Authors : Tri Budi Santoso; Linda Harumi

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 11 - November

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3ynzetx7

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/3bu9ttyw

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25nov1055

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

Abstract : This qualitative study explored factors influencing occupational therapy (OT) students' self-efficacy prior to clinical fieldwork, a crucial component of their training. Drawing on Bandura's social cognitive theory, the study aimed to understand how academic preparation, practical experiences, and support systems contribute to students' confidence and readiness. We purposively sampled six occupational therapy students (ages 20-22, 5 females, 1 male) and had them participate in in-depth interviews. Thematic analysis revealed four key themes: experience studying in an OT program (increasing insight/knowledge, learning challenges), support for course materials and learning methods (clinical simulation, case studies), social and campus facility support (lecturer, friend, family, and campus facility support), and mentorship from clinical supervisors and the clinical environment. Findings highlight the significant impact of hands-on training, empathetic support, and institutional resources on self-efficacy. The study suggests that educational institutions should develop targeted curricula and interventions, such as enhanced simulation training and robust support networks, to optimally prepare students for the complexities of clinical practice and foster resilience.

Keywords : Self-Efficacy, Occupational Therapy, Clinical Fieldwork.

References :

1. American Occupational Therapy Association. (2018). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process (3rd ed.). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72(Suppl. 2), 1–87. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2018.72S219
2. Artino, A. R. (2012). Academic self-efficacy: From educational theory to instructional practice. Perspectives on Medical Education, 1(2), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-012-0012-5
3. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company.
5. Thomas, Y., & Packer, T. (2019). The impact of fieldwork on student learning in occupational therapy: A qualitative study. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 66(2), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12521
6. Mulholland, S., & Derdall, M. (2020). Building student confidence in occupational therapy practice: A review of simulation and mentorship strategies. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 83(3), 180–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022619880241
7. Hanson, D. J. (2021). Student self-doubt and performance anxiety in clinical practice: Understanding and strategies. Journal of Allied Health, 50(1), 45–51.
8. Hoel, K. A., Swanson, L. A., & Atler, K. E. (2021). Simulation in occupational therapy education: Building student confidence for fieldwork. Journal of Occupational Therapy Education, 5(3), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.26681/jote.2021.050302
9. Cahill, S. M., Egan, B. E., & Seber, J. (2020). Occupational therapy student perspectives on learning during COVID-19: Challenges and opportunities. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 40(4), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/1539449220951044
10. Chen, Y. L., Lee, H. C., & Chang, W. C. (2021). Using digital platforms and clinical case videos to enhance learning outcomes in occupational therapy education. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 6(4), 567–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-020-00159-6
11. Lee, S. Y., Choi, H. J., & Kim, J. A. (2023). Therapeutic self-application and professional growth among occupational therapy students: A qualitative study. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 30(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2022.0036
12. Johnson, R., Marks, R., & Shin, H. (2021). Measuring self-efficacy among occupational therapy students: Validation of a new tool. Occupational Therapy International, 2021, Article ID 8897632. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8897632
13. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
14. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
15. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
16. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
17. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
18. Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
19. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
20. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
21. Hooper, B., Krishnagiri, S., Price, S., Bilics, A., & Taff, S. D. (2020). Curriculum design in occupational therapy education: Process and influences. Journal of Occupational Therapy Education, 4(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.26681/jote.2020.040202
22. Bossers, A., Cook, J. V., Polatajko, H. J., & Laine, C. (2017). Understanding professional identity: Students’ perspectives. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(3), 130–139.
23. Ashby, S. E., Ryan, S., & Gray, M. (2016). Cultural competence in occupational therapy education: A review of current methods. Occupational Therapy International, 23(2), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.1414
24. Black, R. M., & Wells, S. A. (2018). Interventions to promote cultural competence in occupational therapy: A scoping review. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 65(4), 276–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12461
25. Crist, P., Duncan, M. J., & Schmalzried, R. (2017). Bridging the gap: Integrating theory and practice in fieldwork education. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 31(4), 360–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380577.2017.1353794
26. Buchanan, H., Louw, Q., & Mothabeng, J. D. (2020). Occupational therapy students’ readiness for clinical learning: A South African perspective. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.17159/2310-3833/2020/vol50n1a4
27. Tryssenaar, J., & Perkins, J. (2019). From student to therapist: Exploring the transition. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(10), 421–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802269906201002
28. Thomas, Y., & Thomas, J. (2018). Preparing students for clinical placements: The value of a pre-placement simulation program. Australian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(3), 236–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12435
29. Scaffa, M. E., & Wooster, D. M. (2017). Occupational therapy in community-based practice settings (2nd ed.). F.A. Davis Company.
30. Ozelie, R., Janow, J., Kreutz, C., Mulry, M. K., & Penkala, M. (2019). Students’ perceptions of the effectiveness of simulation in occupational therapy education. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 73(4), 7304205080p1–7304205080p6. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2019.033365
31. Shoemaker, M. J., Beasley, K. R., & Cooper, R. A. (2021). Interprofessional education and practice in occupational therapy: An evidence-based update. Journal of Allied Health, 50(2), 123–130.
32. Hitch, D., Nicola-Richmond, K., & Larkin, H. (2019). Peer learning and mentoring in clinical education: A narrative review. Medical Teacher, 41(12), 1363–1370. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2019.1651342