⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



Explainable Multi-View Machine Learning for Hantavirus Detection and Severity Classification Using Synthetic Data: A Computational Benchmark and Data-Integrity Assessment


Authors : Mohammad Yasir Mudasir; Zaeem Akbar Khan

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 9 - September


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/ykwen85t

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26sep765

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : This study presents an explainable multi-view machine-learning framework for hantavirus detection and diseaseseverity classification using structured synthetic clinical and laboratory data. A public benchmark comprising 10,000 entirely synthetic records was evaluated under clinical-only, laboratory-only, and decision-level fusion settings. A genetic algorithm (GA) was used for task- and classifier-specific feature selection, and six machine-learning classifiers were evaluated using a stratified 80:20 development–test protocol. Clinical and laboratory probabilities were integrated through 10,000 Monte Carlo weight samples evaluated using out-of-fold development predictions.

Keywords : Hantavirus Detection, Disease-Severity Classification, Synthetic Data, Machine Learning, Explainable Artificial Intelligence, Decision-Level Fusion, Data-Integrity Audit.

References :

  1. C. B. Jonsson, L. T. M. Figueiredo, and O. Vapalahti, “A global perspective on hantavirus ecology, epidemiology, and disease,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 412–441, 2010.
  2. M. Tariq and D.-M. Kim, “Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome: Literature review, epidemiology, clinical picture and pathogenesis,” Infection & Chemother-apy, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2022.
  3. P. A. Vial, M. Ferrés, C. Vial, J. Klingström, C. Ahlm, R. López, N. Le Corre, and G. J. Mertz, “Hantavirus in humans: A review of clinical aspects and manage-ment,” The Lancet Infectious Diseases, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. e371–e382, 2023.
  4. H. Du, P.-Z. Wang, J. Li, L. Bai, H. Li, H.-T. Yu, W. Jiang, Y. Zhang, J.-N. Wang, and X.-F. Bai, “Clinical characteristics and outcomes in critical patients with hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 14, p. 191, 2014.
  5. X. Fan, Z. Liu, S. Fu, J. Sang, H. Deng, F. Li, X. Zhang, N. Li, Q. Han, and Z. Liu, “Platelet distribution width at first day of hospital admission in patients with hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome caused by Hantaan virus may predict disease severity and critical patients’ survival,” Disease Markers, vol. 2018, p. 9701619, 2018.
  6. W.-j. Chen, H. Du, H.-f. Hu, J.-q. Lian, H. Jiang, J. Li, Y. Zhang, and P.-z. Wang, “Levels of peripheral blood routine, biochemical and coagulation parameters in pa-tients with hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome and their relationship with prognosis: An observational cohort study,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 24, p. 75, 2024.
  7. E. J. Topol, “High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence,” Nature Medicine, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 44–56, 2019.
  8. A. Rajkomar, J. Dean, and I. Kohane, “Machine learning in medicine,” New Eng-land Journal of Medicine, vol. 380, no. 14, pp. 1347–1358, 2019.
  9. Z. Yang, Q. Hu, Z. Feng, and Y. Sun, “Development and validation of a nomo-gram for predicting severity in patients with hemorrhagic fever with renal syn-drome: A retrospective study,” Open Medicine, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1582–1591, 2021.
  10. L. Huang, J. Wu, J. Luo, and W. Gu, “Predictors of severity in hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome,” International Journal of General Medicine, vol. 18, pp. 2033–2045, 2025.
  11. G. S. Collins, K. G. M. Moons, P. Dhiman, R. D. Riley, A. L. Beam,  et al., “TRIPOD+AI statement: Updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction mod-els that use regression or machine learning methods,”  BMJ, vol. 385, p. e078378, 2024.
  12. K. G. M. Moons, J. A. A. Damen, T. Kaul, L. Hooft, C. Andaur Navarro,  et al., “PROBAST+AI: An updated quality, risk of bias, and applicability assessment tool for prediction models using regression or artificial intelligence methods,” BMJ, vol. 388, p. e082505, 2025.
  13. S. M. Lundberg and S.-I. Lee, “A unified approach to interpreting model predic-tions,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30, pp. 4765–4774, Curran Associates, Inc., 2017.
  14. J. Brockmann, M. Kleines, N. Ghaffari Laleh, J. N. Kather, S. Wied, J. Floege, and G. S. Braun, “A simple clinical score to reduce unnecessary testing for Pu-umala hantavirus,” PLOS ONE, vol. 19, no. 6, p. e0304500, 2024.
  15. R. Li, J. Sun, Y. Chen, X. Fan, X. Wang, X. Zhang, K. Zhang, Q. Han, and Z. Liu, “Clinical and laboratory features and factors predicting disease severity in pediatric patients with hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome caused by Hantaan virus,” Journal of Medical Virology, vol. 95, no. 1, p. e28339, 2023.
  16. K. Ma, T. Wu, W. Guo, J. Wang, Q. Ming, and J. Zhu, “Clinical characteristics and a novel prediction nomogram (EASTAR) for patients with hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome: A multicenter retrospective study,” Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 51, 2025.
  17. A. Sehgal, S. Mehta, K. Sahay, E. Martynova, A. Rizvanov, M. Baranwal, and S. Chandy, “Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in asia: History, pathogene-sis, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention,” Viruses, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 561, 2023.
  18. H. Du, H. Hu, P. Wang, X. Wang, Y. Zhang, H. Jiang, J. Li, X. Bai, and J. Lian, “Predictive value of pentraxin-3 on disease severity and mortality risk in patients with hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 21, p. 445, 2021.
  19. M. Goeijenbier, R. A. Hartskeerl, J. Reimerink, J. Verner-Carlsson, J. F. Wage-naar, M. G. Goris, B. E. Martina, Å. Lundkvist, M. Koopmans, A. D. Osterhaus, E. C. van Gorp, and C. B. Reusken, “The hanta hunting study: Underdiagnosis of Puumala hantavirus infections in symptomatic non-travelling leptospirosis-suspected patients in the netherlands, in 2010 and april to november 2011,” Euro-surveillance, vol. 19, no. 32, p. 20878, 2014.
  20. H. Hujakka, V. Koistinen, I. Kuronen, P. Eerikainen, M. Parviainen, A. Lundkvist, A. Vaheri, A. Narvanen, and O. Vapalahti, “Diagnostic rapid tests for acute hantavirus infections: Specific tests for Hantaan, Dobrava and Puumala viruses versus a hantavirus combination test,”  Journal of Virological Methods, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 117–122, 2003.
  21. J. Schubert, F. Tollmann, and B. Weissbrich, “Evaluation of a pan-reactive hanta-virus enzyme immunoassay and of a hantavirus immunoblot for the diagnosis of nephropathia epidemica,” Journal of Clinical Virology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 63–74, 2001.
  22. Q. Liu, X. Liu, B. Jiang, and W. Yang, “Forecasting incidence of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in china using ARIMA model,” BMC Infectious Dis-eases, vol. 11, p. 218, 2011.
  23. G. Ye, M. Alim, P. Guan, D. Huang, B. Zhou, and W. Wu, “Improving the precision of modeling the incidence of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in mainland china with an ensemble machine learning approach,” PLOS ONE, vol. 16, no. 3, p. e0248597, 2021.
  24. C. X. Lv, S. Y. An, B. J. Qiao, and W. Wu, “Time series analysis of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in mainland china by using an XGBoost forecasting model,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 21, p. 839, 2021.
  25. K. She, C. Li, C. Qi, T. Liu, Y. Jia, Y. Zhu, L. Liu, Z. Wang, Y. Zhang, and X. Li, “Epidemiological characteristics and regional risk prediction of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in shandong province, china,”  International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, no. 16, p. 8495, 2021.
  26. O. Kazasidis and J. Jacob, “Machine learning identifies straightforward early warning rules for human Puumala hantavirus outbreaks,” Scientific Reports, vol. 13, p. 3585, 2023.
  27. Y. Tian, T. Wang, J.-J. Chen, Q. Xu, G.-L. Wang, B.-G. Jiang, L.-P. Wang, C.-L. Lv, T. Jiang, and L.-Q. Fang, “Distribution dynamics and urbanization-related fac-tors of Hantaan and Seoul virus infections in china between 2001 and 2020: A machine learning modelling analysis,”  Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 21, p. e39852, 2024.
  28. L. Breiman, “Random forests,” Machine Learning, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 5–32, 2001.
  29. T. Chen and C. Guestrin, “XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system,” in Pro-ceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 785–794, Association for Computing Machin-ery, 2016.
  30. T. A. Rahat, “Hantavirus detection dataset.” Kaggle, 2026. Accessed May 30, 2026.
  31. J. H. Holland, Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. Ann Arbor, MI, USA: University of Michigan Press, 1975.
  32. D. E. Goldberg, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Reading, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley, 1989.
  33. J. Yang and V. Honavar, “Feature subset selection using a genetic algorithm,” IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 44–49, 1998.
  34. D. W. Hosmer, S. Lemeshow, and R. X. Sturdivant, Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley & Sons, 3 ed., 2013.
  35. C. Cortes and V. Vapnik, “Support-vector networks,” Machine Learning, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 273–297, 1995.
  36. T. Cover and P. Hart, “Nearest neighbor pattern classification,” IEEE Transac-tions on Information Theory, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 21–27, 1967.
  37. J. R. Quinlan, “Induction of decision trees,” Machine Learning, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 81–106, 1986.
  38. J. Kittler, M. Hatef, R. P. W. Duin, and J. Matas, “On combining classifiers,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 226–239, 1998.
  39. L. I. Kuncheva, Combining Pattern Classifiers: Methods and Algorithms. Hobo-ken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
  40. N. Metropolis and S. Ulam, “The monte carlo method,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 44, no. 247, pp. 335–341, 1949.

This study presents an explainable multi-view machine-learning framework for hantavirus detection and diseaseseverity classification using structured synthetic clinical and laboratory data. A public benchmark comprising 10,000 entirely synthetic records was evaluated under clinical-only, laboratory-only, and decision-level fusion settings. A genetic algorithm (GA) was used for task- and classifier-specific feature selection, and six machine-learning classifiers were evaluated using a stratified 80:20 development–test protocol. Clinical and laboratory probabilities were integrated through 10,000 Monte Carlo weight samples evaluated using out-of-fold development predictions.

Keywords : Hantavirus Detection, Disease-Severity Classification, Synthetic Data, Machine Learning, Explainable Artificial Intelligence, Decision-Level Fusion, Data-Integrity Audit.

Paper Submission Last Date
31 - October - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe