Authors : Bhupesh Mani Tripathi

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 6 - June

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/yt8nct98

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25jun1143

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : Background: Patriarchy as a system of male dominance has historically marginalized women and gender minorities across legal, economic, and cultural domains. Feminist movements emerged as powerful counter-forces challenging these hierarchical structures through various waves of activism and theoretical development. The relationship between feminism and patriarchy remains complex and multidimensional, requiring critical examination of both transformative successes and persistent challenges in contemporary society.  Objective: This study critically examines the effects of feminism on patriarchal systems, analyzing how feminist movements have challenged and transformed traditional power structures while confronting ongoing resistance and backlash across different cultural and institutional contexts.  Methods: A comprehensive theoretical analysis was conducted examining feminist literature, historical developments, and contemporary scholarship on gender relations. The study employs intersectional feminist theory to analyze legal, cultural, and institutional transformations, drawing from multiple waves of feminist thought and global perspectives on patriarchal resistance.  Results: Feminist movements have achieved significant legal victories including suffrage rights, reproductive freedom, and anti- discrimination legislation. Cultural transformations include challenging traditional gender roles, introducing concepts of gender as socially constructed, and increasing awareness of gender-based violence. However, patriarchal systems demonstrate resilience through institutional backlash, anti-feminist movements, and neoliberal co-optation. Intersectional analysis reveals that progress varies significantly across race, class, and cultural contexts, with marginalized women facing compounded forms of oppression.  Conclusions: Feminism has significantly transformed patriarchal systems through legal reforms, cultural shifts, and institutional changes, yet patriarchy demonstrates remarkable resilience and adaptability. The relationship remains dynamic and contested, with feminist achievements coexisting alongside persistent inequalities and emerging forms of resistance. Intersectional approaches are essential for understanding diverse experiences of oppression and developing inclusive strategies for continued gender equality advocacy.

Keywords : Feminism, Patriarchy, Gender Equality, Intersectionality, Social Transformation, Women's Rights, Gender Theory.

References :

1. Ashraf, F., & Jepsen, D. (2024). Private patriarchy's impact on women's careers: Through kaleidoscope career model lens. Gender, Work & Organization, 31(3), 892-912. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011241227263
2. Beauvoir, S. de. (1949). The second sex. Knopf.
3. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
4. Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Routledge.
5. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139-167.
6. Davis, A. Y. (1981). Women, race, and class. Random House.
7. Davis, L. (2023). Patriarchy, development, and the divergence of gender equality. Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4528467
8. Fotaki, M., & Pullen, A. (2024). Feminist theories and activist practices in organization studies. Organization Studies, 45(2), 203-223. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406231209861
9. Fraser, N. (2013). Fortunes of feminism: From state-managed capitalism to neoliberal crisis. Verso Books.
10. Friedan, B. (1963). The feminine mystique. Norton.
11. hooks, b. (2000). Feminism is for everybody: Passionate politics. South End Press.
12. Johnston, M., & Meger, S. (2024). Morbid symptoms: A feminist dialectics of global patriarchy in crisis. Security Dialogue, 55(6), 1256-1274. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661241295658
13. Liu, Y. (2024). Virtues or talent among brotherless daughters: A study of how patriarchal gender ideals affect gender role attitudes among women from the one-child generation in China. Sociology, 58(2), 412-430. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385231160033
14. Lorde, A. (1984). Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. Crossing Press.
15. MacKinnon, C. A. (1989). Toward a feminist theory of the state. Harvard University Press.
16. Mohanty, C. T. (2003). Feminism without borders: Decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity. Duke University Press.
17. Rich, A. (1980). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 5(4), 631-660.
18. Rosenkranz, B. (2024). Intersectionality and feminist movements from a global perspective. Sociology Compass, 18(3), e13211. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13211
19. Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271-313). University of Illinois Press.
20. United Nations. (2024). Commission on the Status of Women opens 2024 session. https://press.un.org/en/2024/wom2231.doc.htm
21. UN Women. (2020). Intersectional feminism: What it means and why it matters right now. https://www.unwomen.org/en/news/stories/2020/6/explainer-intersectional-feminism-what-it-means-and-why-it-matters
22. Walby, S. (1989). Theorising patriarchy. Blackwell Publishers.
23. Walby, S. (2020). The future of feminism. Polity Press.