Authors : Dr. Hassan Boukhris

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 9 - September

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/7zkhxvpn

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26sep002

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : Despite the established role of language learning strategies (LLS) in facilitating learning and fostering learner autonomy, research shows that many university students in an English as a foreign language context exhibit a limited LLS repertoire and demonstrate limited strategic competence. This study investigates LLS instruction to students transitioning from secondary to higher education in Morocco. The qualitative case study examines the curriculum guidelines with regard to LLS instruction, the extent to which the textbook materials align with the guidelines, and LLS instruction implementation in classroom practice. Data was collected through document analysis and observation of lessons taught to a class of finalyear high school students. Findings reveal that, with some limitations, the curriculum provides the rationale for LLS instruction and articulates a comprehensive theory-informed vision recommending explicit and embedded LLS teaching, metacognitive awareness, and strategy transfer to foster learner autonomy. The textbook partially realizes the curriculum vision through explicit Study Skills sections and embedded strategic teaching. Classroom teaching of LLS failed to effectively enact the curriculum guidelines and to leverage the affordances of the textbook. LLS was sidelined in classroom practice due to time constraints and to the baccalaureate examination preparation pressure. The findings highlight the importance of the systematic alignment of curriculum policy, textbook materials, and classroom practice in promoting learner autonomy and LLS competence. The findings also indicate that the LLS deficiency among EFL university students may result from LLS instruction inadequacy at the secondary education level. Incorporating strategic competence assessment in secondary education examinations and emphasizing LLS in educational materials and in teacher pre-service and professional development programs would contribute to better preparing high school students for university study, where autonomous and strategic learning skills are essential for academic success.

Keywords : Language Learning Strategies; Learner Autonomy; Learner Training; Learning To Learn; EFL Learners; Curriculum Policy; Learning Strategy Instruction.

References :

1. Alhaysony, M. (2017). Language learning strategies use by Saudi EFL students: The effect of duration of English language study and gender. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(1), 18-28.
2. Ardasheva, Y., & Tretter, T. R. (2013). Contributions of individual differences and contextual variables to reading achievement of English language learners: An empirical investigation using hierarchical linear modeling. TESOL Quarterly, 47(2), 323-351.
3. Barnard, R., & Phan, N. T. T. (2015). Language learning strategies: Policy, pedagogy and perceptions in Vietnam. In K. Dunworth & G. Zhang (Eds.), Critical perspectives on language education: Australia and the Asia Pacific (pp. 141-162). Springer.
4. Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and researching autonomy (2nd ed.). Routledge.
5. Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. Continuum.
6. Bouziane, A. (2015). Language learning strategies of Moroccan university students of English: Developing strategic competence in an EFL context [Doctoral dissertation, Mohamed V University]. Toubkal Research Repository.
7. Chamot, A. U., & O'Malley, J. M. (1994). The CALLA handbook: Implementing the Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach. Addison-Wesley Longman.
8. Cheng, L. (2005). Changing language teaching through language testing: A washback study. Cambridge University Press.
9. Cohen, A. D., & Macaro, E. (2007). Language learner strategies: Thirty years of research and practice. Oxford University Press.
10. Dabarera, C., Renandya, W. A., & Zhang, L. J. (2014). The impact of metacognitive scaffolding and monitoring on reading comprehension. System, 42, 462-473.
11. Ellis, G. & Sinclair, B. (1989). Learning to Learn. Cambridge University Press.
12. Gao, X. (2006). Understanding changes in Chinese students' uses of learning strategies in China and Britain: A multi-perspective study. System, 34(1), 55-67.
13. Grenfell, M. J., & Harris, V. (1999). Modern languages and learning strategies: In theory and practice. Routledge.
14. Grenfell, M. J., & Harris, V. (2017). Language learner strategies: A bridge to progress? Language Learning Journal, 45(2), 204-216.
15. Griffiths, C. (2013). The strategy factor in successful language learning. Multilingual Matters.
16. Kennedy, M. M. (1999). The role of preservice education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 54-86). Jossey Bass.
17. Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Lightbown, P. M. & Spada, N. (2006). How languages are learned (3^th Ed). Oxford University Press.
19. Macaro, E. (2001). Learning strategies in foreign and second language classrooms: The role of learner strategies. Continuum.
20. Macaro, E. (2006). Strategies for language learning and for language use: Revising the theoretical framework. The Modern Language Journal, 90(3), 320–337.
21. Ministry of National Education, Higher Education, Training of Executives and Scientific Research of Morocco. (2007). English language guidelines for secondary schools: Common core, first year, and second year baccalaureate. https://waliye.men.gov.ma.
22. Nosratinia, M., & Zaker, A. (2017). Scrutinizing the impact of teachers' critical thinking and teaching autonomy on their teaching success and learners' use of language learning strategies. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(1), 122-132.
23. Nunan, D. (2015). Teaching English to speakers of other languages: An introduction (2^nd Ed). Rutledge.
24. O’Malley, J. M. (1994). The cognitive academic language learning approach (CALLA). Longman.
25. O’Malley, J. M. & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
26. O'Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Kupper, L., & Russo, R. P. (1985). Learning strategies used by beginning and intermediate ESL students. Language Learning, 35(1), 21-46.
27. Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: An update. Eric Digest. CAL-Center for Applied Linguistics.
28. Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Newbury House.
29. Oxford, R. L. (2017). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context (2nd ed.). Routledge.
30. Oxford, R., Hollaway, M. E., & Horton-Murillo, D. (1992). Language learning strategies, the communicative approach, and their classroom implications. Foreign Language Annals, 25(1), 29-39.
31. Park, G. P. (2011). Adult English language learners constructing and responding to identity positioning: A qualitative study of Korean immigrants. TESOL Quarterly, 45(3), 415-438.
32. Plonsky, L. (2011). The effectiveness of second language strategy instruction: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 61(4), 993-1038.
33. Rubin, J. (1975). What the “Good language learner” can teach Us. TESOL Quarterly, 9(1), 41-51.
34. Tseng, W. T., Dörnyei, Z., & Schmitt, N. (2006). A new approach to assessing strategic learning: The case of self-regulation in vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 78–102.
35. Vandergrift, L., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2014). Second and foreign language listening: Analysis, comprehension, and measurement. Routledge.
36. Woodrow, L. J. (2005). The challenges of measuring language learning strategies. Foreign Language Annals, 38(1), 90-100.