Family Structure: A Perspective of Classroom Advisers


Authors : Ritchell C. Alcantara

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 5 - May

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/ybvtaev7

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/2fywssuk

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24MAY1686

Abstract : This study explored the perspectives of classroom teachers on their students' behavior and family structures. Using qualitative phenomenological approach, I purposively engaged in the in-depth interview 14 class advisers of Antonio O. Floirendo Elementary School II. The data which I had recorded during the interview were transcribed, clustered according to themes, presented in matrices, and discussed in response to the objectives of investigation. The results revealed that as to the perspectives of the classroom advisers on the family structure of their students which they perceive to have impacted or affected their classroom behavior, both nuclear and non-nuclear family structures have some positive and negative effects on their students’ classroom behavior. As to the coping mechanism to address the negative effects of family structures on their students’ classroom behaviors, the advisers have used some systems such as, building relationships and communication, establishing classroom rules, encouraging positive behavior and positive classroom climate, and flexibility. As regards the educational management, I have seen from the perspectives of the advisers the vitality of parental involvement, open communication, provision of sense of belongingness, conduct of regular conferences on peer mentoring programs or counseling services to students, parents/ guardians and teachers, provision of resources and support for disadvantaged students and their families through partnership with school communities and local government units.

Keywords : Educational Management, Family Structure, Phenomenology.

References :

  1. Abalos, J.B. (2017). Divorce and separation in the Philippines: Trends and correlates. Demographic Research 36 (50): 1515-1548. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.
  2. Amalu, M.N. (2017). Family environment and self-esteem as predictors of psychological adjustment of secondary school students from divorced homes in Cross River State. IOSR Journal of Research and Methods in Education, 7(6), 9-6.
  3. Amalu, M.N. & Bassey, F.U. (2022). Family Size, Family Structure and Deviant Behaviour among Undergraduates in Public Universities in Cross River State, Nigeria. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL BENCHMARK (IJEB), eISSN: 2489-0170 pISSN:2489-4162 University of Uyo.
  4. Amato, P. R. (2013). Children’s adjustment to divorce: Theories, hypotheses, and empirical support. Journal of Marriage and Family, 55(1), 23-38.
  5. Amato, P. R. (2010). Research on divorce: Continuing trends and new developments. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 650-666.
  6. Appleburry, G. (2021). Definition of a Nuclear Family: Understanding the Characteristics. Love to Know. https://family.lovetoknow.com/definition-nuclear-family.
  7. Arnilla, A.A. (2017). Involvement of Grandmothers in Caring for Children with Autism in the Philippines: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. 5. 151-162.
  8. Austin, V., Shah, S., & Muncer, S. (2005). Teacher stress and coping strategies used to reduce stress. Occupational Therapy International, 12(2), 63–80.
  9. Baca Zinn, M., & Wells, B. (2000). Diversity within Latino families: New lessons for family social science. In D. H. Demo, K. R. Allen, & M. A. Fine (Eds.), Handbook of family diversity (pp. 252–273). Oxford University Press.
  10. Bearman, P .S., & Bruckner, H. (2001). Promising the future: Virginity pledges and first intercourse. American Journal of Sociology, 4, 859-912.
  11. Berger, L. M., & Langton, C. E. (2011). Young disadvantaged men as fathers. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 635(1), 56-75.
  12. Berk, L. (2000). Child Development (5th Edition). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  13. Berryman, K., Power, R., Hollitt, S. (2016). Parenting Styles. Retrieved 2 May 2016.
  14. Billings, W. (2019). Family background and students learning outcomes in schools. Nairobi: McKini press.
  15. Blessing, M. (2019). Types of Family Structures. Love to Know. https://family.lovetoknow.com/about-family-values/types-family-structures.
  16. Brotherson, Sean & Saxena, Divya & Query, Sharon. (2013). School Readiness and Gearing Up for Kindergarten Parental Learning and School Readiness in the Gearing Up for Kindergarten Program. Journal of Human Sciences and Extension. 1. 10.54718/DQEJ8425.
  17. Brown, S.L. (2004). “Family Structure and Child Well-Being: The Significance of Parental Cohabitation,” Journal of Marriage and the Family 66, no. 2: 362.
  18. Cavanagh, S. & Huston, A. (2006). Family Instability and Children's Early Problem Behavior. Social Forces. 85. 551-581. 10.1353/sof.2006.0120.
  19. Cross, C.J. (2018) Extended family households among children in the United States: Differences by race/ethnicity and socio-economic status, Population Studies, 72:2, 235-251, DOI: 10.1080/00324728.2018.1468476.
  20. Cruz, G.T., Cruz, C.J.P. & Saito, Y. (2019), Ageing and Health in the Philippines. Jakarta: Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA). https://www.eria.org/uploads/media/Books/2019-Dec-ERIA-Ageing-And-Health-In-The-Philippines.pdf.
  21. Dawson, G. (2016). Journal of child psychology and psychiatry.
  22. De Jesus, M. D., & Medina, N. C. (2017). Long-distance migration and family dynamics: The case of Filipino migrant workers. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 50(2), 101-119.
  23. Desforges, C., & Abouchaar, A. (2003). The impact of parental involvement, parental support and family education on pupil achievements and adjustment: A literature review. London: Department for Education and Skills.
  24. Epstein, J.L., & Sheldon, S.B. (2002). Present and accounted for: Improving student attendance through family and community involvement. Journal of Educational Research, 95(5), 308-318.
  25. Fan, X., & Chen, M. (2001). Parental involvement and students' academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 1-22.
  26. Felisilda, M.M.A. & Torreon, L.C. (2020). EFFECTS OF BROKEN FAMILY ON PUPILS’ BEHAVIORAL DEVELOPMENT AND ACADEMIC SUCCESS. International Journal of Research-GRANTHAALAYAH, 8(10), 216-223. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v8.i10.2020.1526.
  27. Fomby, P. & Cherlin, A.J. (2007). “Family Instability and Child Well-Being.” American Sociological Review 72:181–204.
  28. Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148-162.
  29. Garcia, A.S. & de Guzman, M.R.T. (2020). The meanings and ways of parental involvement among low-income Filipinos, Early Childhood Research Quarterly, Volume 53, 2020, Pages 343-354, ISSN 0885-2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.05.013.
  30. Gould, J. W., Fisher, N. B., & Bikel, D. (2013). How children experience the blended family. Family Advocate, 36(1), 4-7.
  31. Hadfield, K., Amos, M., Ungar, M., Gosselin, J. & Ganong, L.H. (2018). Do Changes to Family Structure Affect Child and Family Outcomes? A Systematic Review of the Instability Hypothesis. Journal of Family Theory & Review. 10. 10.1111/jftr.12243.
  32. Halpern-Meekin, S. & Tach, L. (2008). “Heterogenity in Two-Parent Families and Adolescent Well-Being,” Journal of Marriage and the Family 70, no. 2: 445.
  33. Hammond, R. & Cheney, P. (n.d.). Intimate Relationships and Families. Creative Commons, pages 5-11.
  34. Hammond, R., Cheney, P. & Pearsey, R. (2015). Introduction to Sociology Textbook. Retrieved from http://www.freesociologybooks.com.
  35. Ham, B.D. (2003). “The Effects of Divorce on the Academic Achievement of High School Seniors,” Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 38, no. 3: 180.
  36. Henderson, A. T., & Mapp, K. L. (2002). A new wave of evidence: The impact of school, family, and community connections on student achievement. Austin, TX: National Center for Family & Community Connections with Schools, Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
  37. Hill, N. E., & Torres, K. (2010). Negotiating the American dream: The paradox of aspirations and achievement among Latino students and engagement between their families and schools. Journal of Social Issues, 66(1), 95-112.
  38. Hofferth, S. L. (2006). Residential father family type and child well-being: Investment versus selection. Demography, 43(1), 53-77.
  39. Hofferth, S. L., & Anderson, K. G. (2003). Are all dads equal? Biology versus marriage as a basis for paternal investment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(1), 213-232.
  40. Lansford, J. E., Ceballo, R., Abbey, A., & Stewart, A. J. (2001). Does family structure matter? A comparison of adoptive, two-parent biological, single-mother, stepfather, and stepmother households. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(3), 840–851.
  41. Jaffee, S.R., Moffitt, T.E., Caspi, A. & Taylor, A. (2003). Life With (or Without) Father: The Benefits of Living With Two Biological Parents Depend on the Father's Antisocial Behavior. Child development. 74. 109-26. 10.1111/1467-8624.t01-1-00524.
  42. Jamaludin, N., Ibrahim, R.Z.A.R. & Mohd Dagang, M. (2018). Social support as a moderator of the relationship between work family conflict and family satisfaction. Management Science Letters. 8. 951-962. 10.5267/j.msl.2018.6.013.
  43. Jeynes, W. H. (2011). Parental involvement and academic success. New York: Routledge.
  44. Johnson, B. & Ray, W. (2016). Family Systems Theory. 10.1002/9781119085621.wbefs130.
  45. Juby, H., Bourdais, C., and Gratton, N. (2001. A Step Further: parenthood in blendedfamilies. Statistics Canada: Report on the Demographic Situation in Canada. Retrieved on August 03, 2017 at http://goo.gl/8CQB3z.
  46. Kaufman, R., & Zigler, E. (1987). Do abused children become abusive parents? American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 57(2), 186-192.
  47. Kessler, D. (2013). Patterns of family interaction and children’s behavioural outcomes. Johannesburg: Victory press.
  48. King, V., Boyd, L. M., & Thorsen, M. L. (2015). Adolescents' perceptions of family belonging instepfamilies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 77(3), 761-774. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12181.
  49. Lansford, J. E., Ceballo, R., Abbey, A., & Stewart, A. J. (2010). Does family structure matter? A comparison of adoptive, two-parent biological, single-mother, stepfather, and stepmother households. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 612-629.
  50. Lee, K. H., & Cho, E. H. (2018). Long-distance family structure: A critical review and future directions. Journal of Family Studies, 24(3), 255-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2018.1505974.
  51. Lewis, R., Romi, S., Ramon, L., & Salkovsky,. (2014). Classroom management and teachers' coping strategies. Prospects.
  52. Lotha, G., Pauls, E.P., & Setia, V. (2008). Nuclear family. Retrieved October 28, 2015 from https://www.britannica.com/topic/nuclear-family.
  53. Lowney, K.S. (2021). Chapter 2. Understanding Theory. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://us.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upmssets/110503_book_item_110503.pdf.
  54. Maag, J.W. (2001). Rewarded by punishment: Reflections on the disuse of positive reinforcement in schools. Exceptional Children, 67(2), 173-186.
  55. Marks, L. D., Lambert, S. F., & Choi, H. (2002). Transitions to adulthood in a family context. Journal of Family Psychology, 16(2), 213-222.
  56. McLanahan, S., & Sandefur, G. (2014). Growing up with a single parent: What hurts, what helps. Harvard University Press.
  57. McMahon, S. D., Wernsman, J., & Rose, D. S. (2009). The relation of parent and peer attachment to academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(4), 394-406.
  58. Mearns, J., & Cain, J. E. (2003). Relationship between teacher’s occupational stress and their burnout and distress: Roles of coping and negative mood regulation expectations. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 16(1), 71–82.
  59. Muthoni, K. L. (2013).  Relationship between family background and academic performance of Secondary School students. Retrieved October 24, 2017 from file:///F:/all%20files/research%20(Qualitative)/Kamau_Academic%20performance.pdf.
  60. Njoreh, M., & Kirori, G. (2018). Blended family dynamics and academic performance outcome of the child in Kenya: Case of Kabete Sub-County in Kiambu County. Journal of Culture and Society, 41. https://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JCSD/article/viewFile/42821 /44115.
  61. Ndung’u, J. (2012). The role of family structure and parenting on the academic performance of teenage children: the case of embakasi constituency of nairobi county. University of Nairobi, Department of Sociology and Social Work.
  62. Naboth, H.A.N. & Ikpah, G.U. (2020). Influence of family structure on the incidence of juvenile delinquency among public senior secondary schools students in Rivers State. International Journal of Innovative Psychology & Social Development. 8 (4):84-94.
  63. Ogbu, C. & Akintoye, E.O. (2018). Influence of family structure on juvenile delinquency: A survey of some Selected Secondary Schools in Benin Metropolis. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 442(2) 178-195.
  64. Olaitan, A. W. (2017). Impact of family structure on the academic performance of Secondary School students in Yewa Local Government Area of Ogun State, Nigeria. Retrieved October 24, 2017 from www.eajournals.org.
  65. Oropesa, R. S., & Landale, N. S. (2004). The future of marriage and Hispanics. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(4), 901–920. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00061.x.
  66. Papernow, P. L. (2017). Blended family. In J. Lebow, A. Chambers & D. Breunlin (Eds.), Encyclopedia of couple and family therapy. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15877-8_471-1.
  67. Pasley, K. & Petren, R.E. (2015). Family Structure. Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119085621.wbefs016.
  68. Perry, S. J. (2009). Personal and counter production work behavior using conservation of resource theory to narrow the profile of deviant employees. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 84(1), 58-77.
  69. Pew Research Center. (2020). The American Family Today. Retrieved from https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2020/09/24/the-american-family-today/.
  70. Pilkauskas, N.V. (2012). Three-Generation Family Households: Differences by Family Structure at Birth. Journal of Marriage and Family. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.01008.x.
  71. Pollard, R. & Boyd, N. (2021). What Is Family Systems Theory?. https://study.com/academy/topic/the-sociocultural-model-of-abnormal-behavior-help-and-review.html.
  72. Rajesh, C., Ashok, L., Rao, C.R., Kamath, V.G., Kamath, A., Sekaran, V.C., Devaramane, V. & Swamy, V.T. (2022). Psychological well-being and coping strategies among secondary school teachers: A cross-sectional study. J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Jun 11;11:152. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1248_21. PMID: 35847148; PMCID: PMC9277760.
  73. Reardon, S. F. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In G. J. Duncan & R. J. Murnane (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children's life chances (pp. 91-116). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  74. Richards. M. H. (2007). Risk and protective factors for urban African – American                 Youth.    USA:      American Journal of Community Psychology.
  75. Robinson, L., Smith, M., M.A., & Segal, R., M.A. (2020, September). Stress Management. Retrieved from https://www.helpguide.org/articles/stress/stress-management.htm.
  76. Roorda, D.L., Koomen, H.M.Y., Spilt, J.L., & Oort, F.J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students' school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493-529.
  77. Ryan, R. M., & Claessens, A. (2013). Associations between family structure changes and children’s behavior problems: The moderating effects of timing and marital birth. Developmental Psychology, 49(7), 1219–1231. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029397.
  78. Ryan R.M., Claessens A., & Markowitz A.J. (2015). Associations between family structure change and child behavior problems: the moderating effect of family income. Child Dev. 86:112–27.
  79. Ryan, J.B., & Cooper, T. (2012). The challenges teachers face when teaching children from economically disadvantaged backgrounds: A review of the literature. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16(6), 597-616.
  80. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
  81. Sandstrom, H. & Huerta, S. (2013). The Negative Effects of Instability on Child Development: A Research Synthesis Low-Income Working Families Discussion Paper 3.
  82. Sarkisian, N., Gerena, M., & Gerstel, N. (2006). Extended Family Ties Among Mexicans, Puerto Ricans, and Whites: Superintegration or Disintegration? Family Relations: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 55(3), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2006.00408.x.
  83. Schaffer, H. R. (1996). Social Development. Oxford: Blackwell Press.
  84. Schultz, W. (2006). Behavioral theories and the neurophysiology of reward. Ann Rev Psychol 57: 87-115. Annual review of psychology. 57. 87-115. 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070229.
  85. Scroope, C. (2017). Family. Cultural Atlas. https://culturalatlas.sbs.com.au/filipino-culture/filipino-culture-family.
  86. Simpson, I. H. (2008). "Family". Microsoft® Student 2009 [DVD]. Redmond, WA: Microsoft             Corporation.
  87. Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. Sage Publications.
  88. Stack R.J., & Meredith A. (2018). The Impact of Financial Hardship on Single Parents: An Exploration of the Journey From Social Distress to Seeking Help. J Fam Econ Issues. 2018;39(2):233-242. doi: 10.1007/s10834-017-9551-6. Epub 2017 Oct 17. PMID: 29755247; PMCID: PMC5932102.
  89. Sternberg, R. J. & Williams, W. M. (2002). Educational psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Inc.
  90. Stone, A. (2012). Changing patterns in family structure: The plight of children in Nigerian schools: Ibadan: Macmillan publishers.
  91. Strong Bonds. (n.d.). Understanding Families. Jesuit Social Services. http://www.strongbonds.jss.org.au/workers/families/dynamics.html.
  92. Şüheda, Ö. (2010). Teachers’ strategies to cope with student misbehavior, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 2, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 587-594. ISSN 1877-0428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.068.
  93. UP Population Institute (2014). The Filipino family and youth in transition: policy andprogram directions. Paper presented in the 2014 PCPD Partners’ Conference, AIM Conference Center October 23, 2014. Retrieved August 01, 2017 from http://goo.gl/rs5qqW.
  94. U.S. Census Bureau. (2021). Table FG2. Family Groups: 2020. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/families/family-g-2020.html.
  95. Thapa, A., Cohen, J., Guffey, S., & Higgins-D'Alessandro, A. (2013). A review of school climate research. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 357-385.
  96. The Step Family Foundation. (2018). The Dynamics Of The Step Family. https://www.stepfamily.org/blog/the-dynamics-of-the-step-family.
  97. Thompson, R. A. (2017).  Twenty-first century attachment theory.  In H. Keller & K. A. Bard (Eds.), The cultural nature of attachment: Contextualizing relationships and development. Strüngmann Forum Reports, Vol. 22 (pp. 301-319).  Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  98. Wallerstein, J. S., Lewis, J. M. and Blakeslee, S. (2002). The unexpected legacy of divorce: A              25 – year land mark study. NY: Hyperion.
  99. Wentzel, K. R. (2016). Socialization in school contexts: Salient research trends and future directions. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 26(1), 181-196.
  100. World Vision. (n.d.). Coping from the pains of a broken family. https://www.worldvision.org.ph/stories/coping-from-the-pains-of-a-broken-family-2/.

This study explored the perspectives of classroom teachers on their students' behavior and family structures. Using qualitative phenomenological approach, I purposively engaged in the in-depth interview 14 class advisers of Antonio O. Floirendo Elementary School II. The data which I had recorded during the interview were transcribed, clustered according to themes, presented in matrices, and discussed in response to the objectives of investigation. The results revealed that as to the perspectives of the classroom advisers on the family structure of their students which they perceive to have impacted or affected their classroom behavior, both nuclear and non-nuclear family structures have some positive and negative effects on their students’ classroom behavior. As to the coping mechanism to address the negative effects of family structures on their students’ classroom behaviors, the advisers have used some systems such as, building relationships and communication, establishing classroom rules, encouraging positive behavior and positive classroom climate, and flexibility. As regards the educational management, I have seen from the perspectives of the advisers the vitality of parental involvement, open communication, provision of sense of belongingness, conduct of regular conferences on peer mentoring programs or counseling services to students, parents/ guardians and teachers, provision of resources and support for disadvantaged students and their families through partnership with school communities and local government units.

Keywords : Educational Management, Family Structure, Phenomenology.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe