Authors :
Bebe Bebe Ngwaba; Augustin Pambi Tadiamba
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 7 - July
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/y5f25u6y
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/4fn8c9vb
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jul347
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Traffic-violation monitoring in Kinshasa is constrained by discontinuous controls, fragmented case records, and
limited traceability. This study develops a socio-technical framework for a traceable traffic-violation intelligence system and
tests the feasibility of an analytical prototype in Gombe and Barumbu. A convergent mixed-methods design combined 200
questionnaires, 18 semi-structured interviews, 24 observation sessions, and 22 documentary sources. These materials were
triangulated to identify operational needs, institutional constraints, and functional requirements. An anonymised
experimental dataset of 500 cases was then used to test a supervised classification workflow for predicting violation-severity
levels (low, medium, and high). The prototype used one-hot encoding, a stratified 75/25 train-test split, and a Random Forest
classifier with 150 trees and balanced class weights. The field evidence shows distinct local profiles: Gombe records more
dynamic violations, particularly speeding and red-light running, whereas Barumbu presents more illegal stopping, road-use
conflicts, and overloading. The most pronounced barriers are insufficient digital tools, weak archiving, limited staff training,
poor coordination, and unreliable energy or connectivity.
Keywords :
Traffic-Violation Monitoring; Data Governance; Machine Learning; Computer Vision; Random Forest; Kinshasa.
References :
- Bostrom, R. P., & Heinen, J. S. (1977). MIS problems and failures: A socio-technical perspective. Part I: The causes. MIS Quarterly, 1(3), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.2307/248710
- Buch, N., Velastin, S. A., & Orwell, J. (2011). A review of computer vision techniques for the analysis of urban traffic. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 12(3), 920-939. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2011.2119372
- Chai, A. B. Z., Lau, B. T., Tee, M. K. T., & McCarthy, C. (2024). Enhancing road safety with machine learning: Current advances and future directions in accident prediction using non-visual data. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 133, 109086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109086
- Coifman, B., Beymer, D., McLauchlan, P., & Malik, J. (1998). A real-time computer vision system for vehicle tracking and traffic surveillance. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 6(4), 271-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-090X(98)00019-9
- Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
- De Mauro, A., Greco, M., & Grimaldi, M. (2016). A formal definition of Big Data based on its essential features. Library Review, 65(3), 122-135. https://doi.org/10.1108/LR-06-2015-0061
- Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75-105. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625
- Kaffash, S., Nguyen, A. T., & Zhu, J. (2021). Big data algorithms and applications in intelligent transportation systems: A survey and bibliometric analysis. Sustainable Cities and Society, 75, 103299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103299
- Kayisu, A. K., Mikušová, M., Bokoro, P. N., & Kyamakya, K. (2024). Exploring the potential of smart mobility in Kinshasa (DR Congo) as a means of addressing traffic congestion and improving road safety: A comprehensive feasibility assessment. Sustainability, 16(21), 9371. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219371
- Montoya-Torres, J. R., Moreno, S., Guerrero, W. J., & Mejía, G. (2021). Big data analytics and intelligent transportation systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 54(2), 216-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.06.025
- Razi, A., Chen, Y., Yu, H., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Deep learning for traffic safety analysis: A forward-looking review. IET Intelligent Transport Systems. https://doi.org/10.1049/itr2.12257
- Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
- Silva, P. B., Andrade, M., & Ferreira, S. (2020). Machine learning applied to road safety modeling: A systematic literature review. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 7(6), 775-790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2020.07.004
- Szeliski, R. (2022). Computer vision: Algorithms and applications (2nd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34372-9
- Thompson, J., Lowry, M., & Abdel-Rahim, A. (2024). Computer vision for traffic monitoring. Washington State Transportation Center, Washington State University.
- Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
- World Health Organization. (2023). Global status report on road safety 2023. WHO.
Traffic-violation monitoring in Kinshasa is constrained by discontinuous controls, fragmented case records, and
limited traceability. This study develops a socio-technical framework for a traceable traffic-violation intelligence system and
tests the feasibility of an analytical prototype in Gombe and Barumbu. A convergent mixed-methods design combined 200
questionnaires, 18 semi-structured interviews, 24 observation sessions, and 22 documentary sources. These materials were
triangulated to identify operational needs, institutional constraints, and functional requirements. An anonymised
experimental dataset of 500 cases was then used to test a supervised classification workflow for predicting violation-severity
levels (low, medium, and high). The prototype used one-hot encoding, a stratified 75/25 train-test split, and a Random Forest
classifier with 150 trees and balanced class weights. The field evidence shows distinct local profiles: Gombe records more
dynamic violations, particularly speeding and red-light running, whereas Barumbu presents more illegal stopping, road-use
conflicts, and overloading. The most pronounced barriers are insufficient digital tools, weak archiving, limited staff training,
poor coordination, and unreliable energy or connectivity.
Keywords :
Traffic-Violation Monitoring; Data Governance; Machine Learning; Computer Vision; Random Forest; Kinshasa.