Factors Influencing E-Government Adoption in Sri Lanka: A Concept Paper for Developing a Conceptual Framework


Authors : Ayesha Godagama; Dr. Ali Khatibi; Dr. S. M. Ferdous Azam; Dr. Forbis Ahamed

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 11 - November


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/97nuy44m

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/4umxf46j

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25nov1210

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.


Abstract : This study aims to present a comprehensive conceptual framework to examine the factors affecting behavioral intention (BI) to use e-government services towards e-government adoption in the Sri Lankan context. After reviewing previous literature, a model is proposed for e-government adoption in Sri Lanka which includes five factors: Perceived Behavioral Control (Self-efficacy and Facilitating Conditions), Attitude, Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, and Trust in Government. According to the framework, Perceived Behavioral Control (PBC) (Self-efficacy and Facilitating Conditions), Attitude (AT), Performance Expectancy (PE), Effort Expectancy (EE), Trust in Government (TG) have direct impact on behavioural intention (BI) to use e-government services. Further, Behavioural Intention (BI) use e-government services has indirect impact to e-government adoption.

Keywords : E-Government Adoption, Digital Government, Behavioural Intention , Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy.

References :

  1. UN , 2024, Department economic and social  affairs, https://desapublications.un.org/sites/default/files/publications/2024-09/%28Chapter%201%29%20E-Government%20Survey%202024%201392024.pdf
  2. UN, e-government (2025) https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Overview
  3. Abdullah, Н. Н. (2021). Factors Affecting the Adoption of e-Government in Public Sector Organizations of Kurdistan Region. Аспекти публічного управління9(2), 15-27
  4. Totonchi, A., & Mohadis, H. B. M. (2025). E-Government Between Developed and Developing Countries: Key Perspectives from Denmark and Iraq. Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Informasi18(1), 77-93.
  5. Abdullah, Н. Н. (2021). Factors Affecting the Adoption of e-Government in Public Sector Organizations of Kurdistan Region. Аспекти публічного управління9(2), 15-27
  6. Totonchi, A., & Mohadis, H. B. M. (2025). E-Government Between Developed and Developing Countries: Key Perspectives from Denmark and Iraq. Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Informasi18(1), 77-93.
  7. Yuliantini, L. S., & Purnomo, E. P. (2024). The Compartive Analysis of E-Government Development in Denmark and Estonia. Available at SSRN 4782364.
  8. Totonchi, A., & Mohadis, H. B. M. (2025). E-Government Between Developed and Developing Countries: Key Perspectives from Denmark and Iraq. Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Informasi18(1), 77-93.
  9. Fernando, R. L. S., & Gunasekara, H. O. C. (2023). Public Value and Level of E-government in Sri Lanka: Problems and Prospects. International   Journal of Governance and Public Policy Analysis, 5(02).
  10. Rainford, S. (2006). e-Sri Lanka: An integrated      approach to E-government case study. Regional Development Dialogue, 27(2), 209-218.
  11. Hettiarachchi, N., & Lakmal, H. (2023). Public awareness, usage of E-government services in Sri Lanka. Askey, Public Awareness, Usage of E-government Services in Sri Lanka (July 31,2023). JETIR, 10(8).
  12. ICTA( 2021) , Outcome Assessment: The Hospital Health Information Management System (HHIMS) Project.
  13. Withanage, P., Gunawardena, L., & Endagamage, D. M. (2022). Why the Utilization of E- government Services is Poor?–A study with the Citizens in Colombo Municipal Council Area in Sri Lanka. Integrated Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities, 2, 7-13.
  14. United Nation. (2022). UN e-government survey 2022https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2022
  15. United Nations. (2024). Country Data. UN-E-Government Knowledge base. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Data-Center
  16. Zahid, H., Ali, S., Abu-Shanab, E., & Javed, H. M. U. (2022). Determinants of intention to use e-government services: An integrated marketing relation view. Telematics and Informatics68, 101778
  17. Almaiah, M. A., & Nasereddin, Y. (2020). Factors influencing the adoption of E-government services among Jordanian citizens. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 16(3), 236-259.
  18. Tremblay-Cantin, C. A., Mellouli, S., Cheikh-Ammar, M., & Khechine, H. (2023). E-government service adoption by citizens: A literature review and a high-level model of influential factors. Digital government: research and practice4(1), 1-24.;
  19. Withanage, P., Gunawardena, L., & Endagamage, D. M. (2022). Why the Utilization of E-government Services is Poor?–A study with the Citizens in Colombo Municipal Council Area in Sri Lanka. Integrated Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities, 2, 7-13.
  20. Dilhani, V. I., & Priyashantha, K. G. (2021, November). Determinants of Intention to Use E-

        government Services in Sri Lanka. In Proceedings of the   12th International Conference on Business & Information (ICBI 2021).

  1. Hettiarachchi, N., & Lakmal, H. (2023). Public awareness, usage of E-government services in Sri Lanka. Askey, Public Awareness, Usage of E-government Services in Sri Lanka (July 31,2023). JETIR, 10(8).
  2. Dissanayake,(2024), Factors Effecting to the E-government implementation -Special Reference to Employees of Provincial Councils in Sri Lanka, Conference: 8th Proceedings of CIPM International Symposium , At: Sri Lanka
  3. Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
  4. Venkatesh, v.; morris, m.g.; davis, g.b.; davis, f.d.(2003) user acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. mis q. , 27, 425–478
  5. Aleisa, N. (2024). Key factors influencing the e-government adoption: a systematic literature review. Journal of Innovative Digital Transformation1(1), 14-31.
  6. Almufti, M., Sellami, R., & Belguith, L. H. (2024, February). Validation of a Measuring Model as a Key Aspect in the Adoption of E-Government in Developing Countries. In 2024 5th International Conference on Advancements in Computational Sciences (ICACS) (pp. 1-7). IEEE.
  7. Totonchi, A., & Mohadis, H. B. M. (2025). E-Government Between Developed and Developing Countries: Key Perspectives from Denmark and Iraq. Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Informasi18(1), 77-93.
  8. Senshaw, D., & Twinomurinzi, H. (2021). The moderating effect of gender on adopting digital government innovations in ethiopia. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.09960.
  9. Adeel, A., Ahmed, K., Khan, S. A., Hanif, H. M., & Daghriri, Y. Q. (2023). Citizens' intentions to adopt innovative E-government services: a technology-adoption perspective. International Journal of E-Entrepreneurship and Innovation (IJEEI)13(1), 1-20.
  10. Afrizal, D., & Wallang, M. (2021). Attitude on intention to use e-government in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science22(1), 435-441
  11. Rainford, S. (2006). e-Sri Lanka: An integrated approach to e-government case study. Regional Development Dialogue27(2), 209-218.
  12. Ministry of Finance Sri Lanka , Budget estimates, 2024-2025 https://www.treasury.gov.lk/web/budget-estimates/section/budget%20estimates%202024
  13. Smart Gateway to Sri Lanka , (2025), https://www.gov.lk/government/eservicesibid
  14. Ministry of Finance Sri Lanka , Budget estimates, 2024-2025 https://www.treasury.gov.lk/web/budget-estimates/section/budget%20estimates%202024
  15. Ministry of Digital Economy, 2025).  Ministry of Digital Economy
  16. ICTA( 2021) , Outcome Assessment: The Hospital Health Information Management System (HHIMS) Project.
  17. United Nations. (2024). Country Data. UN-E-Government Knowledge base. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Data-Center
  18. Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International journal of man-machine studies, 38(3), 475-487.
  19. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  20. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information systems research, 6(2), 144-176.
  21. Haridy, S. M., Gaber, H. R., & Elsamadicy, A. (2025).  Factors Affecting Customers’ Attitudes Toward the Intention to Use Electronic Government Services in Egypt. The Academic Journal of Contemporary Commercial Research5(1), 72-90.
  22. Zorali, S., & Kanipek, K. (2023). An empirical research on the determination of effective factors in E-Government acceptance and use: Northern Cyprus Case. Sage Open13(4), 21582440231214092.
  23. Sultana, J., Kibria, M. G., & Teoh, S. Y. (2024). Understanding the e-government adoption behaviour in a developing country: a case of Bangladesh. Electronic Government, an International Journal20(2), 139-160.
  24. Venkatesh, v.; morris, m.g.; davis, g.b.; davis, f.d.(2003) user acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. mis q. , 27, 425–478
  25. Orbawati, E., Nugraha, J. T., Azizah, M., & Ikhtiara, S. (2025). Analyzing Determinants of E-Government Use Among Students: An Integrated UTAUT and E-Government Adoption Model. JITSI: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Sistem Informasi6(3), 258-266.
  26. Nasri, Wadie. "Citizens’ acceptance and use of e-government services in Tunisia: a UTAUT2-based approach." Management & Sustainability: An Arab Review (2025).
  27. Almamy, A. S. M. (2022). Understanding factors affecting E-government adoption in Saudi Arabia: the role of religiosity. International Journal of Customer Relationship Marketingand Management (IJCRMM), 13(1), 1-15.
  28. Xin, Y., Dilanchiev, A., Ali, M., Irfan, M., & Hong, Y. (2022). Assessing citizens’ attitudes and intentions to adopt E-government services: a roadmap toward sustainable development. Sustainability14(22), 15183
  29. Saengchai, S., Sriyakul, T., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2020). The impact of citizen trust, citizendisposition and favourable social characteristics on the adoption of e-government:Mediating roles of perceived behavioural control. International Journal of Innovation,Creativity, and Change, 12(11), 375-393
  30. Lingga, I. S., Eddy, E. P. S., Dewi, N. L., & Saputra, C. A. R. (2021). Analysis of Using e-Filingwith The Implementation of Theory of Planned Behavior. KINERJA, 25(2), 192-204.
  31. Venkatesh, v.; morris, m.g.; davis, g.b.; davis, f.d.(2003) user acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. mis q. , 27, 425–478
  32. Wahi, N. S., & Berenyi, L. (2024). Examining the Effect of Social Influence and Facilitating Conditions on E-government Adoption by Employees in Mandatory Condition. In Proceedings of the Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days 2024 (pp. 104-110)
  33. Khan, N. A., Maialeh, R., Akhtar, M., & Ramzan, M. (2024). The role of AI Self-Efficacy in religious contexts in public sector: The Social Cognitive Theory perspective. Public Organization Review24(3), 1015-1036.
  34. Mushi, R. M. (2023). Assessing the factors influencing intention to use E-government inTanzania: the perspective of trust, participation and transparency. Journal of ElectronicBusiness & Digital Economics, (ahead-of-print).
  35. Gupta, P., Hooda, A., Jeyaraj, A., Seddon, J. J., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2025). Trust, risk, privacy and security in e-Government use: Insights from a MASEM analysis. Information Systems Frontiers27(3), 1089-1105.
  36. Barbosa, J. D. S., & Mota, F. P. B. (2022). Adoption of e-government: a study on the role of trust. Revista de Administracao pública, 56, 441-464.
  37. Chai, C. S., Chiu, T. K., Wang, X., Jiang, F., & Lin, X. F. (2022). Modeling Chinese secondary school students’ behavioral intentions to learn artificial intelligence with the theory of planned behavior and self-determination theory. Sustainability, 15(1), 605
  38. Camilleri, M. A. (2020). The online users’ perceptions toward electronic government services. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society18(2), 221-235.
  39. Aswar, K., Julianto, W., Sumardjo, M., Panjaitan, I., & Nasir, A. (2023). An investigation of the factors affecting citizens’ adoption of E-government in Indonesia. Probl. Perspect. Manag, 21, 187-197.
  40. AlAwadhi, S., Alansari, H., & Alsaber, A. R. (2024). Explicating Trust-building FactorsImpacting the Use of E-government Services. Social Science Computer Review, 42(5),1244-1265.

This study aims to present a comprehensive conceptual framework to examine the factors affecting behavioral intention (BI) to use e-government services towards e-government adoption in the Sri Lankan context. After reviewing previous literature, a model is proposed for e-government adoption in Sri Lanka which includes five factors: Perceived Behavioral Control (Self-efficacy and Facilitating Conditions), Attitude, Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, and Trust in Government. According to the framework, Perceived Behavioral Control (PBC) (Self-efficacy and Facilitating Conditions), Attitude (AT), Performance Expectancy (PE), Effort Expectancy (EE), Trust in Government (TG) have direct impact on behavioural intention (BI) to use e-government services. Further, Behavioural Intention (BI) use e-government services has indirect impact to e-government adoption.

Keywords : E-Government Adoption, Digital Government, Behavioural Intention , Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
30 - November - 2025

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe