Authors :
Kennedy Mulwanda; Dr. Kelvin Chibomba
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 1 - January
Google Scholar :
https://shorturl.at/aO22M
Scribd :
https://rb.gy/jn94vh
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jan610
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
The study examined the effectiveness of green technology implementation in residential housing construction
projects, using Saloba Ltd in Kitwe District as a case study. It was guided by three objectives: current state of adoption,
effects of implementation, and determine challenges. A descriptive research design was employed, targeting employees and
stakeholders of Saloba Ltd. Stratified and simple random sampling techniques were applied to ensure fair representation,
with a sample size of 50 respondents. Data was collected through structured questionnaires and analyzed using STATA and
SPSS. Findings revealed a growing interest in sustainable housing solutions, with modular green housing designs (36%) and
affordable off-grid systems (30%) emerging as the most preferred, together accounting for 66% of future adoption trends.
However, adoption was constrained, as 36% of respondents viewed the trend as stable and 28% saw it as slowly increasing
due to limited awareness and training. Environmental concerns (40%) were identified as the strongest driver of adoption,
while material preferences leaned toward locally sourced timber (30%) and eco-friendly roofing materials (28%). Digital
tools such as mobile energy-monitoring apps (34%) and BIM (28%) were also highly regarded.
The effects of adoption were linked mainly to prestige (34%) and improved health/comfort (32%), while financial
savings (18%) and environmental conservation (16%) were secondary. Key challenges included performance uncertainties
(26%), limited materials (22%), high costs (14%), regulatory delays (32%), and weak enforcement (30%). In conclusion,
meaningful progress in green housing adoption requires stronger policies, better infrastructure, and collaboration among
government, policymakers, and construction companies.
Keywords :
Green Technology, Implementation, Housing, Construction, Projects and Challenges.
References :
- Adebayo, A. (2019). Sustainable construction practices in Africa: Challenges and prospects. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 24(2), 45–58.
- African Economic Outlook. (2020). Zambia Economic Outlook 2020: Sustaining economic growth through infrastructure development. African Development Bank Group.
- Cai, W., Lai, K. H., Liu, C., Wei, F., & Ma, M. (2019). Green building practices and their environmental impact: A global assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117676
- De Boeck, L. (2018). Urbanization and sustainable housing development in sub-Saharan Africa. Habitat International, 82, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.10.004
- Djokoto, S. D., Dadzie, J., &Ohemeng-Ababio, E. (2019). Barriers to sustainable construction in developing countries: Evidence from Ghana. Journal of Sustainable Development, 12(1), 15–28.
- Musonda, I., &Mbewe, P. (2022). Challenges of adopting green technologies in Zambia’s construction sector. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 9(3), 57–68.
- Nwokoro, I., &Onukube, H. (2018). Sustainable building design: A strategy for environmental management in developing countries. Environmental Management and Sustainable Development, 7(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5296/emsd.v7i2.13078
- Reposa, M. (2019). Trends in green building adoption: A comparative study between developing and developed nations. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 21(4), 501–517.
- Roy, U., & Gupta, A. (2018). Eco-friendly construction and the future of sustainable housing. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 15(10), 2181–2194.
- United Nations (UN). (2019). Zambia Green Jobs Programme: Promoting sustainable construction and employment creation. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).
- World Architecture News. (2019). Global green building report: 10,000 certified structures worldwide. Retrieved from https://www.worldarchitecturenews.com
- Aghimien, D. O., Aigbavboa, C. O., &Thwala, W. D. (2018). Green building materials adoption in developing countries: Challenges and prospects. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 16(2), 345–361.
- Akin, O., & Akin, S. (2022). Green investments and sustainable practices in the UK real estate industry. Journal of Sustainable Real Estate, 14(1), 23–45.
- Ametepey, S., Aigbavboa, C., &Ansah, R. (2015). Sustainable construction in sub-Saharan Africa: Policy, practice, and challenges. International Journal of Construction Management, 15(4), 285–296.
- Agyekum, K., Osei-Tutu, E., &Mensah, S. (2020). Supply chain constraints in adopting green building technologies in developing countries. Sustainable Cities and Society, 61, 102302.
- Azhar, S., Carlton, W. A., Olsen, D., & Ahmad, I. (2011). Building environment-friendly: Green building design and construction practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(11), 1232–1240.
- Chan, E. H. W., Chau, C. K., & Leung, M. Y. (2016). Barriers to implementing green building technologies in developing countries. Energy and Buildings, 133, 112–120.
- Cheelo, C., &Liebenthal, A. (2018). The evolution of Zambia’s construction sector: Growth, challenges, and sustainability prospects. African Development Review, 30(S1), 134–148.
- Ding, G. K. C. (2008). Sustainable construction—The role of environmental assessment tools. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(3), 451–464.
- Dosumu, O., &Aigbavboa, C. (2018). Sustainable construction adoption in Zambia: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 23(1), 1–20.
- Dwaikat, L. N., & Ali, K. N. (2016). Green building cost premium: Drivers and implications. Sustainable Cities and Society, 26, 183–192
- Elizabeth, M., Wu, H., &Ojo, O. (2016). Greening the construction industry in Nigeria: Sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Construction Project Management, 6(2), 55–72.
- Geng, Y., Fu, J., Sarkis, J., &Xue, B. (2017). Towards a national circular economy indicator system in China: Evaluation and gaps. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(4), 105–116.
- Hwang, B. G., & Tan, J. S. (2012). Green building project management in developing economies. International Journal of Project Management, 30(7), 873–882.
- Hwang, B. G., & Leong, C. (2013). Delay risks in green building projects: Evidence from Africa. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(12), 1098–1108.
- Hwang, B. G., Zhao, X., & Tan, J. S. (2015). Green building adoption: Cost implications and risk management. International Journal of Construction Management, 15(2), 90–104.
- Jacobs, F. (2015). Sustainable construction awareness in Zambia: A stakeholder perspective. Zambia Journal of Construction, 12(1), 34–48.
- Karamoozian, H. (2025). Certification challenges in sustainable construction: Evidence from emerging markets. Sustainable Development Journal, 33(1), 112–128.
- Kibert, C. J. (2016). Sustainable construction: Green building design and delivery (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
- Kibwami, R., &Tutesigensi, A. (2016). Barriers to green construction adoption in Uganda. Sustainable Cities and Society, 27, 192–202.
- LEED. (2016). Green building rating system: Cost implications and benefits. U.S. Green Building Council.
- National Research Council. (2011). Cost and benefits of green buildings: Evidence-based analysis. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Oke, A., Aigbavboa, C., &Thwala, D. (2019). Green technology adoption in Zambia: Stakeholder perspectives. International Journal of Sustainable Construction, 4(1), 45–60.
- Opawole, A., Smallwood, J., &Simpeh, K. (2024). Emerging technologies in South African construction: Adoption challenges. Journal of Construction Innovation, 24(3), 178–195.
- Shafii, F., Ali, B., & Othman, A. (2006). Awareness and application of sustainable building technologies in developing countries. Building Research & Information, 34(3), 207–217.
- Simpeh, K., & Smallwood, J. (2018). Green building adoption in South Africa: Awareness and implementation challenges. Journal of Sustainable Construction, 3(2), 25–38.
- Simwero, D., Wanjiku, P., &Njoroge, R. (2024). Awareness and adoption of sustainable construction practices in Kenya. African Journal of Construction Management, 10(1), 55–69.
- UK Green Building Council. (2024). Barriers to adoption of sustainable building materials in the UK. London: UKGBC Publications.
- Wakhungu, J. (2021). Developers’ perceptions and green building adoption in Nairobi. Journal of Sustainable Urban Development, 8(2), 101–119.
- Windapo, A. O. (2014). Green building adoption in South Africa: Drivers and constraints. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 12(2), 167–183.
The study examined the effectiveness of green technology implementation in residential housing construction
projects, using Saloba Ltd in Kitwe District as a case study. It was guided by three objectives: current state of adoption,
effects of implementation, and determine challenges. A descriptive research design was employed, targeting employees and
stakeholders of Saloba Ltd. Stratified and simple random sampling techniques were applied to ensure fair representation,
with a sample size of 50 respondents. Data was collected through structured questionnaires and analyzed using STATA and
SPSS. Findings revealed a growing interest in sustainable housing solutions, with modular green housing designs (36%) and
affordable off-grid systems (30%) emerging as the most preferred, together accounting for 66% of future adoption trends.
However, adoption was constrained, as 36% of respondents viewed the trend as stable and 28% saw it as slowly increasing
due to limited awareness and training. Environmental concerns (40%) were identified as the strongest driver of adoption,
while material preferences leaned toward locally sourced timber (30%) and eco-friendly roofing materials (28%). Digital
tools such as mobile energy-monitoring apps (34%) and BIM (28%) were also highly regarded.
The effects of adoption were linked mainly to prestige (34%) and improved health/comfort (32%), while financial
savings (18%) and environmental conservation (16%) were secondary. Key challenges included performance uncertainties
(26%), limited materials (22%), high costs (14%), regulatory delays (32%), and weak enforcement (30%). In conclusion,
meaningful progress in green housing adoption requires stronger policies, better infrastructure, and collaboration among
government, policymakers, and construction companies.
Keywords :
Green Technology, Implementation, Housing, Construction, Projects and Challenges.