Authors :
S. M. T. D. Samarakoon; R. L. Dangalla
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 2 - February
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/3ytrspjz
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/ycx2s3hw
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26feb300
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Agile project management, focusing on flexibility and iterative delivery, has a tendency to view issue resolution
timing as vague and thus has a tendency to result in schedule overruns and resource planning inefficiency. This research
contributes a large-scale statistical approach to predicting issue resolution patterns from historical JIRA data, providing
quantitative analysis to the project managers to enhance sprint planning and resource allocation. It utilizes time-series
analysis with a broad dataset of 1,095 days of issue tracking record sourced from a publicly available Kaggle dataset, being
actual software development projects. It uses an Auto Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) model that
effectively tests various setups of parameters using stringent statistical tests. The optimal ARIMA (1,1,1) model
demonstrated strong forecasting capability, as indicated by the performance metrics: AIC (Akaike Information Criterion)
= 1872.52, BIC (Bayesian Information Criterion) = 1887.07, & extremely low error metrics (Mean Absolute Error =
0.0006525, Root mean squared Error = 3.2501). The results validate the efficiency of the model for forecasting issues resolved
per day and establishing patterns over time in team productivity. This research provides robust variations in resolution rate
prediction across development cycle stages, with high performance in stable sprints. The model output shows good
estimation of team capacity for data-driven sprint backlogs and deadline realignment. This research adds a practical,
scalable approach for JIRA-using teams, bridging the gap between Agile principles and data science.
Keywords :
Agile Project Management, Issue Resolution Forecasting, JIRA, ARIMA Modeling, Sprint Backlog.
References :
- K. Schwaber and J. Sutherland, “The Scrum Guide,” Scrum Alliance, 2017.
- T. Dingsøyr, S. Nerur, V. Balijepally, and N. B. Moe, “A decade of agile methodologies: Towards explaining agile software development,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 1213–1221, 2012.
- M. Usman, M. Shahbaz, and I. Kureshi, “A risk management framework for agile software development,” Int. J. Agile Syst. Manag., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 102–118, 2016.
- S. Hayat, Z. Anwar, and M. Anwar, “Machine learning for agile software development: A review,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Emerging Trends Smart Technol. (ICETST), pp. 1–6, 2021.
- R. J. Hyndman and G. Athanasopoulos, “Forecasting: principles and practice,” OTexts, 2018.
- G. Box, G. M. Jenkins, and G. C. Reinsel, Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, 5th ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2015.
- F. Malhotra and M. Jain, “AI-enabled risk prediction for agile software development,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Cloud Comput., Data Sci. Eng. (Confluence), pp. 448–453, 2021.
- C. Boehm, D. E. Ferreira, and H. Zhang, “Forecasting software project risks using machine learning: A data-driven approach,” J. Syst. Softw., vol. 172, p. 110867, 2021.
- R. Jabangwe, E. Damiani, and M. Höst, “Software project risk forecasting using historical project data,” Empirical Software Engineering, vol. 26, pp. 1–30, 2021.
- M. Cohn, “Agile Estimating and Planning,” Prentice Hall, 2005.
- S. Makridakis et al., “Statistical and Machine Learning Forecasting Methods,” Int. J. Forecasting, vol. 38, no. 1, 2022.
- Atlassian, “JIRA Software Documentation,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
- B. Boehm and R. Turner, “Balancing Agility and Discipline,” Addison-Wesley, 2003.
- D. J. Anderson, “Kanban: Successful Evolutionary Change,” Blue Hole Press, 2010.
- A. Cockburn, “Agile Software Development,” Addison-Wesley, 2001.
- C. Larman and B. Vodde, “Large-Scale Scrum,” Addison-Wesley, 2016.
- R. Krishna, A. Agrawal, A. Rahman, A. Sobran, and T. Menzies, “What is the Connection Between Issues, Bugs, and Enhancements? (Lessons Learned from 800+ Software Projects),” arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.08736, 2017.
- G. E. P. Box, G. M. Jenkins, G. C. Reinsel, and G. M. Ljung, Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, 5th ed., Wiley, 2015.
- H. K. Dam, T. Tran, J. Grundy, A. Ghose, and Y. Kamei, “Towards Effective AI-Powered Agile Project Management,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.10578, 2018.
- S. Siami-Namini, N. Tavakoli, and A. Siami Namin, “A Comparison of ARIMA and LSTM in Forecasting Time Series,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.06386, 2018.
- S. Suddala, “Dynamic Demand Forecasting in Supply Chains Using Hybrid ARIMA-LSTM Architectures,” International Journal of Advanced Research, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1167–1171, 2024.
- A. Atesongun and M. Gulsen, “A Hybrid Forecasting Structure Based on ARIMA and Artificial Neural Network Models,” Applied Sciences, vol. 14, no. 16, p. 7122, 2024.
- K. Kashif and R. Ślepaczuk, “LSTM-ARIMA as a Hybrid Approach in Algorithmic Investment Strategies,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.18206, 2024.
- A. S. Temür, M. Akgün, and G. Temür, “Predicting Housing Sales in Turkey Using ARIMA, LSTM, and Hybrid Models,” Journal of Business Economics and Management, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 920–938, 2019.
- Tavares, J. et al., “Risk Management in Agile Software Development: A Systematic Literature Review,” IEEE Latin America Transactions, vol. 16, no. 4, 2018.
- Stettina, C. J., & Heijstek, W., “Necessary and neglected? An empirical study of internal agile portfolio management practices,” IEEE International Conference on Agile Software Development, 2011.
- De Myttenaere, A., Golden, B., Le Grand, B., & Rossi, F., “Mean Absolute Percentage Error for regression models,” Neurocomputing, vol. 192, pp. 38–48, 2016.
- Mohanani, R. et al., “Decision Making in Agile Software Development: A Focus Group Study of Practitioners,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 45, no. 12, 2017.
- H. El Madany, M. Alfonse, and M. Aref, “Hybrid Time Series Model for Procurement Forecasting in Enterprise Resource and Planning (ERP) System: A Case Study,” Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, vol. 57, no. 1, 2022.
- R. Nichani, L. Gasmi, N. Laiche, and S. Kabou, “Optimizing Financial Time Series Predictions with Hybrid ARIMA, LSTM, and XGBoost Models,” Studies in Engineering and Exact Sciences, vol. 5, no. 2, 2022.
- N. S. M. Ali and F. A. Mohammed, “The Use of ARIMA, LSTM and GRU Models in Time Series Hybridization with Practical Application,” International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1371–1383, 2023.
- X. Wang, Y. Kang, R. J. Hyndman, and F. Li, “Distributed ARIMA Models for Ultra-long Time Series,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.09577, 2020.
- A. S. Temür and G. Temür, “A Hybrid ARIMA-LSTM Model for Short-Term Vehicle Speed Prediction,” Energies, vol. 17, no. 15, p. 3736, 2024.
- M. A. de Oliveira, M. C. de Oliveira, and J. C. de Oliveira, “hLSTM-Aging: A Hybrid LSTM Model for Software Aging Forecast,” Applied Sciences, 2022.
Agile project management, focusing on flexibility and iterative delivery, has a tendency to view issue resolution
timing as vague and thus has a tendency to result in schedule overruns and resource planning inefficiency. This research
contributes a large-scale statistical approach to predicting issue resolution patterns from historical JIRA data, providing
quantitative analysis to the project managers to enhance sprint planning and resource allocation. It utilizes time-series
analysis with a broad dataset of 1,095 days of issue tracking record sourced from a publicly available Kaggle dataset, being
actual software development projects. It uses an Auto Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) model that
effectively tests various setups of parameters using stringent statistical tests. The optimal ARIMA (1,1,1) model
demonstrated strong forecasting capability, as indicated by the performance metrics: AIC (Akaike Information Criterion)
= 1872.52, BIC (Bayesian Information Criterion) = 1887.07, & extremely low error metrics (Mean Absolute Error =
0.0006525, Root mean squared Error = 3.2501). The results validate the efficiency of the model for forecasting issues resolved
per day and establishing patterns over time in team productivity. This research provides robust variations in resolution rate
prediction across development cycle stages, with high performance in stable sprints. The model output shows good
estimation of team capacity for data-driven sprint backlogs and deadline realignment. This research adds a practical,
scalable approach for JIRA-using teams, bridging the gap between Agile principles and data science.
Keywords :
Agile Project Management, Issue Resolution Forecasting, JIRA, ARIMA Modeling, Sprint Backlog.