2m3w8nv

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/v69n6xpb

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUN1412

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : The field of auditing is concerned with providing auditing services, which is an independent and systematic process of assessing and improving the financial health of a company or agency. This manuscript describes the development of experimental auditing research and points out recent lines of investigation. The sources of this article are various experimental audit studies published globally between the 1970s and 2000s. The nature of experimental audit research (REP), the growth of REP internationally, current topics in REP, and the evolution of REP in Indonesia are the sections of this article. REPs that can be developed in the future include how to present audit information, fraud assessment, analytical procedures, interactions between auditors and clients (negotiations and agreements), and interactions between auditors (brainstorming). This is based on research on various REPs conducted at the international level.

Keywords : Auditing Experimental Research, Experimental Method, Evolution.

References :

1. Achmad, B. (2012). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kualitas Hasil Pemeriksaan Audit Sektor Publik (Studi Empiris pada BPKP Perwakilan Jawa Tengah). Dinamika Akuntansi Keuangan Vol 1 No 2.
2. Anesia Putri Kinanti.(2013). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi dan Motivasi Auditor terhadap Pertimbangan Tingkat Materialitas dalam suatu Pengauditan Laporan Keuangan, 58-72.
3. Jefry MAULANA. (2022). Pengaruh Tekanan Waktu Pengauditan, Kompetensi Auditor, dan Independensi Auditor terhadap Kualitas Audit.
4. Atiqoh, N., & Riduwan, A. (2016). Pengaruh Due Professional Care, Motivasi Auditor, Time Budget Pressure terhadap Kualitas Audit. Jurnal Ilmu dan Riset Akuntansi Vol 5 No 2.
5. Campbell, D. T. dan J. C. Stanley. (1966). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Boston, Mass: Houghton Mifflin Company.
6. Sidiq Ashari, Eka Noor Asmara, Supardi Supardi.( 2019). Self Esteem, Self Efficacy Dan Prestasi Akademik Mahasiswa Akuntansi: Studi Pada Kelas Pengauditan, 23-40.
7. Aqmarina, C. M., Ibrahim, N., & Cut , R. (2022). Pengaruh Pengalaman, Independensi, Dan Fee Audit Terhadap Kualitas Audit Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik Di Banda Aceh. Serambi Konstruktivis , Volume 4, No.2.
8. Tri Ramaraya Koroy. (2008). Pendeteksian kondisi (fraud) laporan keuangan oleh auditor eksternal, 22-23
9. Yulius Jogi Christiawan. ( 2000). Konsep Pengauditan Dalam Lingkungan Pengelohan Data Akuntansi Terkomputerisasi, 9-20.
10. Etika, C., Ermawati, L., & Bustami, J. (2022). Analisis Pengaruh Independensi Auditor dan Pendidikan Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit Syariah Pada Perbankan Syariah Di Indonesia. SYARIKAT: JURNAL RUMPUN EKONOMI SYARIAH VOL. 5 NO. 1.
11. Ester Putri Gita Pratiwi, Bernadetta Diana. (2021). Pengaruh Kematerialitasan Kecurangan DanTingkat Retaliation Terhadap Intensi Auditor Internal Dalam Melakukan Whistleblowig, 1-17.
12. Tan Ming Kuang, Se Tin.(2010).Perkembangan Riset Akuntansi Keperilakuan Studi Pada Jurnal Behavioral Research In Accounting (1998-2003), 122-133.
13. Mayar Afriyenti, Vita Fitria Sari. ( 2018). Kapan Profesi Auditor Internal diminati? Pengujian Eksperimen terhadap Label Pekerjaan, Peran Auditor Internal dan Prospek Karir, 69-86.
14. Dini Rosdini, Hamzah Ritchi, Pera Yulianingsih. ( 2022). Metode Riset Eksperimen Akuntansi dan Bisnis.
15. Fitri Wulandari, Sigit Hermawan, Hadiah Fitriyah, Nurasik Nurasik. ( 2022). A Literature Review: Riset Akuntansi Keperilakuan Di Indonesia, 157-175.
16. Yuniarti, Tiyas, Purweni Widhianningrum, dan Nur Wahyuning Sulistyowati. (2020). “A Study of Accounting Learning Achievements Using Emotional Intelligence and Learning Behavior.” Assets: Jurnal Akuntansi dan Pendidikan 9(1): 52.
17. Wijayanti, Dwi Marlina, dan Fachmi Pachlevi Yandra. (2020). “The Role of Incentives , Emotional Connection , and Organizational Justice in Establishing an Effective Whistleblowing System : An Experimental Study.” Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi dan Bisnis7(1): 51–68.
18. Amalia, Razikah et al. (2018). “Review Perkembangan Riset Topik Motivasi Selama Sepuluh Tahun Terakhir pada Tri Jurnal Online Usakti.” Seminar Nasional Cendekiawan ke 4 4(2): 1155–61.
19. Utami, I. and S. Wijono. (2014). Study in Decision Making Model on Information Presentation by Clients’ Management: Experimental Test on Halo and Recency Effect. Journal of Economics, Business & Ac.
20. Yuniza Wulandari Yuriski, Cris Kuntadi. ( 2022). Pengaruh Independensi, Kompetensi, Dan Implementasi Teknik Audit Berbantuan Komputer Terhadap Kualitas Audit, 932-937.
21. Kelton, A. S., R. R. Pennington, and B. M. Tuttle. (2010). The effects of information presentation format on judgment and decision making: A review of the information systems research. 24 (2): 79–105.
22. Nahartyo, E dan I. Utami. (2014). Panduan Praktis Riset Eksperimen. Penerbit Indeks. Jakarta.
23. Wit H. D., R. M. Hogarth, J. J. Koehler dan D. J. Luchins. (1989). Effect of diazepam on a belief – updating task. Psychological Reports 64: 219-226.
24. Ningsih, Sulia. (2020). Persepsi Mahasiswa Terhadap Pembelajaran Daring Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. JINOTEP Vol 7.
25. Grammling, A., O’Donnel, E., and Vandervalde, S. (2010). Audit Partner Evaluation of Compensating Controls: A Focus on Design Effectiveness and Extent of Auditor Testing. Behavioral Research in Accounting. Vol. 29: 175-187.
26. O’Donnell, E., dan J. D. Perkins. (2011). Assessing risk with analytical procedures: do systems-thinking tools help auditors focus on diagnostic patterns?. A Journal Of Practice & Theory Volume 30 Nomor 4: 273-283.
27. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2010). Auditing Standards Related to the Auditor’s Assessment of and Response to Risk. Washington, D.C.: Securities and Exchange Commission.Release No. 2010-004.