Authors : Rasuli Semgonja Omary; Rev. Victorini Salema; Fortunatus M. Mbua

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 9 - September

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3c5sna9k

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/45u75t5v

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24SEP566

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : Authentic determination of evidence of students’ academic achievement is demonstrated in the best way by using a table of specification in which this study aimed at making its focus. Thus, study sought to investigatethe extent that history teachers prepare table of specification in enhancing academic achievements in public secondary schools in Mwanga district, Tanzania. Anchored on Validity theory, proposed by Messick in 1989, the study employed a convergent design under mixed methods approach to collect information from target population of 144 history teachers, 135 school quality assurers, 27 heads of school, 27 heads of history department, 1 chief quality assurer and 1 district secondary education officer made a total of 308 respondents. Sample size has total of 150 respondents that comprised 69 history teachers, 16 heads of schools, 16 heads of history department, 1 chief quality assurer and 48 school internal quality assurers that were selected through stratified and simple random sampling techniques. The study used questionnaire to obtain quantitative data from history teachers and school internal quality assurers and interview guide to acquire qualitative data from chief quality assurer. The study also used interview schedule to obtain the information from the history head of departments and school internal quality assurers. Validity of instruments was established through research experts in assessment and evaluation in the faculty of education from Mwenge Catholic University. Cronbach Alpha technique was used to establish the reliability of the Likert type items constituted in the questionnaires at a coefficient of 0.820. Dependability of qualitative data collection instruments was ensured through triangulation and peer debriefing. The study adhered to research ethical issues such as: signing consent forms, confidentiality, anonymity, and citation and referencing to avoid plagiarism. The study revealed that: history teachers in public secondary schools prepare and use table of specifications to outline the topics and skills to be assessed in exams or assignments to the low extent. The study concludes that, history teachers in public secondary schools do not prepare and use table of specification to outline the topics and skills to be assessed in exams or assignments and hence they fail to consider cognitive levels of learning. The study recommends to the District Chief Quality Assurer to create awareness to history teachers on viability of the preparation and usability of the table of specifications to ensure validity of testing and assessment procedures. The study also recommends that, heads of history department should ensure that history teachers prepare and use table of specifications during the entire assessment process to ensure students’ higher academic achievements.

Keywords : Extensiveness, Table of Specifications, Academic Achievement, Assessment.

References :

1. Abate, T., &Mishore, E. (2024). Alignment Analysis between Teacher-made Tests with the    Learning Objectives in a Selected School of Central Regional State of Ethiopia. Heliyon.
2. Adewumi, M. G., & Babajide, V. F. (2020). "The Impact of Table of Specifications on Student Performance in Nigeria." African Educational Research Journal, 8(2), 101-110
3. Adiyaa, O., Appiah, K. E., & Osei-Poku, P. (2022). Achieving content validity of teacher made test in general knowledge in Art: A prerequisite assessment need for SHS teachers in Ghana.
4. AlFallay, I. S. (2018). Test Specifications and Blueprints: Reality and Expectations. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 195–210.
5. Almulla, M. A., & Al-Rahmi, W. M. (2023). Integrated social cognitive theory with learning input factors: The effects of problem-solving skills and critical thinking skills on learning performance sustainability. Sustainability, 15(5), 3978.
6. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2019). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman
7. Anderson, S. E., & Nderitu, S. (2022). Decentralized partnerships for school-based teacher development in Mombasa, Kenya. In Improving schools through teacher development (pp. 137-184h). Routledge.
8. Asadullah, M. N., Perera, L. D. H., & Xiao, S. (2020). Vietnam’s extraordinary performance in the PISA assessment: A cultural explanation of an education paradox. Journal of Policy Modeling, 42(5), 913-932.
9. Ati Ningsih, N., &SiwiAmumpuni, R. (2023). How to Construct TOS (Table of Specifications) for Testing Language?.
10. Baffoe, J. (2021). Effects of item sequencing in multiple-choice tests on senior high school students’ academic performance in the Kumasi metropolis: the moderating role of gender (Dissertation, University of Cape Coast).
11. Bechard, S., Karvonen, M., & Erickson, K. (2021). Opportunities and challenges of applying cognitive process dimensions to map-based learning and alternate assessment. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 6, p. 653693). Frontiers Media SA.
12. Berhe, G. G., Tesfemariam, G. M., &Weldemichae, G. H. (2024). Challenges for effective teaching of chemistry in secondary schools of developing countries: A review. African Journal of Chemical Education, 14(2), 61-100.
13. Brown, J. D. (2021). 26 Classical test theory James Dean Brown. The Routledge Handbook of Language Testing, 447.
14. Chapelle, C. A., & Lee, H. W. (2021). Conceptions of validity. In The Routledge handbook of language testing (pp. 17-31). Routledge.
15. Christie, C. A., &Alkin, M. C. (2023). An evaluation theory tree. Evaluation Roots: Theory Influencing Practice, 12.
16. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2020). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Learning Policy Institute
17. Dawadi, S., Shrestha, S., & Giri, R. A. (2021). Mixed-methods research: A discussion on its types, challenges, and criticisms. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 2(2), 25-36.
18. Dawadi, S., Shrestha, S., & Giri, R. A. (2021). Mixed-methods research: A discussion on its types, challenges, and criticisms. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 2(2), 25-36.
19. DBE (Department of Basic Education). (2021). "Assessment and Examinations." South African Department of Basic Education.
20. DeBoer, G. E. (2023). The use of content standards for curriculum reform in the United States: A historical analysis. In Handbook of research on science education (pp. 817-849). Routledge.
21. Deghaye, N. (2021). Disability support and accessibility in ordinary schools in South Africa. Department of Economics, University of Stellenbosch.
22. Egereonu, A. C. (2023). TEST- BLUE PRINT AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE VALIDITY            OF TEACHER MADE TESTS OF THREE STATE COLLEGES OF EDUCATION IN EASTERN STATES. IJFMR - International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, 3(7), 12.
23. Filgona, J., & Sakiyo, J. (2020). Teachers’ academic qualification as a predictor of attitude and academic achievement in geography of senior secondary school students in Adamawa state, Nigeria. International Journal of Research and Review, 7(11), 190-215.
24. Findley, M. G., Kikuta, K., & Denly, M. (2021). External validity. Annual Review of Political Science, 24(1), 365-393.
25. Gierl, M. J., Alves, C., & Majeau, R. T. (2018). Ensuring Content Validity Using Cognitive Models and an Automated Process for Test Development. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37(1), 12-21.
26. Gottlieb, M., Bailitz, J., Fix, M., Shappell, E., & Wagner, M. J. (2023). Educator’s blueprint:              A how‐to guide for developing high‐quality multiple‐choice questions. AEM Education and Training, 7(1), e10836. https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10836
27. Hu, Z., Lin, L., Wang, Y., & Li, J. (2021). The integration of classical testing theory and item response theory. Psychology, 12(9), 1397-1409.
28. Jouve, X. (2023). Reliability and concurrent validity of the Jouve-Cerebrals Test of Induction: A correlational study with SAT and RIST. Cogn-IQ Research Papers.
29. Karanja, L., & Mbugua, Z. (2019). Teachers’ Perception on the Use of Table of Specifications in Assessments in Secondary Schools. Educational Research and Reviews, 14(3), 94-102.
30. Kartowagiran, B., &Rohaeti, E. (2021). A Critical Thinking Assessment Model Integrated with Science Process Skills on Chemistry for Senior High School. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 285-298.
31. Lawson, C. A. (2023). Authenticity and Assessments: Using State Assessment Data to Understand the Impact of Federal Education Policy Change (Dissertation, University of Colorado Colorado Springs).
32. Maisiba, W., &Azaliwa, E. (2024). The Effects of Teachers’ Professional Competence On Students’ Academic Achievement In History Subject In Secondary Schools In Arusha District Council, Tanzania. Contemporary Journal of Education and Business (CJEB), 32.
33. Makiya, R., Mnyanyi, C., &Ngirwa, C. (2022). Quality assurance strategies in enhancing learning achievement among public primary schools in Arusha region, Tanzania. East African Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 3(2), 48-57.
34. Manzoor, A. (2020). Designs of mixed method research. In Cognitive Analytics: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 95-121). IGI Global.
35. Martone, A., & Sireci, S. G. (2020). Evaluating Alignment Between Curriculum, Assessment, and Instruction. Review of Educational Research, 80(4), 589-616.
36. Mashingia, K. (2023). Assessment of the implementation of practical skills in the secondary school curriculum for the realization of vision 2025 in Kilimanjaro region, Tanzania: Assessment of the implementation of practical skills in the secondary school curriculum inTanzania. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 15(3), 1622-1647.
37. McTighe, J., & Ferrara, S. (2021). Assessing student learning by design: Principles and practices for teachers and school leaders. Teachers College Press.
38. Meier, C., & West, J. (2020). Overcrowded classrooms–the Achilles heel of South African education?. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 10(1), 1-10.
39. Milawati, M. (2019). Blueprint as A Base In Building Better Teacher- Made Test. Prosodi,                          13, 119–128. https://doi.org/10.21107/prosodi.v13i2.6090
40. Mohan, R. (2023). Measurement, evaluation and assessment in education. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd..
41. Ndomondo, E., Mbise, A., &Katabaro, J. (2022). History teachers’ conceptualization of competency-based curriculum in transforming instructional practices in lower secondary schools in Tanzania. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 6(1), 100331.
42. Slaney, K., & Slaney, K. (2017). Historical precursors and early testing theory. Validating Psychological Constructs: Historical, Philosophical, and Practical Dimensions, 29-57.
43. Suurtamm, C., & Koch, M. J. (2019). The Role of Formative Assessment in Enabling Students’ Mathematical Competence. Journal of Educational Research, 112(3), 362-374.
44. Taherdoost, H. (2022). What are different research approaches? Comprehensive Review of Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method research, their applications, types, and limitations. Journal of Management Science & Engineering Research, 5(1), 53-63.
45. Wang, H., Hall, N. C., & Rahimi, S. (2020). Self-Efficacy and Causal Attributions in Teachers: Effects on Burnout, Job Satisfaction, Illness, and Quitting Intentions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 94, 103122.https://doi.org/