Exploring Rural Electrification Possibilities in Southern Nigeria


Authors : Ekaba S. O.; Ekoko U. J.

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 2 - February


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/4b56uvdy

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/yv5kk6kp

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26feb769

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : In many rural areas of developing countries like Nigeria, the national electricity grid is still out of reach. For these communities, a hybrid power generation approach that mixes locally sourced renewable resources like solar energy with diesel generators is seen as a smart and eco-friendly solution. However, there’s a lack of detailed techno-economic studies on PV– diesel hybrid systems for off-grid electrification in Nigeria. This study aims to pinpoint the best system configurations for remote communities in Nigeria. To do this, we focused on three off-grid rural communities Azungwu, Agidiase, and Agidiehe situated in Ogwashi-Uku, Delta State, as our case studies. We looked at various system setups, including standalone options (solar-only, and diesel-only) as well as hybrid combinations. By utilizing meteorological data, community load profiles, diesel fuel prices, and component costs, we employed the HOMER software tool to find the most suitable system sizes across different scenarios, all while aiming to minimize the net present cost (NPC). We also evaluated the chosen configurations using other economic indicators like initial investment cost, total annual operating cost, and cost of energy (COE), along with generation shares and CO₂ emission levels. The results we've gathered show that, across all the agencies we looked into, the hybrid solar–diesel system stands out as the most reliable option. For this scenario, the best configuration yields a net present cost (NPC) of NGN 2,668,052. (cost of energy: 0.563 NGN/kWh) for Azungwu, NGN 2,739,955 (cost of energy: 0.443 NGN/kWh) for Agidiase, and NGN 214,156 (cost of energy: 0.737 NGN/kWh) for Agidiehe. Additionally, when we apply these optimal setups, we find that Azungwu and Agidiase achieve a renewable energy fraction of 88% of their total generation, while Agidiehe reaches an impressive 95%. In terms of CO2 emissions, the optimal system for Azungwu produces only 6% of what a diesel-only unit would emit, with Agidiase at 16% and Agidiehe at 13%. The configurations detailed in this paper can serve as a valuable guide for designing cost-effective renewable electrification systems for these communities and other villages with similar needs and environmental conditions.

References :

  1. Aaslid, P., Korpas, M.; Belsnes, M.M.; Fosso, O.B. (2022). Stochastic optimization of microgrid operation with renewable generation and energy storages. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 13, 1481–1491.
  2. Abd-Essalam, B., Ayat, Y. & Gassab, S. (2023). Energy management based on fuzzy controller of a PV/fuel cell/Li-ion battery/super capacitor for unpredictable high dynamic three-phase AC load. Academia http://doi.org/10.20998/2074-272X.
  3. Aeolos (2017). Wind turbine catalogue. www.windt urbinestar .com/ products.html. Last accessed 15 Nov 2017
  4. Ahmad, E. (2013). Performance of grid-connected hybrid photovoltaic/fuel cell/battery distributed generation system. International conference on Electrical Engineering and computer sciences (EECS 438). (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
  5. Alavi,S.M.Techno-Economic Pre-Feasibility Study of Wind and Solar Electricity Generating Systems for Household sin Central Finland. Master’s Thesis, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland,2014.
  6. Al-Odienat, A. I., & Al-Lawama, A. A. (2018). The Advantages of PID Fuzzy Controllers Over the Conventional Types. American Journal of Applied Science, V (6), 653 -658.
  7. Taniguchi, M.; Kaneko,S. Operational performance of the Bangladesh rural electrification program and its determinants with a focus on political interference. Energy Policy 2009,37,2433–2439. [CrossRef]
  8. Ajlan A, Tan CW, Abdilahi AM (2017) Assessment of environmental and economic perspectives for renewable-based hybrid power system in Yemen. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 75:559–570. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.024
  9. Ajuzia U.C, Azubogu H.C & Iyama C. (2020). An Energy Management System for Campus Hybrid Microgrid Using a Multifunction Intelligent Agent. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 11, Issue 1, January-2020 ISSN 2229-5518.
  10. Alsharif MH (2017) Optimization design and economic analysis of energy management strategy based on photovoltaic/energy storage for heterogeneous cellular networks using the HOMER model. Sol Energy 147:133–150
  11. Aminyavari M, Mamaghani AH, Shirazi A, Najafi B, Rinaldi F (2016). Exergetic, economic, and environmental evaluations and multi-objective optimization of an internal-reforming SOFC-gas turbine cycle coupled with a Rankine cycle. Appl Therm Eng 108:833–846
  12. Arceo A, Rosano M, Biswas WK (2018). Eco-efficiency analysis for remote area power supply selection in Western Australia. Clean Technology Environment Policy 20:463–475. https ://doi.org/10.1007/ s1009 8-017-1438-6
  13. Arribas L, Cano L, Cruz I, Mata M, Llobet E (2023) PV–wind hybrid system performance: a new approach and a case study. Renew Energy 35:128–137. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2009.07.002
  14. Asrari A, Ghasemi A, Javidi MH (2012). Economic evaluation of hybrid renewable energy systems for rural electrification in Iran: a case study. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:3123–3130. https ://doi. org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.052
  15. Astronergy (2017) Astronergy PV modules catalogue. www.astronergy .com/products_download.php.
  16. Bekele G, Boneya G (2012) Design of a photovoltaic–wind hybrid power generation system for ethiopian remote area. Energy Proc 14:1760–1765. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.12.1164
  17. Bekele G, Palm B (2010) Feasibility study for a standalone solar wind-based hybrid energy system for application in Ethiopia. Appl Energy 87:487–495. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.06.006
  18. Bentouba S, Bourouis M (2016) Feasibility study of a wind–photo voltaic hybrid power generation system for a remote area in the extreme south of Algeria. Appl Therm Eng 99:713–719. https :// doi.org/10.1016/j.applt herma leng.2015.12.014
  19. Brandoni C, Bošnjaković B (2017) HOMER analysis of the water and renewable energy nexus for water-stressed urban areas in Sub Saharan Africa. J Cleaner Prod 155(Part 1):105–118. https ://doi. org/10.1016/j.jclep ro.2016.07.114
  20. Dekker J, Nthontho M, Chowdhury S, Chowdhury SP (2022) Economic analysis of PV/diesel hybrid power systems in different climatic zones of South Africa. Int J Electric Power Energy System 40:104–112. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepe s.2012.02.010
  21. Diab F, Lan H, Ali S (2016) Novel comparison study between the hybrid renewable energy systems on land and on ship. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 63:452–463. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.053
  22. Dorji T, Urmee T, Jennings P (2022) Options for off-grid electrification in the Kingdom of Bhutan. Renew Energy 45:51–58. https ://doi. org/10.1016/j.renen e.2012.02.012
  23. Ekaba S.O, Ofualagba G., Uzedhe G.O (2025). SMA optimization of hybrid microgrid for energy efficiency.
  24. Fabio R, Farzad Moghaddampoor, Behzad Najafi, Renzo Marchesi (2020). "Economic feasibility analysis and optimization of hybrid renewable energy systems for rural electrification in Peru", Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy’
  25. Felik AN (2022) Optimisation and techno-economic analysis of autonomous photovoltaic–wind hybrid energy systems in comparison to single photovoltaic and wind systems. Energy Convers Manag 43:2453–2468. https ://doi.org/10.1016/S0196 -8904(01)00198 -4
  26. Flores HFV, Furubayashi T, Nakata T (2016) Decentralized electricity generation system based on local renewable energy sources in the Honduran rural residential sector. Clean Technol Environ Policy 18:883–900. https ://doi.org/10.1007/s1009 8-015-1067-x
  27. Dang J, Lu S, Luo Z, Wu C (2024) Optimal operation for integrated energy system considering thermal inertia of district heating network and buildings. Appl Energy 199:234–246. https ://doi. org/10.1016/j.apene rgy.2017.05.004
  28. Hafez O, Bhattacharya K (2022) Optimal planning and design of a renewable energy-based supply system for microgrids. Renew Energy 45:7–15. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.renen e.2012.01.087
  29. Homer Energy (2017a) HOMER Pro 3.10 user guide. www.homer energy.com/products/pro/docs/3.10/index .html. Last accessed 15 Nov 2017
  30. HOMER Energy (2017b) Generator minimum load ratio. www.homer energy.com/products/grid/docs/latest/generator_minimum_load_ ratio .html. Last accessed 20 Nov 2017
  31. Hoppecke-Batteries-GmbH (2017) Battery catalogue. www.hoppe cke.com/ de/product/power line-industriebatterien/. Last accessed 18 Nov 2017
  32. Hossain FM, Hasanuzzaman M, Rahim NA, Ping HW (2017) Impact of renewable energy on rural electrification in Malaysia: a review. Clean Technology Environment Policy 17:859–871. https ://doi. org/10.1007/s1009 8-014-0861-1
  33. Hossain M, Mekhilef S, Olatomiwa L (2017) Performance evaluation of a stand-alone PV–wind–diesel–battery hybrid system feasible for a large resort center in South China Sea, Malaysia. Sustain Cities Soc 28:358–366. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.10.008
  34. Irena (2014) Peru Renewable readiness assessment. www.irena .org/ publications/2014/Jun/Renewables -Readiness-Assessment -Peru. Last accessed 16 Oct 2017
  35. Kalantar M, Mousavi GSM (2020) Dynamic behavior of a stand-alone hybrid power generation system of wind turbine, micro-turbine, solar array and battery storage. Appl Energy 87:3051–3064. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.apene rgy.2010.02.019
  36. Kanase-Patil AB, Saini RP, Sharma MP (2010) Integrated renewable energy systems for off grid rural electrification of remote area. Renew Energy 35:1342–1349. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.renen e.2009.10.005
  37. Khan MJ, Iqbal MT (2005) Pre-feasibility study of stand-alone hybrid energy systems for applications in Newfoundland. Renew Energy 30:835–854. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.renen e.2004.09.001
  38. Khare V, Nema S, Baredar P (2016) Optimization of hydrogen-based hybrid renewable energy system using HOMER, BB-BC and GAMBIT. Int J Hydrog Energy 41:16743–16751. https ://doi. org/10.1016/j.ijhyd ene.2016.06.228
  39. Kojima M (2016) Fossil fuel subsidy and pricing policies recent developing country experience. World Bank. https ://doi. org/10.1596/1813-9450-7531
  40. Mamaghani AH, Najafi B, Casalegno A, Rinaldi F (2016b) Long term economic analysis and optimization of an HT-PEM fuel cell based micro combined heat and power plant. Appl Therm Eng 99:1201–1211
  41. Mamaghani AH, Najafi B, Casalegno A, Rinaldi F (2017) Predictive modelling and adaptive long-term performance optimization of an HT-PEM fuel cell based micro combined heat and power (CHP) plant. Appl Energy 192:519–529
  42. Marneni A, Kulkarni AD, Ananthapadmanabha T (2025) Loss reduction and voltage profile improvement in a rural distribution feeder using solar photovoltaic generation and rural distribution feeder optimization using HOMER. Proc Technol 21:507–513. https :// doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2015.10.036
  43. Morthorst PE (2017) Wind energy the fact, cost and prices, vol 2. NEI-DK–4555. 2004, European wind Energy association, Brussels, Belgium
  44. Najafi B, Mamaghani AH, Rinaldi F, Casalegno A (2015) Fuel partialization and power/heat shifting strategies applied to a 30 kW el high temperature PEM fuel cell based residential micro cogeneration plant. Int J Hydrog Energy 40:14224–14234
  45. Nusrat C, Chowdhury AH, Michela L and Wahiba Y (2020). Feasibility and Cost Analysis of Photovoltaic-Biomass Hy brid Energy System in Off-Grid Areas of Bangladesh. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1568
  46. Shaahid SM, Elhadidy MA (2022) Technical and economic assessment of grid-independent hybrid photovoltaic–diesel–battery power systems for commercial loads in desert environments. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 11:1794–1810. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j. rser.2006.03.001
  47. Shezan SA, Saidur R, Ullah KR, Hossain A, Chong WT, Julai S (2025) Feasibility analysis of a hybrid off-grid wind–DG–battery energy system for the eco-tourism remote areas. Clean Technology Environment Policy 17:2417–2430. https ://doi.org/10.1007/s1009 8-015-0983-0

In many rural areas of developing countries like Nigeria, the national electricity grid is still out of reach. For these communities, a hybrid power generation approach that mixes locally sourced renewable resources like solar energy with diesel generators is seen as a smart and eco-friendly solution. However, there’s a lack of detailed techno-economic studies on PV– diesel hybrid systems for off-grid electrification in Nigeria. This study aims to pinpoint the best system configurations for remote communities in Nigeria. To do this, we focused on three off-grid rural communities Azungwu, Agidiase, and Agidiehe situated in Ogwashi-Uku, Delta State, as our case studies. We looked at various system setups, including standalone options (solar-only, and diesel-only) as well as hybrid combinations. By utilizing meteorological data, community load profiles, diesel fuel prices, and component costs, we employed the HOMER software tool to find the most suitable system sizes across different scenarios, all while aiming to minimize the net present cost (NPC). We also evaluated the chosen configurations using other economic indicators like initial investment cost, total annual operating cost, and cost of energy (COE), along with generation shares and CO₂ emission levels. The results we've gathered show that, across all the agencies we looked into, the hybrid solar–diesel system stands out as the most reliable option. For this scenario, the best configuration yields a net present cost (NPC) of NGN 2,668,052. (cost of energy: 0.563 NGN/kWh) for Azungwu, NGN 2,739,955 (cost of energy: 0.443 NGN/kWh) for Agidiase, and NGN 214,156 (cost of energy: 0.737 NGN/kWh) for Agidiehe. Additionally, when we apply these optimal setups, we find that Azungwu and Agidiase achieve a renewable energy fraction of 88% of their total generation, while Agidiehe reaches an impressive 95%. In terms of CO2 emissions, the optimal system for Azungwu produces only 6% of what a diesel-only unit would emit, with Agidiase at 16% and Agidiehe at 13%. The configurations detailed in this paper can serve as a valuable guide for designing cost-effective renewable electrification systems for these communities and other villages with similar needs and environmental conditions.

Paper Submission Last Date
31 - March - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe