Authors :
Raden Kania; Ahmad Qurtubi; Asep Saefurohman
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 8 - August
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/5955s2w6
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/4mh27yt9
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25aug659
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.
Abstract :
This study explores the interrelationship between Knowledge Management (KM), Digital Literacy, and
Academic Performance in higher education, with a qualitative approach focusing on the experiences of students and
lecturers. KM plays a vital role in reducing information redundancy, ensuring quick access to relevant knowledge, and
fostering a culture of knowledge sharing within academic environments. Meanwhile, Digital Literacy equips students with
the skills to efficiently process, analyze, and utilize data through appropriate digital tools, expanding opportunities for
collaboration via online platforms, academic forums, and professional networks. The integration of KM and Digital
Literacy not only enhances academic efficiency and productivity but also strengthens innovation and collaborative
capabilities, preparing students to adapt to technological advancements and curriculum changes. Furthermore, this
synergy equips graduates with the competencies required to thrive in a knowledge-based economy and face the demands
of the digital era. Findings reveal that institutions embracing both KM practices and Digital Literacy development achieve
higher levels of academic engagement, collaborative innovation, and adaptive learning. The study underscores the need for
higher education to integrate KM frameworks and digital competency programs to optimize academic performance and
graduate employability in an increasingly competitive and technology-driven landscape.
Keywords :
Knowledge Management; Digital Literacy; Academic Performance.
References :
- S. Mhlongo, K. Mbatha, B. Ramatsetse, and R. Dlamini, “Challenges, opportunities, and prospects of adopting and using smart digital technologies in learning environments: An iterative review,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 6, 2023.
- O. T. Akintayo, C. A. Eden, O. O. Ayeni, and N. C. Onyebuchi, “Evaluating the impact of educational technology on learning outcomes in the higher education sector: A systematic review,” Int. J. Manag. Entrep. Res., vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1395–1422, 2024.
- A. Iqbal, “Innovation speed and quality in higher education institutions: the role of knowledge management enablers and knowledge sharing process,” J. Knowl. Manag., vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 2334–2360, 2021.
- E. Santos, M. Carvalho, and S. Martins, “Sustainable enablers of knowledge management strategies in a higher education institution,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 12, p. 5078, 2024.
- S. Quarchioni, S. Paternostro, and F. Trovarelli, “Knowledge management in higher education: a literature review and further research avenues,” Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 304–319, 2022.
- M. C. Martínez-Bravo, C. Sádaba Chalezquer, and J. Serrano-Puche, “Dimensions of digital literacy in the 21st century competency frameworks,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 1867, 2022.
- P. Ndibalema, “Digital literacy gaps in promoting 21st century skills among students in higher education institutions in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review,” Cogent Educ., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 2452085, 2025.
- G. Salimi, A. Roodsaz, M. Mohammadi, F. Keshavarzi, A. Mousavi, and Z. Zainuddin, “How students’ digital literacy promotes knowledge sharing and academic performance in online learning environments,” Int. J. Inf. Learn. Technol., vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 165–184, 2025.
- I. Bystrenina and P. Nikitin, “Adaptive knowledge control in digital learning as a factor in improving the quality of education,” Educ. Sci., vol. 12, no. 10, p. 638, 2022.
- O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, J. Hartig, F. Goldhammer, and J. Krstev, “Students’ online information use and learning progress in higher education–A critical literature review,” Stud. High. Educ., vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 1996–2021, 2021.
- P. Holm, “Impact of digital literacy on academic achievement: Evidence from an online anatomy and physiology course,” E-Learning Digit. Media, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 139–155, 2025.
- C. Wekerle, M. Daumiller, and I. Kollar, “Using digital technology to promote higher education learning: The importance of different learning activities and their relations to learning outcomes,” J. Res. Technol. Educ., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2022.
- S. Zakir et al., “Digital literacy and academic performance: the mediating roles of digital informal learning, self-efficacy, and students’ digital competence,” in Frontiers in Education, 2025, vol. 10, p. 1590274.
- G. I. Sari, S. Winasis, I. Pratiwi, and U. W. Nuryanto, “Strengthening digital literacy in Indonesia: Collaboration, innovation, and sustainability education,” Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open, vol. 10, p. 101100, 2024.
- D. Georgiou, S. E. Gallagher, and K. A. Chmielewska, “Beyond the challenge: Exploring student, lecturer, and stakeholder challenges with challenge-based learning,” Act. Learn. High. Educ., p. 14697874251326100, 2025.
- M. Mahmoudi-Dehaki and N. Nasr-Esfahani, “Rethinking Research in Higher Education: A Scholarly Exploration,” in Enhancing Research Output in Higher Education: Research Proposals, Profiles, and Publishing, IGI Global Scientific Publishing, 2025, pp. 1–38.
- A. Ansori, N. Tarihoran, A. Mujib, E. Syarifudin, and R. Firdaos, “Systematic mapping in the topic of Islamic education management and education management based on bibliometric analysis,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, 2024, vol. 3098, no. 1.
- H. Tinmaz, M. Fanea-Ivanovici, and H. Baber, “A snapshot of digital literacy,” Libr. Hi Tech News, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 20–23, 2023.
- J. Ding, T. Chen, and G. Lu, “Analysis of the connotation of digital literacy and related literacy,” Int J New Dev Educ, vol. 5, no. 23, pp. 1–10, 2023.
- V. I. Marín and L. Castaneda, “Developing digital literacy for teaching and learning,” in Handbook of open, distance and digital education, Springer, 2022, pp. 1–20.
- K. Ibacache, A. R. Koob, and E. Vance, “Emergency remote library instruction and tech tools: A matter of equity during a pandemic,” Inf. Technol. Libr., vol. 40, no. 2, 2021.
- R. F. O. Cayubit, “Why learning environment matters? An analysis on how the learning environment influences the academic motivation, learning strategies and engagement of college students,” Learn. Environ. Res., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 581–599, 2022.
- M. Al-Okaily, S. Magatef, A. Al-Okaily, and F. S. Shiyyab, “Exploring the factors that influence academic performance in Jordanian higher education institutions,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 13, 2024.
- J. Jovanović, M. Saqr, S. Joksimović, and D. Gašević, “Students matter the most in learning analytics: The effects of internal and instructional conditions in predicting academic success,” Comput. Educ., vol. 172, p. 104251, 2021.
- O. Guterman, “Academic success from an individual perspective: A proposal for redefinition,” Int. Rev. Educ., vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 403–413, 2021.
- A. Silamut and T. Sovajassatakul, “Self-directed learning with knowledge management model on academic achievement and digital literacy abilities for employees of a Thai energy organization,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 5149–5163, 2021.
- V. Pereira and U. Bamel, “Extending the resource and knowledge based view: A critical analysis into its theoretical evolution and future research directions,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 132, pp. 557–570, 2021.
- C. Cooper, V. Pereira, D. Vrontis, and Y. Liu, “Extending the resource and knowledge based view: Insights from new contexts of analysis,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 156. Elsevier, p. 113523, 2023.
- M. Ajmal, Z. Islam, and A. Islam, “Enhancing organizational performance in higher education through knowledge-centered culture and absorptive capacity: the mediating role of the knowledge creation process,” Learn. Organ., 2025.
- M. M. Ávila, “Competitive advantage and knowledge absorptive capacity: The mediating role of innovative capability,” J. Knowl. Econ., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 185–210, 2022.
- S. Farias-Gaytan, I. Aguaded, and M.-S. Ramirez-Montoya, “Transformation and digital literacy: Systematic literature mapping,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 1417–1437, 2022.
- L. Van Audenhove, L. Vermeire, W. Van den Broeck, and A. Demeulenaere, “Data literacy in the new EU DigComp 2.2 framework how DigComp defines competences on artificial intelligence, internet of things and data,” Inf. Learn. Sci., vol. 125, no. 5/6, pp. 406–436, 2024.
- A. R. Trindade, D. Holley, and C. G. Marques, “Skills for Safety, Security, and Well-Being in the DigComp Framework Revision and Their Relevance for a Sustainable Global (Higher) Education,” in Technologies for sustainable global higher education, Auerbach Publications, 2023, pp. 45–75.
- M. S. Abubakari, G. A. N. Zakaria, and J. Musa, “Validating the DigComp framework among university students across different educational systems,” Discov. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 200, 2025.
- S. T. Akyıldız and K. H. Ahmed, “An overview of qualitative research and focus group discussion,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2021.
- N. Jain, “Survey versus interviews: Comparing data collection tools for exploratory research,” Qual. Rep., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 541–554, 2021.
- W. M. Lim, “What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines,” Australas. Mark. J., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 199–229, 2025.
- M. M. H. Emon, “Research Approach: A Comparative Analysis of Quantitative and Qualitative Methodologies in Social Science Research,” 2024.
- J. Thompson Burdine, S. Thorne, and G. Sandhu, “Interpretive description: A flexible qualitative methodology for medical education research,” Med. Educ., vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 336–343, 2021.
- N. T. T. Minh, “Exploring qualitative data collection methods for dissertation research,” in Qualitative research methods for dissertation research, IGI Global Scientific Publishing, 2025, pp. 81–124.
- M. Zamiri and A. Esmaeili, “Methods and technologies for supporting knowledge sharing within learning communities: A systematic literature review,” Adm. Sci., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 17, 2024.
- E. Lacka, T. C. Wong, and M. Y. Haddoud, “Can digital technologies improve students’ efficiency? Exploring the role of Virtual Learning Environment and Social Media use in Higher Education,” Comput. Educ., vol. 163, p. 104099, 2021.
- W. Zeng, “An investigation into digital literacy and autonomous learning of high school students,” English Lang. Teach., vol. 16, no. 2, p. 131, 2023.
This study explores the interrelationship between Knowledge Management (KM), Digital Literacy, and
Academic Performance in higher education, with a qualitative approach focusing on the experiences of students and
lecturers. KM plays a vital role in reducing information redundancy, ensuring quick access to relevant knowledge, and
fostering a culture of knowledge sharing within academic environments. Meanwhile, Digital Literacy equips students with
the skills to efficiently process, analyze, and utilize data through appropriate digital tools, expanding opportunities for
collaboration via online platforms, academic forums, and professional networks. The integration of KM and Digital
Literacy not only enhances academic efficiency and productivity but also strengthens innovation and collaborative
capabilities, preparing students to adapt to technological advancements and curriculum changes. Furthermore, this
synergy equips graduates with the competencies required to thrive in a knowledge-based economy and face the demands
of the digital era. Findings reveal that institutions embracing both KM practices and Digital Literacy development achieve
higher levels of academic engagement, collaborative innovation, and adaptive learning. The study underscores the need for
higher education to integrate KM frameworks and digital competency programs to optimize academic performance and
graduate employability in an increasingly competitive and technology-driven landscape.
Keywords :
Knowledge Management; Digital Literacy; Academic Performance.