Authors : Burnwell Mulenga; Tizta Degfie

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 4 - April

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/5xvfn4mh

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/nh9vn23x

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25apr1952

Google Scholar

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 15 to 20 days to display the article.

Abstract : Background: An essential prerequisite for women's development is better maternal and reproductive health. Since 1991, Zambian governments have made tackling the nation's healthcare issues a top priority. Among the initiatives they have implemented, the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) has been at the top of the list. The National Health Insurance Act No. 2 of 2018 resulted in the creation of the Scheme, which is overseen by the National Health Insurance Management Authority (NHIMA). This study intends to explore the perceptions and experiences of policyholders regarding the effectiveness and challenges surrounding the NHIS in improving maternal and reproductive health services in Zambia.  Methods: The study employed a phenomenological design using thematic analysis to explore the perceptions and experiences of policyholders regarding the effectiveness and challenges of NHIS in improving maternal and reproductive health services in Zambia. A purposive sample of 69 policyholders was selected for in-depth interviews. Data collection proceeded until saturation was reached, and all interviews were recorded, transcribed, and systematically coded. Thematic analysis was conducted to appreciate perceptions and challenges. Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained to ensure confidentiality and voluntary participation  Results: Thematic analysis revealed insights into the experiences and perceptions of NHIS policyholders. A significant number of policyholders reported positive experiences regarding increased access to maternal and reproductive health services since the implementation of the NHIS. The insurance scheme has made significant strides in reducing financial barriers, thus enabling more women to seek necessary medical care. However, despite the positive perceptions, the study identified several challenges that hinder the full potential of the NHIS. Key issues included limited coverage, particularly for rural populations, inadequate medical facilities, and a shortage of essential drugs and trained healthcare personnel. Such systemic problems have led to discrepancies in service delivery. While the NHIS has improved access, concerns regarding the quality of care persist. Some beneficiaries reported dissatisfaction with the services received, citing long wait times, lack of essential medical supplies, and inadequate infrastructure in health facilities. The quality of care directly impacts maternal and reproductive health outcomes, highlighting the need for ongoing investments in healthcare infrastructure and workforce training.  Limitations: A meta-analysis was not feasible due to the qualitative nature of the study, which limited the capacity to quantitatively synthesize the results.  Conclusions: As Zambia continues to work toward its health objectives, findings suggest that there are positive trends in enhancing access to these essential services. Increasing utilization of maternal health care facilities and improved health outcomes for mothers and newborns have been observed in some regions. However, despite these promising indications, numerous challenges persist that hinder the full realization of equitable and effective care for all women. By addressing these challenges, the NHIS can strengthen its impact and contribute to better health outcomes for mothers and their children in Zambia.

Keywords : Scheme, Maternal and Reproductive Health, Access, Utilisation, Perceptions, Experiences, Policyholder.

References :

1. Joseph Kazibwe et al, The impact of health insurance on maternal and reproductive health service utilization and financial protection in low- and lower middle-income countries: a systematic review of the evidence, BMC Health Serv Res 2024 Apr 5;24(1):432.doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10815-5.
2. National Health Insurance Management Authority.NHIMA
3. Mussa EC, Palermo T, Angeles G, et al. Impact of community-based health insurance on health services utilization among vulnerable households in Amhara region, Risk Management and Healthcare Policy 2020:13 1879–1904
4. Ministry of Health, Zambia; ministerial statement on the national health insurance scheme moh.gov.zm
5. Motsepe A, Radiography B, Radiography P, Wolvaardt JE, Webb EM. Rapid assessment of two primary health clinics: are we ready for National Health Insurance? South Afr J Public Health Incorp Strength Health Syst. 2020;4(1):22–26. doi:10.7196/SHS.2020.v4.i1.109
6. Duku SKO, Nketiah-amponsah E, Janssens W, et al. Perceptions of healthcare quality in Ghana: does health insurance status matter? PLoS One. 2018;13:1–18. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190911
7. Sithole HL. An overview of the National Health Insurance and its  possible impact on eye healthcare services in South Africa.  African Vis Eye Health. 2015;74:1–6.
8. Booysen F, Hongoro C. Perceptions of and support for national health insurance in South Africa’s public and private healthcare sectors. Pan Afr Med J. 2018;8688:1–9.
9. Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:69. doi:10.1186/1748- 5908-5-69
10. Christmals CD, Armstrong SJ. The essence, opportunities and threats to advanced practice nursing in Sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review. Heliyon. 2019;5(10):e02531. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02531
11. Mendeley. Free Reference Manager & Citation Generator - Mendeley. Elsevier; 2018:1.
12. Christmals CD, Gross J, Aziato L, Armstrong SJ. The state of nursing research in Ghana: an integrative literature review. SAGE Open Nurs. 2018;4:237796081878382. doi:10.1177/2377960818 783820
13. Sandelowski M, Voils CI, Leeman J, Crandell JL. Mapping the mixed methods – mixed research synthesis Terrain. J Mix Methods Res. 2012;6:317–331. doi:10.1177/1558689811427913
14. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277–1288. doi:10.1177/ 1049732305276687
15. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann
16. Intern Med. 2018;169:467. doi:10.7326/M18-0850
17. Abiiro GA, McIntyre D. Universal financial protection through National Health Insurance: a stakeholder analysis of the proposed  one-time premium payment policy in Ghana. Health Policy Plan. 2013;28:263–278. doi:10.1093/heapol/czs059
18. Aryeetey GC, Jehu-Appiah C, Kotoh AM, et al. Community concepts of poverty: an application to premium exemptions in Ghana’s National Health Insurance Scheme. Global Health. 2013;9:1–11. doi:10.1186/1744-8603-9-12
19. Agyei-Baffour P, Oppong R, Boateng D. Knowledge, perceptions and expectations of capitation payment system in a health insurance setting: a repeated survey of clients and health providers in Kumasi, Ghana. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:1–9. doi:10.1186/ 1471-2458-13-1220
20. Ashigbie PG, Azameti D, Wirtz VJ. Challenges of medicines management in the public and private sector under Ghana’s National Health Insurance Scheme - a qualitative study. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2016;9:1–10. doi:10.1186/s40545-016- 0055-9
21. Barimah KB, Mensah J. Ghana’s national health insurance scheme: insights from members, administrators and health care providers. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2013;24:1378–1390. doi:10.1353/hpu.2013.0144
22. Dalaba MA, Aborigo R, Akweongo P, et al. Does the National Health Insurance Scheme in Ghana reduce household cost of treating malaria in the Kassena-Nankana districts? Glob Health Action. 2014;7:7. doi:10.3402/gha.v7.23848
23. Fosu R, Opoku-asante K, Adu-Gyamfi K. Influence of community financing health insurance schemes on in-patient care in Ghana: the case of Nkoranza scheme. Dev Country Stud. 2014;4:53–64.
24. Hampshire KR, Porter G, Asiedu S, Tanle A, Abane A. Social science & medicine out of the reach of children? Young people ’ s health-seeking practices and agency in Africa’ s newly-emerging therapeutic landscapes. Soc Sci Med. 2011;73:702–710. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.035
25. Frimpong JA, Helleringer S, Awoonor-Williams JK, Aguilar T,  Phillips JF, Yeji F. The complex association of health insurance  and maternal health services in the context of a premium exemption for pregnant women: A case study in Northern Ghana. Health  Policy Plan. 2014;29:1043–1053. doi:10.1093/heapol/czt086
26. Asundep NN, Carson AP, Archer C, et al. Determinants of access to antenatal care and birth outcomes in Kumasi, Ghana. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2013;3(4):279–288.
27. Dalinjong PA, Welaga P, Akazili J, et al. The association between health insurance status and utilization of health services in rural Northern Ghana: evidence from the introduction of the National Health Insurance Scheme. J Health Popul Nutr. 2017;36:1–11.
28. Fenny AP, Enemark U, Asante FA, Hansen KS. Patient satisfaction with primary health care – a comparison between the insured and non-insured under the national health insurance policy in Ghana. Glob J Health Sci. 2014;6:9–21. doi:10.5539/gjhs.v6n4p9
29. Osei Asibey B, Agyemang S. Analysing the influence of health insurance status on peoples’ health seeking behaviour in Rural Ghana. J Trop Med. 2017;2017:7. doi:10.1155/2017/8486451
30. Adei D, Kwadwo VO, Diko SK. An assessment of the Kwabre district mutual health insurance scheme in Ghana. Curr Res J Soc Sci. 2012;4:372–382.
31. Boateng D, Awunyor-Vitor D. Health insurance in Ghana: evaluation of policy holders’ perceptions and factors influencing policy renewal in the Volta region. Int J Equity Health. 2013;12:1. doi:10.1186/1475-9276-12-50
32. Boateng S, Amoako P, Poku AA, Baabereyir A, Gyasi RM. Migrant female head porters ’ enrolment in and utilisation and renewal of the National Health Insurance Scheme in Kumasi,Ghana. J Public Health (Bangkok). 2017;25:625–634. doi:10. 1007/s10389-017-0832-1
33. Akazili J, Ataguba JEO, Kanmiki EW, et al. Assessing the impoverishment effects of out-of-pocket healthcare payments prior to the uptake of the national health insurance scheme in Ghana. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2017;17:1–9. doi:10.1186/s12914-017-0121-7
34. Addae-Korankye A. Challenges of financing health care in Ghana: the case of National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS). Int J Asian Soc Sci. 2013;3:511–522.
35. Dalinjong PA, Wang AY, Homer CSE. Has the free maternal health policy eliminated out of pocket payments for maternal health services? Views of women, health providers and insurance managers in Northern Ghana. PLoS One. 2018;13:1–20. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0184830
36. Mensah J, Oppong JR, Schmidt CM. Ghana’s National Health Insurance Scheme in the context of the health MDGs: an empirical evaluation using propensity score matching. Health Econ. 2010;19:95–106. doi:10.1002/hec.1633
37. Jehu-Appiah C, Aryeetey G, Spaan E, et al. Equity aspects of the National Health Insurance Scheme in Ghana: who is enrolling, who is not and why? Soc Sci Med. 2011;72:157–165. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.10.025
38. Aryeetey GC, Nonvignon J, Amissah C, Buckle G, Aikins M. Migrating from user fees to social health insurance: exploring the prospects and challenges for hospital management. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;12:1–9.
39. Sodzi-Tettey S, Aikins M, Awoonor-Williams J, Agyepong IA. Challenges in provider payment under the Ghana Na- Tional health insurance scheme: a case study of claims. Ghana Med J. 2012;46:189–200.
40. . Witter S, Garshong B. Something old or something new? Social health insurance in Ghana. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2009;9:1–13. doi:10.1186/1472-698X-9-20
41. Nsiah-boateng E, Aikins M. Performance assessment of ga district mutual health insurance scheme, greater accra region, Ghana. Value Health Reg Issues. 2013;2:300–305. doi:10.1016/j.vhri.20 13.06.005