Authors : Ajay M G

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 7 - July

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/yc2fnres

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/5a8xxt9u

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25jul1967

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

Abstract : This study explores the transformative intersection between global labour norms and local governance innovations by interrogating the application of the International Labour Organization’s (ILO) Decent Work framework within India’s Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS). Focusing on the tribal districts of Wayanad, Idukki, and Palakkad in Kerala—regions marked by both ecological distinctiveness and socio-economic vulnerability—the research critically examines how labour is redefined as a right, a resource, and a site of empowerment. Drawing on a mixed-methods approach that integrates decade-long secondary data (2014–2025), policy documents, visual analytics, and field-based narratives, the paper analyzes the systemic underrepresentation of Scheduled Tribes (STs) in MGNREGS despite constitutional entitlements. In response, Kerala’s “Tribal Plus” strategy is foregrounded as a model of localised governance—featuring tribal resource facilitation, culturally contextual asset creation, and decentralized grievance redressal—which reanimates the ILO’s abstract norms into meaningful rural realities. By bridging theoretical constructs with empirical insight, the study not only critiques the performative inadequacies of labour-centric policies but also offers a replicable blueprint for rights-based rural employment. It advances the discourse on labour justice, especially in postcolonial and pluralistic societies, and contributes a timely intervention in the global conversation on inclusive development, indigenous agency, and institutional accountability.

Keywords : ILO, MGNREGS, Kerala, Tribal Plus, Labour Rights, Economic Empowerment, Scheduled Tribes, Rural Employment, Social Inclusion.

References :

1. Ferraro, T., Dos Santos, N. R., Pais, L., & Mónico, L. (2016). Historical landmarks of decent  work. European Journal of Applied Business and Management, 2(1).
2. World Bank Group. (2015). The state of social safety nets.
3. Drèze, J., & Khera, R. (2017). Recent social security initiatives in India. World Development, 98, 555-572.
4. Carswell, G., & De Neve, G. (2014). Labour, mobility and immobility in rural India. Modern Asian Studies, 48(5), 1292–1320.
5. Patwardhan, S., & Tasciotti, L. (2023). The effect of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act on the size of outstanding debts in rural India. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 15(4), 353-372.
6. Sen, A. (2000). Social exclusion: Concept, application, and scrutiny.
7. Parayil, G., & Sreekumar, T. T. (2003). Kerala's experience of development and change. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 33(4), 465-492.
8. Government of Kerala. (2022). MGNREGS Tribal Plus Implementation Manual.
9. Tribal Development Report. (2022). Livelihoods and Development in Scheduled Areas. Bharat Rural Livelihoods Foundation.
10. Fraser, N. (2005). Reframing global justice. New left review, 36, 69.
11. Escobar, A. (2011). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press.
12. Ferguson, J. (1990). The anti-politics machine. Development, depoliticization.
13. Imbert, C., & Papp, J. (2015). Labor market effects of social programs: Evidence from india's employment guarantee. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 7(2), 233-263.
14. Khera, R., & Nayak, N. (2009). Women workers and perceptions of the national rural employment guarantee act. Economic and political weekly, 49-57.
15. Srivastava, R. (2020). Labour migration, vulnerability, and development policy: The pandemic as inflexion point?. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 63(4), 859-883.
16. Devika, J., & Thampi, B. V. (2007). Between ‘Empowerment’ and ‘Liberation’ The Kudumbashree Initiative in Kerala. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 14(1), 33-60.
17. Government of Kerala. (2011). The Performance of NREGS in Phase-I and Phase-II Districts in Kerala: An Evaluation Study. Evaluation Division, Kerala State Planning Board, Thiruvananthapuram
18. Roy, S., Majumder, S., Bose, A., & Chowdhury, I. R. (2024). The rich-poor divide: Unravelling the spatial complexities and determinants of wealth inequality in India. Applied Geography, 166, 103267.
19. Dutta, P., Murgai, R., Ravallion, M., & Van de Walle, D. (2014). Right to work?: assessing India's employment guarantee scheme in Bihar. World Bank Publications.
20. Kabeer, N. (2005). Gender equality and women's empowerment: A critical analysis of the third millennium development goal 1. Gender & development, 13(1), 13-24.
21. Xaxa, V. (2001). Protective discrimination: Why scheduled tribes lag behind scheduled castes. Economic and Political weekly, 2765-2772.
22. Baviskar, A. (2005). Adivasi encounters with Hindu nationalism in MP. Economic and Political Weekly, 5105-5113.
23. Crepelle, A. (2024). Tribal Law: It's Not That Scary. Buff. L. Rev., 72, 547.
24. Gunderson, M. (1989). Male-female wage differentials and policy responses. Journal of economic literature, 27(1), 46-72.
25. Issac, T. M. (2003). Thomas and Patrick Heller,‘. Democracy and Development: Decentralised Planning in Kerala’, in Deepening Democracy, edited by Archon Fung and Erik Olin Wright, 77-100.
26. Corbridge, S. (2005). Seeing the state: Governance and governmentality in India (Vol. 10). Cambridge University Press.
27. Fraser, N. (2008). Social justice in the age of identity politics: Redistribution, recognition, and participation. In Geographic thought (pp. 72-89). Routledge.
28. Yamane, Y. (1967). Mathematical Formulae for Sample Size Determination.
29. Economic Review (2024).Kerala State Planning Board, Thiruvananthapuram.