⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



FedSCORE-PP: A Federated and PrivacyPreserving Machine Learning Framework for Collaborative Supply Chain Risk Prediction Across Organizations


Authors : Sohail Sayed; Nauman Sayed

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 8 - August


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2kdt75km

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26aug1100

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : Global supply chains are increasingly exposed to disruptions whose effects propagate across organizational boundaries, yet the data needed to predict such risks is fragmented among firms reluctant to share it for competitive, contractual, and regulatory reasons. Centralized machine learning therefore under-utilizes collective evidence, and organizations with inadequate datasets cannot predict risk reliably on their own [1].

Keywords : Federated Learning, Differential Privacy, Homomorphic Encryption, Secure Aggregation, Supply Chain Risk Management, Supply Chain Resilience, Collaborative AI.

References :

  1. Z. Ge, L. Kong, and A. Brintrup, “Federated machine learning for privacy preserving, collective supply chain risk prediction,”  International Journal of Production Research , vol. 61, no. 23, pp. 8115–8132, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1080/00207543.2022.2164628.
  2. Y. Pan, H. Wang, C. Zheng, J. Yang, and L. Wang, “Efficient Federated Learning Aggregation Protocol Using Approximate Homomorphic Encryption,” pp. 1884–1889, May 2023, doi: 10.1109/cscwd57460.2023.10152829.
  3. Q. Meng, “Privacy-preserving predictive maintenance method for cross-border unmanned logistics system integrating federated learning and blockchain,”  Discover Applied Sciences , vol. 8, no. 1, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s42452-025-07980-5.
  4. X. Liang, “Cross-border logistics risk warning system based on federated learning,”  Scientific Reports , vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 39131–39131, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-25507-1.
  5. A. Sattar, M. Bukhari, Z. U. Rehman, S. Khalid, Y. Lee, and S. Rho, “A data analytics-driven approach to backorder prediction using federated machine learning in industrial supply chains,”  Scientific Reports , vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 4560–4560, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-34578-z.
  6. W. Ma, L. Huang, Q. Zhang, Y. Wang, X. Zhang, and R. Song, “Federated Split Learning with Large Language Models Integration: A Study on Potential Container Source Identification in Sea-Rail Intermodal Transport,”  International Journal of Computers Communications & Control , vol. 21, no. 3, May 2026, doi: 10.15837/ijccc.2026.3.7263.
  7. D. Teng and V. Martinez, “Federated Diversity and Inclusion-focused NLP-based Supply Chain Risk Prediction System Design,”  Academy of Management Proceedings , vol. 2023, no. 1, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.5465/amproc.2023.11312abstract.
  8. B. Deb and T. R. Dilip, “Impact of AI-Based Risk Management and Supply Chain Resilience,” 2026, pp. 232–246. doi: 10.62823/mgm/2026/9789349468795/21.
  9. A. Atadoga, F. Osasona, O. O. Amoo, O. A. Farayola, B. S. Ayinla, and T. O. Abrahams, “THE ROLE OF IT IN ENHANCING SUPPLY CHAIN RESILIENCE: A GLOBAL REVIEW,”  International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research , vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 336–351, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.51594/ijmer.v6i2.774.
  10. G. Baryannis, S. Validi, S. Dani, and G. Antoniou, “Supply chain risk management and artificial intelligence: state of the art and future research directions,”  Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield) , vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 2179–2202, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1080/00207543.2018.1530476.
  11. Mr. I. K. Baidoo, Mr. I. D. Essien, Dr. A. O. Soge, Mr. R. N. Kachungu, and Ir. D. Rahadian, “Artificial Intelligence and Risk Reduction in Supply Chain Management,”  International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied Science , vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 461–474, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.51583/ijltemas.2026.15020000041.
  12. A. Brintrup  et al. , “Supply chain data analytics for predicting supplier disruptions: a case study in complex asset manufacturing,”  International Journal of Production Research , vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 3330–3341, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1080/00207543.2019.1685705.
  13. N. Rezki and M. Mansouri, “Machine Learning for Proactive Supply Chain Risk Management: Predicting Delays and Enhancing Operational Efficiency,”  Management Systems in Production Engineering , vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 345–356, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.2478/mspe-2024-0033.
  14. H. C. W. Lau, Y. P. Tsang, D. Nakandala, and C. K. M. Lee, “Risk quantification in cold chain management: a federated learning-enabled multi-criteria decision-making methodology,”  Industrial Management & Data Systems , vol. 121, no. 7, pp. 1684–1703, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1108/imds-04-2020-0199.
  15. M. Aledhari, R. Razzak, R. M. Parizi, and F. Saeed, “Federated Learning: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Protocols, and Applications,”  IEEE Access , vol. 8, pp. 140699–140725, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1109/access.2020.3013541.
  16. T. T. Nguyen  et al. , “Federated Learning-Based Framework: A New Paradigm Proposed for Supply Chain Risk Management,” pp. 5–5, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.3390/engproc2025097005.
  17. B. Zhang, W. J. Tan, W. Cai, and A. N. Zhang, “Forecasting with Visibility Using Privacy Preserving Federated Learning,” in  2022 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC) , Dec. 2022, pp. 2687–2698. doi: 10.1109/wsc57314.2022.10015277.
  18. B. Liu, M. Ding, S. Shaham, W. Rahayu, F. Farokhi, and Z. Lin, “When Machine Learning Meets Privacy,”  Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) , vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 1–36, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1145/3436755.
  19. A. K. S. and A. A., “Federated Learning: A Privacy Preserving Approach for Decentralized Machine Learning,”  International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) , pp. 580–580, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.38124/ijisrt/26mar171.
  20. K. Wei  et al. , “Federated Learning With Differential Privacy: Algorithms and Performance Analysis,”  Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) , vol. 15, pp. 3454–3469, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1109/tifs.2020.2988575.
  21. H. Fang and Q. Qian, “Privacy Preserving Machine Learning with Homomorphic Encryption and Federated Learning,”  Future Internet , vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 94–94, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.3390/fi13040094.
  22. A. Qammar, A. Karim, H. Ning, and J. Ding, “Securing federated learning with blockchain: a systematic literature review,”  Artificial Intelligence Review , vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 3951–3985, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10462-022-10271-9.
  23. K. Wei  et al. , “Personalized Federated Learning With Differential Privacy and Convergence Guarantee,”  IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security , vol. 18, pp. 4488–4503, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1109/tifs.2023.3293417.
  24. W. Jin, Y. Yao, S. Han, N. Liubov, and C. Joe‐Wong, “FedML-HE: An Efficient Homomorphic-Encryption-Based Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning System,” Mar. 20, 2023,  Cornell University . doi: 10.48550/arxiv.2303.10837.
  25. C. Zhang, S. Li, J. Xia, W. Wang, F. Yan, and Y. Liu, “BatchCrypt: Efficient homomorphic encryption for cross-silo federated learning,”  Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) , pp. 493–506, Jan. 2020, Accessed: Nov. 2025. [Online]. Available:  http://repository.hkust.edu.hk/ir/Record/1783.1-105781
  26. G. Baryannis, S. Dani, and G. Antoniou, “Predicting supply chain risks using machine learning: The trade-off between performance and interpretability,”  Future Generation Computer Systems , vol. 101, pp. 993–1004, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.future.2019.07.059.
  27. M. Riad, M. Naïmi, and C. Okar, “Enhancing Supply Chain Resilience Through Artificial Intelligence: Developing a Comprehensive Conceptual Framework for AI Implementation and Supply Chain Optimization,”  Logistics , vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 111–111, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.3390/logistics8040111.
  28. L. Li, Y. Fan, Y. K. Tse, and K. Lin, “A review of applications in federated learning,”  Computers & Industrial Engineering , vol. 149, pp. 106854–106854, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106854.
  29. F. Liu, Z. Zheng, Y. Shi, Y. Tong, and Y. Zhang, “A survey on federated learning: a perspective from multi-party computation,”  Frontiers of Computer Science , vol. 18, no. 1, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11704-023-3282-7.
  30. J. Ma, S. Naas, S. Sigg, and X. Lyu, “Privacy‐preserving federated learning based on multi‐key homomorphic encryption,”  International Journal of Intelligent Systems , vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 5880–5901, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1002/int.22818.
  31. A. Korkmaz and P. Rao, “Fast and Secure Selective Homomorphic Encryption for Federated Learning,” Jan. 09, 2026,  Cornell University . doi: 10.1109/ccnc65079.2026.11366371.
  32. N. N. Ahamed and P. Karthikeyan, “FLBlock: A Sustainable Food Supply Chain Approach Through Federated Learning and Blockchain,”  Procedia Computer Science , vol. 235, pp. 3065–3074, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2024.04.290.
  33. M. Kumar and S. Bhatt, “Blockchain-Driven Federated Learning Based Differential Privacy in Decentralized Supply Chain,” pp. 1291–1294, May 2025, doi: 10.1109/netcrypt65877.2025.11102516.
  34. C. Bisaria, A. Almoshawah, A. Avasthi, T. Satish, S. G, and S. V, “Developing Privacy-Preserving Mechanisms for Secure Data Exchange in Decentralized Supply Chain Management Platforms,” pp. 1–6, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.1109/giest66547.2025.11387080.
  35. K. Wei  et al. , “User-Level Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning: Analysis and Performance Optimization,”  IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing , vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 3388–3401, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1109/tmc.2021.3056991.
  36. S. K. Mucherla, “Predicting Vendor and Supply Chain Disruptions Using AI and Machine Learning in ERP Sourcing and Procurement for Optimized Business Processes,”  Journal of Physico-Chemical Material , pp. 15–21, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.64820/aepjpcm.21.15.21.62025.
  37. X. Yuan, W. Ni, M. Ding, K. Wei, J. Li, and H. V. Poor, “Amplitude-Varying Perturbation for Balancing Privacy and Utility in Federated Learning,”  IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security , vol. 18, pp. 1884–1897, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1109/tifs.2023.3258255.
  38. K. Ranaweera  et al. , “Federated Learning with Differential Privacy: An Utility-Enhanced Approach,” Mar. 27, 2025. doi: 10.48550/arxiv.2503.21154.
  39. S. Weng, L. Zhang, X. Zhang, and M. A. Imran, “Faster Convergence on Differential Privacy-Based Federated Learning,”  IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 22578–22589, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1109/jiot.2024.3383226.
  40. S. Saifullah, D. Mercier, A. Lucieri, A. Dengel, and S. Ahmed, “The privacy-explainability trade-off: unraveling the impacts of differential privacy and federated learning on attribution methods,”  Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence , vol. 7, pp. 1236947–1236947, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1236947.

Global supply chains are increasingly exposed to disruptions whose effects propagate across organizational boundaries, yet the data needed to predict such risks is fragmented among firms reluctant to share it for competitive, contractual, and regulatory reasons. Centralized machine learning therefore under-utilizes collective evidence, and organizations with inadequate datasets cannot predict risk reliably on their own [1].

Keywords : Federated Learning, Differential Privacy, Homomorphic Encryption, Secure Aggregation, Supply Chain Risk Management, Supply Chain Resilience, Collaborative AI.

Paper Submission Last Date
30 - September - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe