⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



From Fragmented Traffic-Violation Records to Intelligent Monitoring in Kinshasa: A Mixed-Methods Prototype Integrating Big Data, Computer-Vision Readiness and Machine-Learning–Supported Severity Assessment


Authors : Bebe Bebe Ngwaba; Augustin Pambi Tadiamba

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 7 - July


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/y5f25u6y

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/4fn8c9vb

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jul347

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : Traffic-violation monitoring in Kinshasa is constrained by discontinuous controls, fragmented case records, and limited traceability. This study develops a socio-technical framework for a traceable traffic-violation intelligence system and tests the feasibility of an analytical prototype in Gombe and Barumbu. A convergent mixed-methods design combined 200 questionnaires, 18 semi-structured interviews, 24 observation sessions, and 22 documentary sources. These materials were triangulated to identify operational needs, institutional constraints, and functional requirements. An anonymised experimental dataset of 500 cases was then used to test a supervised classification workflow for predicting violation-severity levels (low, medium, and high). The prototype used one-hot encoding, a stratified 75/25 train-test split, and a Random Forest classifier with 150 trees and balanced class weights. The field evidence shows distinct local profiles: Gombe records more dynamic violations, particularly speeding and red-light running, whereas Barumbu presents more illegal stopping, road-use conflicts, and overloading. The most pronounced barriers are insufficient digital tools, weak archiving, limited staff training, poor coordination, and unreliable energy or connectivity.

Keywords : Traffic-Violation Monitoring; Data Governance; Machine Learning; Computer Vision; Random Forest; Kinshasa.

References :

  1. Bostrom, R. P., & Heinen, J. S. (1977). MIS problems and failures: A socio-technical perspective. Part I: The causes. MIS Quarterly, 1(3), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.2307/248710
  2. Buch, N., Velastin, S. A., & Orwell, J. (2011). A review of computer vision techniques for the analysis of urban traffic. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 12(3), 920-939. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2011.2119372
  3. Chai, A. B. Z., Lau, B. T., Tee, M. K. T., & McCarthy, C. (2024). Enhancing road safety with machine learning: Current advances and future directions in accident prediction using non-visual data. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 133, 109086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109086
  4. Coifman, B., Beymer, D., McLauchlan, P., & Malik, J. (1998). A real-time computer vision system for vehicle tracking and traffic surveillance. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 6(4), 271-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-090X(98)00019-9
  5. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
  6. De Mauro, A., Greco, M., & Grimaldi, M. (2016). A formal definition of Big Data based on its essential features. Library Review, 65(3), 122-135. https://doi.org/10.1108/LR-06-2015-0061
  7. Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75-105. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625
  8. Kaffash, S., Nguyen, A. T., & Zhu, J. (2021). Big data algorithms and applications in intelligent transportation systems: A survey and bibliometric analysis. Sustainable Cities and Society, 75, 103299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103299
  9. Kayisu, A. K., Mikušová, M., Bokoro, P. N., & Kyamakya, K. (2024). Exploring the potential of smart mobility in Kinshasa (DR Congo) as a means of addressing traffic congestion and improving road safety: A comprehensive feasibility assessment. Sustainability, 16(21), 9371. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219371
  10. Montoya-Torres, J. R., Moreno, S., Guerrero, W. J., & Mejía, G. (2021). Big data analytics and intelligent transportation systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 54(2), 216-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.06.025
  11. Razi, A., Chen, Y., Yu, H., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Deep learning for traffic safety analysis: A forward-looking review. IET Intelligent Transport Systems. https://doi.org/10.1049/itr2.12257
  12. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
  13. Silva, P. B., Andrade, M., & Ferreira, S. (2020). Machine learning applied to road safety modeling: A systematic literature review. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 7(6), 775-790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2020.07.004
  14. Szeliski, R. (2022). Computer vision: Algorithms and applications (2nd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34372-9
  15. Thompson, J., Lowry, M., & Abdel-Rahim, A. (2024). Computer vision for traffic monitoring. Washington State Transportation Center, Washington State University.
  16. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  17. World Health Organization. (2023). Global status report on road safety 2023. WHO.

Traffic-violation monitoring in Kinshasa is constrained by discontinuous controls, fragmented case records, and limited traceability. This study develops a socio-technical framework for a traceable traffic-violation intelligence system and tests the feasibility of an analytical prototype in Gombe and Barumbu. A convergent mixed-methods design combined 200 questionnaires, 18 semi-structured interviews, 24 observation sessions, and 22 documentary sources. These materials were triangulated to identify operational needs, institutional constraints, and functional requirements. An anonymised experimental dataset of 500 cases was then used to test a supervised classification workflow for predicting violation-severity levels (low, medium, and high). The prototype used one-hot encoding, a stratified 75/25 train-test split, and a Random Forest classifier with 150 trees and balanced class weights. The field evidence shows distinct local profiles: Gombe records more dynamic violations, particularly speeding and red-light running, whereas Barumbu presents more illegal stopping, road-use conflicts, and overloading. The most pronounced barriers are insufficient digital tools, weak archiving, limited staff training, poor coordination, and unreliable energy or connectivity.

Keywords : Traffic-Violation Monitoring; Data Governance; Machine Learning; Computer Vision; Random Forest; Kinshasa.

Paper Submission Last Date
31 - July - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe