Authors : Nayeemuddin; Ansari Faiyaz Ahmed; Kamran Latif; Syed Mudassir; Khalid Rajeh Salim Al-Amri

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 10 - October

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/44en43ph

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/32hr7p3c

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24OCT079

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : The quest for sustainable materials the investigation into natural fibers for composite materials has been prompted by this development., aiming to reduce the environmental impact of traditional synthetic composites. In this study, we investigate the potential of flax, hemp, jute, kenaf, and ramie fibers as reinforcements in green composites fabricated using the Water Soaking Method (WSM). The evaluation parameters considered include density (g/cm3), fiber diameter (μm), tensile strength (MPa), Young’s modulus (GPa), and elongation at break (%). Through meticulous experimentation and analysis, it is revealed that jute emerges as the frontrunner among the alternatives, exhibiting superior performance across multiple evaluation parameters. Jute-based green composites demonstrate commendable strength and stiffness properties, coupled with a moderate density, making them promising candidates for various structural applications. Conversely, kenaf fiber-based composites exhibit the lowest performance in terms of evaluated parameters, indicating potential limitations in its suitability for high-performance applications. The comparative assessment underscores the significance of material selection in composite fabrication, emphasizing the diverse mechanical properties exhibited by different natural fibers. Furthermore, the utilization of the WSM method showcases its effectiveness in producing green composites with desirable characteristics, signifying its potential as a viable manufacturing technique for sustainable materials. eco-friendly composites, highlighting the importance of considering multiple factors such as fiber type and fabrication method in achieving optimal performance and environmental sustainability in composite materials. Further research may delve into refining fabrication techniques and exploring novel fiber combinations applications.

Keywords : Component; Formatting; Style; Styling; Insert.

References :

1. Bismarck, A., Mishra, S., & Lampke, T. (2017). Green Composites: Sustainable and Biodegradable Materials for Next-Generation Applications. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 56(20), 5172-5205.
2. Mohanty, A. K., Misra, M., & Drzal, L. T. (2002). Sustainable Bio-Composites from Renewable Resources: Opportunities and Challenges in the Green Materials World. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 10(1-2), 19-26.
3. John, M. J., & Thomas, S. (2008). Biofibres and Biocomposites. Carbohydrate Polymers, 71(3), 343-364.
4. Pickering, K. L., Efendy, M. G. A., & Le, T. M. (2016). A Review of Recent Developments in Natural Fibre Composites and Their Mechanical Performance. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 83, 98-112.
5. Faruk, O., Bledzki, A. K., Fink, H. P., & Sain, M. (2014). Biocomposites Reinforced with Natural Fibers: 2000-2010. Progress in Polymer Science, 37(11), 1552-1596.
6. Müssig, J. (2010). Industrial Applications of Natural Fibres: Structure, Properties, and Technical Applications. John Wiley & Sons.
7. Thakur, V. K., Thakur, M. K., & Raghavan, P. (2014). Handbook of Composites from Renewable Materials: Structure and Chemistry. John Wiley & Sons.
8. Baillie, C. A., & Matthews, F. L. (1999). Introduction to Composite Materials Design (Second Edition). CRC Press.
9. Oksman, K., & Selin, J. F. (1999). Natural Fibres as Reinforcement in Polymers: Chemistry, Processing, and Properties. Woodhead Publishing.
10. Kalia, S., Kaith, B. S., & Kaur, I. (2009). Pretreatments of Natural Fibres and Their Application as Reinforcing Material in Polymer Composites—A Review. Polymer Engineering & Science, 49(7), 1253-1272.
11. Puglia, D., Biagiotti, J., & Kenny, J. M. (2005). A Review on Natural Fiber-Based Composites—Part I. Journal of Natural Fibers, 1(2), 37-68.
12. Baley, C. (2002). Analysis of the Flax Fibre Reinforcement of Composite Materials. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 33(7), 939-948.
13. Nair, K., & Thomas, S. (2001). Rheology and Processing of Polymer Nanocomposites. Woodhead Publishing.
14. Thomason, J. L. (2002). The Influence of Fibre Length and Concentration on the Properties of Glass Fibre Reinforced Polypropylene: 5. Injection Moulded Long and Short Fibre PP. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 33(12), 1641-1652.
15. Herrera-Franco, P. J., & Valadez-Gonzalez, A. (2005). A study of the Mechanical Properties of Short Natural-Fiber Reinforced Composites. Composites Part B: Engineering, 36(8), 597-608.
16. Summerscales, J., Dissanayake, N. P. J., Virk, A. S., & Hall, W. (2010). A Review of Bast Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 41(9), 1336-1344.
17. Dhakal, H. N., Zhang, Z. Y., & Richardson, M. O. W. (2007). Effect of Water Absorption on the Mechanical Properties of Hemp Fibre Reinforced Unsaturated Polyester Composites. Composites Science and Technology, 67(7-8), 1674-1683.
18. Li, Y., & Mai, Y. W. (2002). Effects of Water Absorption on the Mechanical Properties of Hemp Fibre Reinforced
19. Triantaphyllou, E. (2000). Multi-criteria decision-making methods: a comparative study. Springer.
20. Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9-26.
21. Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Springer.
22. Fishburn, P. C. (1967). Additive utilities with incomplete product sets: application to priorities and assignments. Operations Research, 15(3), 537-542.
23. Triantaphyllou, E., & Mann, S. H. (1995). Using the analytic hierarchy process for decision making in engineering applications: some challenges. International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Applications and Practice, 2(1), 35-44.
24. Ghorabaee, M. K., Zavadskas, E. K., Olfat, L., & Turskis, Z. (2015). Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS). Informatica, 26(3), 435-451.
25. Drobne, S., & Lisec, A. (2009). Multi-attribute decision analysis in GIS: weighted linear combination and ordered weighted averaging. Informatica, 33(4), 459-474.
26.  Mayyas, A., Shen, Q., El-Sayegh, M., & Abdelhamid, M. (2015). A multi-criteria decision-making model for sustainable product design and material selection. Journal of Industrial Production Engineering, 32(7), 443-453.
27. [Zopounidis, C., & Doumpos, M. (2002). Multi-criteria decision aid in financial decision making: methodologies and literature review. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 11(4-5), 167-186.
28. Velasquez, M., & Hester, P. T. (2013). An analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods. International Journal of Operations Research, 10(2), 56-66.