Exploring the Impact of 6-Hour Instructional Engagement Policy on Teachers’ Wellbeing


Authors : Mariel Joy G. Calubiran; Danilo E. Despi

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 1 - January


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/4n6suyyj

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/yxu4tc4u

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jan666

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : This study examines the impact of the six-hour instructional engagement policy on the well-being of public-school teachers in the Philippines. Using a qualitative approach, the research explores how the directive influences instructional practices, workload management, and work-life balance. Data were collected from teachers in schools with varying levels of policy compliance. Findings indicate that structured implementation supported by administrative mechanisms enhances instructional focus, accountability, and emotional well-being. Teachers reported improved time management and professional satisfaction when expectations were clear and non-teaching duties were minimized. However, persistent challenges such as administrative overload, rigid scheduling, and inadequate resources compromise policy effectiveness and teacher autonomy. While the directive generally promotes a healthier balance between professional and personal responsibilities, its success depends on consistent enforcement, manageable workloads, and institutional support. Recommendations include flexible scheduling, streamlined documentation, wellness programs, and harmonized guidelines to ensure equitable implementation. The study contributes to educational policy discourse by highlighting the interplay between workload structures and teacher welfare outcomes, offering actionable insights for improving instructional quality and retention in the Philippine public school system.

Keywords : Teacher Well-Being, Instructional Engagement Policy, Workload Management, Educational Policy, Public School Teachers.

References :

  1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). Academic Press.
  2. Alvarez, L. M. (2023). Workload boundaries: Addressing work-life imbalance among public school teachers. Philippine Journal of Education and Psychology, 14(1), 67–80.
  3. Angrist, N., & Dercon, S. (2024). Understanding gaps between education policy and practice. What Works Hub for Global Education. https://www.wwhge.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/UnderstandingGapsbetweenEducationPolicyandPractice_final.pdf
  4. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285.
  5. Bautista, R. (2020). Teachers’ unpaid labor and their effects on morale. Journal of Filipino Educators, 8(2), 34–45.
  6. Beames, J. R., Spanos, S., Roberts, A., McGillivray, L., Li, S., Newby, J. M., O'Dea, B., & Werner-Seidler, A. (2023). Intervention programs targeting the mental health, professional burnout, and/or well-being of school teachers: Systematic review and meta-analyses. Educational Psychology Review, 35(1), Article 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09720-w
  7. Bennell, P. (2018). Teacher motivation and incentives in low-income countries. Educational Research Review, 15(1), 15–25.
  8. Caballero, M. C. (2019). Lived experiences of teachers under the 6-hour directive. Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 9(3), 45–59.
  9. Cammayo, P. M. T., Aquino, C. S., & Gomez, M. G. A. (2023). Factors predicting stress and burnout of Filipino teachers engaged in remote learning. Philippine Journal of Labor and Industrial Relations.
  10. Cervellione, B., Lombardo, E. M. C., & Iacolino, C. (2025). Psychological resources and interventions for teachers’ emotional competence and well-being: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article 1640968. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1640968
  11. Creagh, S., Thompson, G., Mockler, N., Stacey, M., & Hogan, A. (2023). Workload, work intensification and time poverty for teachers and school leaders: A systematic research synthesis. Educational Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2023.2196607
  12. Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2019). Teacher resilience: Managing stress and burnout in demanding contexts. Cambridge Journal of Education, 49(2), 127–140.
  13. David, P. (2019). Administrative burdens and their effect on teachers’ wellbeing. Philippine Educational Review, 71(2), 13–28.
  14. De Jesus, F. (2023). Coping strategies among public elementary teachers. Sorsogon Research Journal, 5(1), 50–62.
  15. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
  16. Dela Cruz, J. B., & Paglinawan, J. L. (2024). Emotional exhaustion and school environment on the work ethics of rural teachers. International Journal of Scientific and Management Research.
  17. Dicke, T., Marsh, H. W., Parker, P. D., Guo, J., Riley, P., & Waldeyer, J. (2020). Job satisfaction of teachers and their principals in relation to climate and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(5), 1061–1073. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000409
  18. Education International. (2017). Workload and working conditions of teachers. https://www.ei-ie.org
  19. Fatahi, N., & Warner-Griffin, C. (2024). Approaches to teacher well-being. U.S. Department of Education. https://www.ed.gov/media/document/eirteacher-wellbeing508-107807.pdf
  20. Garcia, J. (2016). Stress-related absenteeism in DepEd schools. Philippine Journal of Health and Education, 3(2), 70–82.
  21. Gavin, M., & McGrath-Champ, S. (2024). Teacher workload and the organisation of work: A research agenda for a post-pandemic future. Labour and Industry: A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work, 34(1), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/10301763.2024.2357891
  22. Gonzales, L. (2021). Emotional strain of teachers under rigid workload policies. Education Outlook Philippines, 10(4), 55–67.
  23. Grefaldo, L. H., Jr., & Bausa, M. E. (2025). Attendance monitoring and records management system for Pilar National Comprehensive High School using face recognition. Global Scientific Journal, 13(2).
  24. Hargreaves, A. (2019). The emotional practice of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102872.https://www.globalscientificjournal.com/researchpaper/ATTENDANCEMONITORINGANDRECORDSMANAGEMENTSYSTEMFORPILARNATIONALCOMPREHENSIVEHIGHSCHOOLUSINGFACERECOGNITION.pdf
  25. Hennessey, A., MacQuarrie, S., Pert, K., Bagnall, C., & Squires, G. (2023). Embedding a whole school culture for supporting teacher and pupil wellbeing: A Well Schools case study example. The Psychology of Education Review, 47(2), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsper.2023.47.2.22
  26. Herman, K. C., & Reddy, L. A. (2024). School personnel well-being: Advancing measurement, best practices, and policy—Section 1: The role of context and competence in educator well-being. School Psychology, 39(3), 237–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000640
  27. Hornstra, L., Mansfield, C., van der Veen, I., Peetsma, T., & Volman, M. (2015). Motivational teacher strategies: The role of beliefs and contextual factors. Learning Environments Research, 18(3), 363–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-015-9189-y
  28. Hulme, M., Beauchamp, G., Wood, J., & Bignell, C. (2024). Workload intensification and well-being among primary school teachers in Scotland. Education 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2024.2448509
  29. Ilies, R., Huth, M., Ryan, A. M., & Dimotakis, N. (2015). Explaining the links between workload, distress, and work–family conflict among school employees: Physical, cognitive, and emotional fatigue. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(4), 1136–1149. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000029
  30. Ingersoll, R., & Collins, G. (2018). Autonomy and teacher satisfaction: A multilevel analysis. Teachers College Record, 120(5), 1–32.
  31. Kim, K.-N. (2019). Teachers’ administrative workload crowding out instructional activities. Asia Pacific Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2019.1572592
  32. Klusmann, U., et al. (2016). Teachers’ stress and classroom management. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(8), 1189–1204.
  33. LeBlanc, R. (2020). Class size: Overcoming the effects on teachers and students. ERIC Journal. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1350816.pdf
  34. Leithwood, K., et al. (2020). Linking principal leadership and teacher stress. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(1), 32–65.
  35. Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2016). Understanding the burnout experience: Recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry, 15(2), 103–111.
  36. McIntyre, T., et al. (2018). Gender and educator burnout. Journal of School Psychology, 67, 55–68.
  37. McNeil, M. P. (2017). Time management: Finding balance to do it “all”. In D. S. Anderson (Ed.), Further wellness issues for higher education: How to promote student health during and after college (pp. 85–100). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2017-16109-005
  38. Mercer, V. (2025). A policy void: An analysis of biometric facial recognition technology governance in K–12 public school handbooks. Issues in Information Systems, 26(3), 445–456. https://iacis.org/iis/2025/3iis2025_445-456.pdf
  39. Moodley, J., & Singh, P. (2021). Teaching under pressure: A study of teacher burnout in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 41(1), 1–10.
  40. Nalipay, M. J. N., Chai, C. S., Jong, M. S.-Y., & Bajal, M. G. (2025). Teachers’ experiences of handling students with mental health issues: Implications for school mental health programs. School Mental Health, 17(1), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-024-09720-3
  41. OECD. (2020). TALIS 2018 Results (Volume II): Teachers and School Leaders as Valued Professionals. OECD Publishing.
  42. OECD. (2024). Curriculum flexibility and autonomy: Promoting a thriving learning environment. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/curriculum-flexibility-and-autonomy_eccbbac2-en.html
  43. Pak, K., Polikoff, M. S., Desimone, L. M., & García, E. S. (2020). The adaptive challenges of curriculum implementation: Insights for educational leaders driving standards-based reform. AERA Open, 6(2), 1–15. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1258084.pdf
  44. Patzak, A., & Zhang, X. (2025). Blending teacher autonomy support and provision of structure in the classroom for optimal motivation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 37(1), Article 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-09994-2
  45. Patzak, A., Zhang, X., & Vytasek, J. (2025). Boosting productivity and wellbeing through time management: Evidence-based strategies for higher education and workforce development. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1623228. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1623228
  46. Reyes, A. (2021). Policy implementation gaps and teacher dissatisfaction. Philippine Review of Public Policy, 23(1), 89–102.
  47. Sahlberg, P. (2020). Trust-based education reform in Finland. Educational Researcher, 49(5), 259–266.
  48. Salvador, N. (2017). Teaching policy stress in rural areas. Journal of Teacher Policy Studies, 6(1), 23–35.
  49. Santos, M. (2016). Public school teachers and stress in Metro Manila. Philippine Journal of Teacher Research, 2(1), 44–58.
  50. Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2017). Teacher stress and job satisfaction. Educational Psychology, 37(8), 1061–1076.
  51. Tarraya, H. O. (2022). Teachers’ workload policy: Its impact on Philippine public school teachers. Public Policy Analysis and Review, 5. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED629465.pdf
  52. Tipan, B. F. L., & Aguilar, P. A. (2025). Factors affecting teachers’ work-life balance and their work performance. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 40(5), 704–722. https://scimatic.org/storage/journals/11/pdfs/5572.pdf
  53. Torres, M. A., & Reyes, J. T. (2022). School support systems and teacher workload in Philippine public schools. Philippine Journal of Education and Policy, 14(1), 44–58. https://etcor.org/storage/iJOINED/Vol.%20IV%282%29,%201546-1557.pdf
  54. Torres, M. L. (2018). Low morale among public elementary school teachers. Basic Education Review, 5(3), 18–29.
  55. UNESCO. (2023). Instructional time and classroom management. https://learningportal.iiep.unesco.org/en/issue-briefs/improve-learning/instructional-time-and-classroom-management
  56. Viennet, R., & Pont, B. (2017). Education policy implementation: A literature review and proposed framework. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 162. https://one.oecd.org/document/EDU/WKP%282017%2911/En/pdf
  57. Villamayor, et al. (2025). Balancing act: Exploring the impact of ancillary duties on Filipino teachers’ professional lives. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science.
  58. Villanueva, E. (2022). Physical presence versus actual teaching hours: A school policy paradox. Education Monitor Philippines, 11(2), 77–91
  59. Witte, R. H. (2015). Mental health for educators. In R. H. Witte & G. S. Mosley-Howard (Eds.), Mental health practice in today's schools: Issues and interventions (pp. 193–212). Springer Publishing Company. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2014-56680-009
  60. Yap, C. M. (2022). Teaching in remote areas: A study on teacher equity. Philippine Rural Education Studies, 7(2), 101–114.
  61. Zeichner, K., & Hondo, J. (2020). Teacher voice in education reform. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(3), 292–304.
  62. Zhou, S., Slemp, G. R., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2024). Factors associated with teacher wellbeing: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 36(2), Article 63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09886-x

This study examines the impact of the six-hour instructional engagement policy on the well-being of public-school teachers in the Philippines. Using a qualitative approach, the research explores how the directive influences instructional practices, workload management, and work-life balance. Data were collected from teachers in schools with varying levels of policy compliance. Findings indicate that structured implementation supported by administrative mechanisms enhances instructional focus, accountability, and emotional well-being. Teachers reported improved time management and professional satisfaction when expectations were clear and non-teaching duties were minimized. However, persistent challenges such as administrative overload, rigid scheduling, and inadequate resources compromise policy effectiveness and teacher autonomy. While the directive generally promotes a healthier balance between professional and personal responsibilities, its success depends on consistent enforcement, manageable workloads, and institutional support. Recommendations include flexible scheduling, streamlined documentation, wellness programs, and harmonized guidelines to ensure equitable implementation. The study contributes to educational policy discourse by highlighting the interplay between workload structures and teacher welfare outcomes, offering actionable insights for improving instructional quality and retention in the Philippine public school system.

Keywords : Teacher Well-Being, Instructional Engagement Policy, Workload Management, Educational Policy, Public School Teachers.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe