Authors : Gitanjali Pawar; Jaydip Khose

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 4 - April

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/mc5cwsh9

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/49hmsztp

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24APR1939

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on education. Premised on a narrative and framework for assessing AI identified from a preliminary analysis, the scope of the study was limited to the application and effects of AI in administration, instruction, and learning. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative force in education, promising to revolutionize traditional teaching and learning methods. One critical aspect of this transformation is AI's potential to enhance equity and inclusion in educational settings. This paper explores the current state, challenges, and opportunities regarding AI's role in promoting equity and inclusion in education. The historical evolution of AI in education is examined, tracing its roots from early intelligent tutoring systems to contemporary adaptive learning platforms and virtual tutoring systems. Advances in machine learning, natural language processing, and data analytics have expanded AI's capabilities, enabling personalized learning experiences tailored to individual student needs. However, the widespread implementation of AI in education faces several challenges, including concerns about data privacy, algorithmic bias, and the digital divide. It is crucial to address these challenges through responsible and ethical AI deployment, ensuring that AI interventions prioritize equity, inclusivity, and transparency. Further research is needed to explore the effectiveness of AI interventions in different educational contexts and to develop strategies for mitigating potential risks and maximizing benefits. By leveraging AI technologies thoughtfully and ethically, educators and policymakers can work towards building a more equitable and inclusive education system that empowers all learners to reach their full potential.

Keywords : Education, Artificial Intelligence, Learning Qualitative Research

References :

1. K. Flamm, Creating the Computer: Government, Industry, and High Tech- nology. Washington, DC, USA: Brookings Institution Press, 1988.
2. M. Campbell-Kelly, Computer, Student Economy Edition: A History of the Information Machine. Evanston, IL, USA: Routledge, 2018.
3. M. M. L. Cairns ‘‘Computers in education: The impact on schools and classrooms,’’ in Life Schools Classrooms. Singapore: Springer, 2017, pp. 603–617.
4. B. Coppin, Artificial Intelligence Illuminated. Boston, MA, USA: Jones and Bartlett, 2004.
5. B. Whitby, Artificial Intelligence: A Beginner’s Guide. Oxford, U.K.: Oneworld, 2008.
6. V. Devedžic, ‘‘Web intelligence and artificial intelligence in education,’’ Educ. Technol. Soc., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 29–39, 2004.
7. M. J. Timms, ‘‘Letting artificial intelligence in education out of the box: Educational cobots and smart classrooms,’’ Int. J. Artif. Intell. Edu., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 701–712, Jan. 2016.
8. I. Roll and R. Wylie, ‘‘Evolution and revolution in artificial intelligence in education,’’ Int. J. Artif. Intell. Edu., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 582–599, Feb. 2016.
9. Surjandy, W. Suparta, A. Trisetyarso, C. H. Kang, and B. S. Abbas, ‘‘Ward- ing off the plagiarism with the applications (Case study at Bina Nusantara university student and faculty member),’’ in Proc. Int. Conf. Inf. Commun. Technol. (ICOIACT), Mar. 2018, pp. 511–514.
10. H. Sutton, ‘‘Minimize online cheating through proctoring, consequences,’’ Recruiting Retaining Adult Learners, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1–5, Jan. 2019.
11. D. Crowe, M. LaPierre, and M. Kebritchi, ‘‘Knowledge based artificial augmentation intelligence technology: Next step in academic instructional tools for distance learning,’’ TechTrends, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 494–506, Jul. 2017.
12. R.   F.   Murphy, ‘‘Artificial   intelligence   applications   to    support K–1 2 teachers and teaching,’’ RAND Corp., Santa Monica, CA, USA, Tech. Rep. PE135, 2019, doi: 10.7249/PE315.
13. S. Kiesler, R. E. Kraut, K. R. Koedinger, V. Aleven, and B. M. Mclaren, ‘‘Gamification in education: What, how, why bother,’’ Academic exchange quarterly, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1–5, 2011.
14. N. T. Le, S. Strickroth, S. Gross, and N. Pinkwart, ‘‘A review of AI- supported tutoring approaches for learning programming,’’ in Advanced Computational Methods for Knowledge Engineering. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 2013.
15. M. Saerbeck, T. Schut, C. Bartneck, and M. D. Janse, ‘‘Expressive robots in education: Varying the degree of social supportive behavior of a robotic tutor,’’ in Proc. 28th Int. Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. (CHI), 2010, pp. 1613–1622.