Authors : Madhiha

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 12 - December

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/57j352xa

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/mwd6d5w5

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25dec1274

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : The deep sea—dark, vast, and still largely unknown—has become the latest frontier in humanity’s search for resources. As demand for critical metals such as cobalt, nickel, and rare earth elements grows, industries are turning toward the ocean floor thousands of meters below the surface. Deep-sea mining (DSM) offers the promise of supporting renewable energy and green technologies, but it also raises urgent ecological and ethical concerns. This paper investigates DSM, its methods, its ecological risks, and the debates surrounding its future. Evidence shows that mining threatens fragile ecosystems that took millions of years to form. Recovery from mining scars can take centuries— or may never fully occur. The conclusion argues for precaution, stronger governance, and investment in alternatives such as recycling and circular economies.

References :

1. Drazen, J.C., & Smith, C.R. (2020). Midwater ecosystems must be considered in deep-sea mining plans. PNAS, 117(30).
2. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). (2022). Issues Brief: Deep-Sea Mining. IUCN World Conservation Congress. (2021). Resolution 122 on Deep-Sea Mining.
3. Levin, L. A., et al. (2020). Deep-Sea Mining and the Marine Environment. Marine Policy, 114.
4. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). (2023). Understanding Deep-Sea Ecosystems.
5. Reuters. (2025). Deep-sea mining impacts still felt 40 years on, study shows.
6. United Nations. (1982). United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).