Authors :
Lam Ky Nhan
Volume/Issue :
Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 9 - September
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/yc2csddk
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/3sx5rfs6
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24SEP1094
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
This study investigates the perceptions of EFL
students regarding the role of peer interaction in
developing English-speaking skills. A total of 125 English
majors from Nam Can Tho University participated in the
study, providing insights through a questionnaire on how
peer-based activities influence their language learning.
The results indicate that peer interaction offers increased
opportunities for language practice, reduces anxiety, and
boosts confidence in using English. Students reported that
structured tasks, such as role-plays and problem-solving
activities, significantly enhance their engagement,
language fluency, and accuracy. Additionally, tasks
relevant to real-life situations were found to motivate
students to participate more actively in peer-based
learning. These findings align with previous research,
emphasizing the positive impact of peer interaction on
fluency, vocabulary use, and self-monitoring. The study
concludes that integrating peer interaction into EFL
curricula fosters a supportive and communicative
learning environment, encouraging collaborative
language use and contributing to the overall development
of English-speaking proficiency.
Keywords :
Peer Interaction, English-Speaking Skills, EFL Learners, Collaborative Learning, Language Fluency.
References :
- British Council. (2020). English in a changing world. British Council.
- Bygate, M. (2020). Speaking (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Canagarajah, A. S. (2020). Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. Routledge.
- Crystal, D. (2019). English as a global language (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
- Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2020). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 6(2), 243-261.
- Dobao, A. F., & Blum, A. (2019). Lexical and grammatical development in peer interaction. Language Learning, 69(1), 83-105.
- Dobao, A. F., & Blum, A. (2019). Peer interaction and language learning. Language Learning Journal, 47(2), 163-181.
- Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2020). The psychology of the language learner revisited. Routledge.
- Ellis, R. (2020). Understanding second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Gánem-Gutiérrez, G. A. (2020). Sociocultural theory and peer scaffolding in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 24(5), 601-616.
- Gánem-Gutiérrez, G. A., & Harun, H. (2020). Scaffolding peer interaction: Sociocultural perspectives on collaborative learning. Language Teaching Research, 24(4), 486-504.
- Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2021). Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. Routledge.
- Graddol, D. (2021). The future of English? British Council.
- Gutiérrez, K. D. (2022). Vygotskian approaches to teaching and learning: Scaffolding and the zone of proximal development. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 11(2), 120-135.
- Gutiérrez, K. D. (2022). Vygotskian perspectives on collaborative learning in language education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(1), 103-117.
- Horwitz, E. K. (2021). Language anxiety: From theory and research to classroom implications (2nd ed.). Pearson.
- Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. A. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125-132.
- Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2022). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
- Kirkpatrick, A. (2022). World Englishes: Implications for international communication and English language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
- Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman.
- Lantolf, J. P. (2020). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford University Press.
- Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2021). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford University Press.
- Loewen, S. (2022). Introduction to instructed second language acquisition. Routledge.
- Long, M. H. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 126-141.
- Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). Academic Press.
- Long, M. H. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Wiley.
- Long, M. H. (2021). Interaction and second language acquisition: A discussion of the interaction hypothesis. Second Language Research, 37(4), 1-23.
- MacIntyre, P. D. (2022). Affective factors and willingness to communicate in second language learning. Language Teaching, 55(3), 381-396.
- MacIntyre, P. D. (2022). Willingness to communicate in the second language: Understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process. The Modern Language Journal, 106(3), 544-557.
- Mackey, A. (2020). Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies. Oxford University Press.
- Mackey, A. (2020). Peer interaction and language learning: Evidence from second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 40, 43-58.
- Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2021). Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. Routledge.
- Newton, J. (2013). Incidental vocabulary learning in classroom communication tasks. Language Teaching Research, 17(2), 164-186.
- Nguyen, T. T., & Pham, M. H. (2020). Implementing communicative language teaching in Vietnam. EFL Journal, 7(4), 221-234.
- Ohta, A. S. (2021). Sociocultural theory and the role of peer interaction in language learning. Language Teaching Research, 25(3), 267-285.
- Ohta, A. S. (2021). Sociocultural theory and the zone of proximal development. Cambridge University Press.
- Philp, J., & Tognini, R. (2021). Language learning through role-play and simulation: Research findings and practical applications. Journal of Language Teaching, 52(3), 214-231.
- Philp, J., Adams, R., & Iwashita, N. (2021). Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda. Routledge.
- Philp, J., Adams, R., & Iwashita, N. (2021). Peer interaction and oral fluency in L2 learning. Journal of Second Language Studies, 8(2), 223-246.
- Philp, J., Adams, R., & Iwashita, N. (2021). Peer interaction in L2 learning: Opportunities for speaking development. Second Language Studies, 31(3), 235-252.
- Pica, T. (2021). Classroom interaction: Negotiation of meaning and feedback. Routledge.
- Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (2020). Task-based interaction and second language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 40, 211-227.
- Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (2020). Task-based peer interaction and speaking fluency. Language Teaching Research, 24(2), 233-256.
- Richards, J. C. (2020). Teaching listening and speaking: From theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.
- Robinson, P. (2021). Task complexity and interaction in second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(2), 215-239.
- Sato, M. (2017). Interaction and peer feedback in language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 51(3), 553-584.
- Sato, M., & Ballinger, S. (2020). Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda. John Benjamins.
- Sato, M., & Lyster, R. (2020). Peer interaction and feedback in ESL contexts. Applied Linguistics, 41(4), 568-590.
- Sato, M., & Lyster, R. (2020). Peer interaction and oral production in ESL classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 54(4), 860-881.
- Sato, M., & Viveros, P. (2021). Peer interaction in the language classroom: Benefits for language proficiency and learner affect. System, 97, 102433.
- Seidlhofer, B. (2021). Understanding English as a lingua franca. Oxford University Press.
- Skehan, P. (2021). Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Language Teaching, 54(3), 261-281.
- Sundqvist, P., & Sylvén, L. K. (2022). Extramural English matters: Out-of-school English and its impact on oral proficiency. System, 105, 102749.
- Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Newbury House.
- Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 125-144). Oxford University Press.
- Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford University Press.
- Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471-484). Routledge.
- Swain, M. (2021). The output hypothesis and second language learning. Oxford University Press.
- Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2020). Collaborative dialogue and second language learning: Scaffolding in peer interaction. Language Teaching Research, 24(2), 233-253.
- Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2020). Task-based learning and peer collaboration: Enhancing language output. Language Teaching Research, 24(5), 635-655.
- Swain, M., & Watanabe, Y. (2021). Collaborative dialogue, output, and language learning. Language Awareness, 30(2), 123-136.
- Thornbury, S. (2019). How to teach speaking. Pearson Education.
- Tsui, A. B. M. (1996). Reticence and anxiety in second language learning. Cambridge University Press.
- Ushioda, E. (2020). Motivation and foreign language learning: Bridging the gap between theory and practice. Language Teaching, 53(4), 425-437.
- Zhang, Y. (2021). Enhancing language production through peer interaction. Language Teaching Research, 25(5), 567-590.
- Zhang, Y. (2022). Challenges in speaking proficiency development: A case study of EFL learners. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 50, 100964.
This study investigates the perceptions of EFL
students regarding the role of peer interaction in
developing English-speaking skills. A total of 125 English
majors from Nam Can Tho University participated in the
study, providing insights through a questionnaire on how
peer-based activities influence their language learning.
The results indicate that peer interaction offers increased
opportunities for language practice, reduces anxiety, and
boosts confidence in using English. Students reported that
structured tasks, such as role-plays and problem-solving
activities, significantly enhance their engagement,
language fluency, and accuracy. Additionally, tasks
relevant to real-life situations were found to motivate
students to participate more actively in peer-based
learning. These findings align with previous research,
emphasizing the positive impact of peer interaction on
fluency, vocabulary use, and self-monitoring. The study
concludes that integrating peer interaction into EFL
curricula fosters a supportive and communicative
learning environment, encouraging collaborative
language use and contributing to the overall development
of English-speaking proficiency.
Keywords :
Peer Interaction, English-Speaking Skills, EFL Learners, Collaborative Learning, Language Fluency.