From Distress to Development: The Role of Institutional Credit in Transforming Rural Economy in India


Authors : Dr. Ramesh Kumar

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 1 - January


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3nmt8rbc

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/4s3df9zb

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jan1633

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : Rural distress remains a persistent challenge in India, driven by climatic shocks, social inequality, small landholdings, and reliance on informal credit. This study examines how institutional credit can help reduce rural hardship and promote inclusive economic growth. Using long-term data from the Reserve Bank of India, NABARD, and government sources, the analysis tracks trends in loans issued and outstanding across cooperatives, scheduled commercial banks (SCBs), and regional rural banks (RRBs) from 1990–91 to 2023-24. It also assesses the adoption of the Kisan Credit Card (KCC) scheme to achieve financial inclusion in India. The results show rapid growth in institutional credit, with SCBs becoming the main lenders, while cooperatives and RRBs have seen their shares decline despite their community presence. Increasing outstanding loans indicate greater dependence on formal credit but also raise concerns about debt levels and repayment capacity. The KCC scheme has reached over 7 crore farmers, although changes in its adoption suggest uneven access and institutional hurdles. The study concludes that expanding credit alone cannot fully solve rural distress. It must be combined with social protection, climate-smart practices, and inclusive policies to support sustainable livelihoods. Strengthening cooperatives and RRBs, along with improving efficiency, is key to creating a balanced rural financial system. This study contributes to the discussion of rural development by linking institutional credit to livelihood security, resilience, and inclusive growth.

Keywords : Rural Distress, Institutional Credit, Livelihood Security, Financial Inclusion, Economic Development, India.

References :

  1. Aleksandrova, M., & Costella, C. (2021). Reaching the poorest and most vulnerable: Addressing loss and damage through social protection. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 50, 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.03.010
  2. Arun, T., & Kamath, R. (2015). Financial inclusion: Policies and practices. IIMB Management Review, 27(4), 267–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2015.09.004
  3. Balasubramanian, P., Ibanez, M., Khan, S., & Sahoo, S. (2024). Does women’s economic empowerment promote human development in low- and middle-income countries? A meta-analysis. World Development, 178, 106588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106588
  4. Berchoux, T., & Hutton, C. W. (2019). Spatial associations between household and community livelihood capital in rural territories: An example from the Mahanadi Delta, India. Applied Geography, 103, 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.01.002
  5. Bergh, A. (2021). Poverty and new welfare economics. In Routledge eBooks (pp. 145–157). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429331312-9
  6. Bhuiyan, M. F., & Ivlevs, A. (2018). Micro-entrepreneurship and subjective well-being: Evidence from rural Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(4), 625–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.09.005
  7. Ceesay, E. K., & Ndiaye, M. B. O. (2022). Climate change, food security, and economic growth nexus in the Gambia: Evidence from an econometric analysis. Research in Globalization, 5, 100089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2022.100089
  8. Chao, K. (2024). Family farming in climate change: Strategies for resilient and sustainable food systems. Heliyon, 10(7), e28599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28599
  9. Chavas, J., Rivieccio, G., Di Falco, S., De Luca, G., & Capitanio, F. (2022). Agricultural diversification, productivity, and food security across time and space. Agricultural Economics, 53(S1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12742
  10. Cooper, K., Fabian, M., & Krekel, C. (2023). New approaches to measuring welfare. Fiscal Studies, 44(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.12333
  11. Cutter, S. L. (2024). The origin and diffusion of the Social Vulnerability Index (SOVI). International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 109, 104576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104576
  12. Datta, P., Rahut, D. B., Behera, B., Sonobe, T., & Naveen, N. (2024). Assessing forest villagers’ livelihood vulnerability to environmental changes in the Buxa Tiger Reserve of sub-Himalayan India. Trees, Forests, and People, 17, 100632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100632
  13. De Carvalho, Í. C. S., Di Serio, L. C., Guimarães, C. M. C., & Furlanetto, K. S. (2020). Social progress on the development of global competitiveness. Competitiveness Review an International Business Journal Incorporating Journal of Global Competitiveness, 31(4), 713–728. https://doi.org/10.1108/cr-12-2018-0078
  14. Donadelli, M., Grüning, P., Jüppner, M., & Kizys, R. (2021). Global temperature, R&D expenditure and growth. Energy Economics, 104, 105608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105608
  15. Eshetu, F., Haji, J., Ketema, M., & Mehare, A. (2023). Impact of rural out-migration on poverty of households in southern Ethiopia. Cogent Economics & Finance, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2169996
  16. Fleurbaey, M., & Zuber, S. (2021). Fair utilitarianism. American Economic Journal Microeconomics, 13(2), 370–401. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20170234
  17. Hansen, J., Hellin, J., Rosenstock, T., Fisher, E., Cairns, J., Stirling, C., Lamanna, C., Van Etten, J., Rose, A., & Campbell, B. (2018). Climate risk management and rural poverty reduction. Agricultural Systems, 172, 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.01.019
  18. Holden, S. T., & Ghebru, H. (2016). Land tenure reforms, tenure security, and food security in poor agrarian economies: Causal linkages and research gaps. Global Food Security, 10, 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2016.07.002
  19. Jha, C. K., & Gupta, V. (2021). Farmer’s perception and factors determining the adaptation decisions to cope with climate change: Evidence from rural India. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 10, 100112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2021.100112
  20. Kapruwan, R., Saksham, A. K., Bhadoriya,  S., Kumar, C., Goyal, Y., & Pandey, R. (2024). Household livelihood resilience of pastoralists and smallholders to climate change in the Western Himalaya, India. Heliyon, 10(2), e24133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24133
  21. Kaur, H., Srinivas, A., & Bazaz, A. (2021). Understanding access to agrarian knowledge systems: Perspectives from rural Karnataka. Climate Services, 21, 100205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2020.100205
  22. Kinney, M., Kumar, M. B., Kaboré, I., Kiendrébéogo, J., Waiswa, P., & Lawn, J. E. (2024). Global Financing Facility investments for vulnerable populations: content analysis of maternal and newborn health and stillbirths in 11 African countries, 2015 to 2019. Global Health Action, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2024.2329369
  23. Lepers, E. (2024). Fiscal policy as credit policy: Homeownership subsidization and the household debt boom. Economy and Society, 53(2), 322–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2024.2344354
  24. Lucas, D. (2023). Introduction to the ARFE theme on the social discount rate. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 15(1), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-111820-084531
  25. Makate, C., Angelsen, A., Holden, S. T., & Westengen, O. T. (2022). Crops in crises: Shocks shape smallholders’ diversification in rural Ethiopia. World Development, 159, 106054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106054
  26. Mosse, D. (2018). Caste and development: Contemporary perspectives on a structure of discrimination and advantage. World Development, 110, 422–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.06.003
  27. Mukherjee, M., & Fransen, S. (2024). Exploring migration decision-making and agricultural adaptation in the context of climate change: A systematic review. World Development, 179, 106600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106600
  28. Nayak, S., & Jatav, S. S. (2023). Are the livelihoods of slum dwellers sustainable and secure in developing economies? Evidence from Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. Heliyon, 9(9), e19177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19177
  29. Neto, G. G. R., Kchouk, S., Melsen, L. A., Cavalcante, L., Walker, D. W., Dewulf, A., Costa, A. C., Martins, E. S. P. R., & Van Oel, P. R. (2023). HESS Opinions: Drought impacts as failed prospects. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 27(22), 4217–4225. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4217-2023
  30. Nienkerke, I. M., Thorat, A., & Patt, A. (2022). From distress migration to selective migration: Transformative effects of agricultural development on seasonal migration. World Development Perspectives, 29, 100483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2022.100483
  31. Perelmiter, L. (2021). “Fairness” in an unequal society: Welfare workers, labor inspectors, and the embedded moralities of street‐level bureaucracy in Argentina. Public Administration and Development, 42(1), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1954
  32. Sangha, K. K., Duvert, A., Archer, R., & Russell-Smith, J. (2020). Unrealized economic opportunities in remote Indigenous communities: Case studies from Northern Australia. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2(1), 100093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100093
  33. Schoneveld, G. C., & Weng, X. (2023). Smallholder value creation in agrifood chains: A value network approach. Land Use Policy, 131, 106676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106676
  34. Shaban, A., Kourtit, K., Nijkamp, P., & Das, B. (2024). Socio-ecological shocks, weak community support systems, and tragic responses of farmers: A modeling study on India. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 16(9), 100030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rspp.2024.100030
  35. Shiferaw, B., Tesfaye, K., Kassie, M., Abate, T., Prasanna, B., & Menkir, A. (2014). Managing vulnerability to drought and enhancing livelihood resilience in sub-Saharan Africa: Technological, institutional, and policy options. Weather and Climate Extremes, 3, 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2014.04.004
  36. Singh, C., Rahman, A., Srinivas, A., & Bazaz, A. (2018). Risks and responses in rural India: Implications for local climate change adaptation action. Climate Risk Management, 21, 52–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2018.06.001
  37. Singh, N. P., Anand, B., Singh, S., & Khan, A. (2019). Mainstreaming climate adaptation in the Indian rural development agenda: A micro-macro convergence. Climate Risk Management, 24, 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2019.04.003
  38. Stern, N., Stiglitz, J., & Taylor, C. (2022). The economics of immense risk, urgent action, and radical change: towards new approaches to the economics of climate change. Journal of Economic Methodology, 29(3), 181–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178x.2022.2040740
  39. Sultana, N., & Paul, S. R. (2024). Indicators of riverbank erosion vulnerability assessment: A systematic literature review for future research. HydroResearch, 7, 337–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydres.2024.06.002
  40. Trivedi, S. K., Roy, A. D., Kumar, P., Jena, D., & Sinha, A. (2023). Prediction of consumers’ LPG refill frequency: A study using explainable machine learning. Heliyon, 10(1), e23466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23466
  41. Tsiantikoudis, N., Zafeiriou, N., Kyriakopoulos, N., & Arab (2019). Revising the environmental Kuznets Curve for deforestation: An empirical study of Bulgaria. Sustainability, 11(16), 4364. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164364
  42. Vásquez, L. A. (2020). If you do not owe, you do not own: debt, discipline, and growth in rural Colombia. Journal of Rural Studies, 78, 271–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.06.025
  43. Von Groß, V., Sibhatu, K. T., Knohl, A., Qaim, M., Veldkamp, E., Hölscher, D., Zemp, D. C., Corre, M. D., Grass, I., Fiedler, S., Stiegler, C., Irawan, B., Sundawati, L., Husmann, K., & Paul, C. (2024). Transformation scenarios towards multifunctional landscapes: A multi-criteria land-use allocation model applied to Jambi Province, Indonesia. Journal of Environmental Management, 356, 120710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120710
  44. Wahlund, M., & Hansen, T. (2022). Exploring alternative economic pathways: A comparison of foundational economy and doughnut economics. Sustainability Science Practice and Policy, 18(1), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2022.2030280
  45. Xu, Z., Qayum, M., Afzal, J., & Aslam, M. (2023). Availability and access to livelihood capital assets for the development of sustainable livelihood strategies of fishermen: A case study of Manchar Lake Pakistan. Heliyon, 9(12), e22549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22549
  46. Yeleliere, E., Antwi-Agyei, P., & Guodaar, L. (2023). Farmers responses to climate variability and change in rainfed farming systems: Insights from farmers lived experiences Heliyon, 9(9), e19656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19656

Rural distress remains a persistent challenge in India, driven by climatic shocks, social inequality, small landholdings, and reliance on informal credit. This study examines how institutional credit can help reduce rural hardship and promote inclusive economic growth. Using long-term data from the Reserve Bank of India, NABARD, and government sources, the analysis tracks trends in loans issued and outstanding across cooperatives, scheduled commercial banks (SCBs), and regional rural banks (RRBs) from 1990–91 to 2023-24. It also assesses the adoption of the Kisan Credit Card (KCC) scheme to achieve financial inclusion in India. The results show rapid growth in institutional credit, with SCBs becoming the main lenders, while cooperatives and RRBs have seen their shares decline despite their community presence. Increasing outstanding loans indicate greater dependence on formal credit but also raise concerns about debt levels and repayment capacity. The KCC scheme has reached over 7 crore farmers, although changes in its adoption suggest uneven access and institutional hurdles. The study concludes that expanding credit alone cannot fully solve rural distress. It must be combined with social protection, climate-smart practices, and inclusive policies to support sustainable livelihoods. Strengthening cooperatives and RRBs, along with improving efficiency, is key to creating a balanced rural financial system. This study contributes to the discussion of rural development by linking institutional credit to livelihood security, resilience, and inclusive growth.

Keywords : Rural Distress, Institutional Credit, Livelihood Security, Financial Inclusion, Economic Development, India.

Paper Submission Last Date
28 - February - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe