Authors : Kristina F. Mission; Dolores D. Versano

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 1 - January

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/5hpujwuj

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/5xnmekwy

DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14890829

Abstract : This study focused on the students’ performance in Bread and Pastry Production and how it is affected by the written works and hands-on activities. The study was conducted in Cluster II, comprising the city of San Pablo, located in the Third Congressional District in the province of Laguna. Ninety students in public high schools served as respondents. The student’s performance in Bread and Pastry Production was gauged regarding students' and teachers’ factors. Fifteen students by section were used. Four written tests and hands-on activities were prepared to comprise the lessons under TLE-BPP 8 third quarter; every other week, written tests and hands-on activities were used after the lesson. The result of the study showed that the teacher factors such as knowledge and pedagogy, skills, and teaching strategies are not significantly correlated with students’ performance in written works and hands-on activities. This result means that these teacher factors did not greatly influence the student's performance in class. It is recommended that TLE teachers advocate for Learners' development in Bread and Pastry Production and other areas of Technology and Livelihood Education by conducting seminars at least once a year to give teachers the necessary knowledge.

Keywords : Students’ Performance; Teacher Factor; Students’ Factor; Written Test; Hands-On Activities.

References :

1. Abosalem, Y. (2016). Assessment techniques and students’ higher-order thinking skills. International Journal of Secondary Education, 4(1), 1-11.
2. Åkerfeldt, A. (2014). Re-shaping of writing in the digital age-a study of pupils’ writing with different resources. Nordic Journal of Digital        Literacy, 9(3), 172-193.
3. Balakrishnan, V., & Gan, C. L. (2016). Students’ learning styles and their effects on the use of social media technology for learning. Telematics and Informatics, 33(3), 808-821.
4. Black, P., &Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in education: Principles, policy & practice, 25(6), 551-575.
5. Bietenbeck, J., Piopiunik, M., &Wiederhold, S. (2018). Africa’s skill tragedy does teachers’ lack of knowledge lead to low    student performance?. Journal of Human Resources, 53(3), 553- 578.
6. Brown, C. (2014). Patterns of innovation. The Education Digest, 79(9), 37.
7. Cabansag, M. G. S. (2014). Impact statements on the K-12 science program in the enhanced basic education curriculum in provincial schools. Researchers World, 5(2), 29.
8. Guiamalon, T. (2021). Teachers issues and concerns on the use of modular learning modality. IJASOS-International E-Journal of Advances in Social Sciences, 7(20), 457-469.
9. Hanushek, E. A., Piopiunik, M., &Wiederhold, S. (2019).
10. The value of smarter teachers international evidence on teacher cognitive                skills and student performance. Journal of Human Resources, 54(4), 857-899.
11. Ichsan, I. Z. (2018, July 12). Improving Students’ Motoric Skills Through Jeschke, C., Kuhn, C., Heinze, A., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Saas, H., &Lindmeier, A. M. (2021, July). Teachers’ ability to apply their subject-specific knowledge in instructional settings—A qualitative comparative study in the subjects mathematics and economics. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 6, p. 683962). Frontiers Media SA.
12. Konak, A., Clark, T. K., & Nasereddin, M. (2014). Using Kolb's Experiential Kone, K. (2015, May). The Impact of Performance-Based Assessment on University ESL Learners Retrieved from http://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.gci?referer=
13. Kpolovie, P. J., Joe, A. I., &Okoto, T. (2014). Academic achievement prediction: ole of interest in learning and attitude towards school. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education (IJHSSE), 1(11), 73-100.
14. Marsh, J., Hannon, P., Lewis, M., & Ritchie, L. (2017). Young children’s initiation into family literacy practices in the digital age. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 15(1), 47-60.
15. Mart, C. T. (2013). A passionate teacher: Teacher commitment and dedication to student learning. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 2(1), 437- 442.
16. Mateo (October 2020). Written Works, Performance Tasks: Here’s How Students Will Be Graded This School Year. One News, Youth and education.
17. Petrich, M., Wilkinson, K., & Bevan, B. (2013). It looks like fun, but are they learning?. In Design, make, play (pp. 68-88). Routledge
18. Shahiri, A. M., & Husain, W. (2015). A review on predicting student's performance using data mining techniques. Procedia Computer Science, 72, 414-422.
19. Tabuena, A. C. (2019). Effectiveness of classroom assessment techniques in improving performance of students in music and piano. Global Researchers Journal, 6(1), 68-78.
20. Vardi, I. (2013). Effectively feeding forward from one written assessment task to the next. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(5), 599-610.
21. Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja, Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. Technological pedagogical content knowledge–a review of the literature. Journal of computer assisted learning, 29(2), 109- 121.
22. Willingham, D. T., Hughes, E. M., &Dobolyi, D. G. (2015). The scientific Status of learning styles theories. Teaching of Psychology, 42(3), 266-271.
23. Wilson, G. B. (2014). Using Oral Presentations to Improve Students’ English Language Skills. Humanities Review, Vol.19, pp.119-210.
24. Yazon, A., Briones, M., &Callo, E. (2021). Correlational Study on the Contextual Factors Influencing The Effectiveness of Flexible Learning: The Case of One State University in the Philippines. International Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship, Social Science and              Humanities (IJMESH), 2(4), 146-15.