Functional Outcome of Cast Immobilisation and Functional Treatment in Management of Lateral Ankle Sprain (Grade 1 and 2)


Authors : Dr. Akhil Sharma; Dr. George Joseph

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 10 - October


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3n28t4ea

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/9v3nee2d

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24OCT1083

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : Background: Pain and functional constraints from ankle sprains, which mostly impact the lateral ligamentous complex, can lead to the consumption of medical facilities and unavailability from workplace. No single technique is regarded as the most effective, despite the fact that this injury occurs frequently. This study evaluates the management modalities for lateral ankle sprain i.e. functional treatment and cast immobilization with pain and function as outcome variables.  Materials and methods: Seventy patients with lateral ankle sprains (grade 1 and 2) were included in this study. Each alternate participant was placed in a functional treatment (group A), while the other participants were placed in a cast immobilization group (group B). Every patient was assessed at a follow up of 2 and 6 weeks using Visual analog scale and Karlsson score for quantifying pain and function respectively.  Results: Thirty-two patients in the functional therapy group and twenty-eight in the cast immobilization group finished the study. The functional therapy group's mean age was 27.7 years, while the cast immobilization group's was 29.4 years. While both the right and left ankles were similarly impacted in the cast immobilization group, the dominant ankle involved in the functional treatment group was the right ankle in 19 patients and the left ankle in 16 patients. In both groups, a male preponderance was seen. By the end of the study, the mean differences between the two groups' Karlsson scores and visual analog scale scores were statistically significant.  Conclusion: Our study's findings show that a functional treatment outperforms immobilization in terms of both functional outcome and pain reduction.

Keywords : Lateral Malleolus, Functional Treatment.

References :

[1]. Lamb SE, Nakash RA, Withers EJ, Clark M, Marsh JL,
Wilson S, Hutton JL, Szczepura A, Dale JR, Cooke MW.
Clinical and cost effectiveness of mechanical support for
severe ankle sprains: design of a randomised controlled
trial in the emergency department [ISRCTN 37807450].
BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2005 Jan 13;6(1):1.
[2]. Wolfe MW. Management of ankle sprains. American
family physician. 2001 Jan 1;63(1).
[3]. Dubin JC, Comeau D, McClelland RI, Dubin RA, Ferrel
E. Lateral and syndesmotic ankle sprain injuries: a
narrative literature review. Journal of chiropractic
medicine. 2011 Sep 30;10(3):204-19.
[4]. Ekman EF, Fiechtner JJ, Levy S, Fort JG. Efficacy of
celecoxib versus ibuprofen in the treatment of acute pain:
a multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial
in acute ankle sprain. American journal of orthopedics
(Belle Mead, NJ). 2002 Aug;31(8):445-51.
[5]. Kemler E, van de Port I, Backx F, van Dijk CN. A
systematic review on the treatment of acute ankle sprain.
Sports medicine. 2011 Mar 1;41(3):185-97.
[6]. Kerkhoffs GM, Struijs PA, Marti RK, Assendelft WJ,
Blankevoort L, Van Dijk CN. Different functional
treatment strategies for acute lateral ankle ligament
injuries in adults. The cochrane library. 2002.
[7]. Lamb SE, Marsh JL, Hutton JL, Nakash R, Cooke MW,
Collaborative Ankle Support Trial (CAST Group.
Mechanical supports for acute, severe ankle sprain: a
pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. The
Lancet. 2009 Feb 20;373(9663):575-81.
[8]. Noh JH, Yang BG, Yi SR, Lee SH, Song CH. Outcome
of the functional treatment of first-time ankle inversion
injury. Journal of Orthopaedic Science. 2010 Jul
1;15(4):524-30.
[9]. Purcell SB, Schuckman BE, Docherty CL, Schrader J,
Poppy W. Differences in ankle range of motion before
and after exercise in 2 tape conditions. The American
journal of sports medicine. 2009 Feb 1;37(2):383-9.
[10]. Refshauge KM, Raymond J, Kilbreath SL, Pengel L,
Heijnen I. The effect of ankle taping on detection of
inversion-eversion movements in participants with
recurrent ankle sprain. The American journal of sports
medicine. 2009 Feb 1;37(2):371-5.
[11]. Klenerman L. The management of the sprained ankle.

JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-
BRITISH VOLUME-. 1998 Jan 1;80:11-2.

[12]. Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Gilbart M. Treatment modalities for
soft tissue injuries of the ankle: a critical review. Clinical
Journal of Sport Medicine. 1995 Jul 1;5(3):175- 86.

[13]. Hosea TM, Carey CC, Harrer MF. The gender issue:
epidemiology of ankle injuries in athletes who
participate in basketball. Clinical orthopaedics and
related research. 2000 Mar 1;372:45-9.
[14]. Beynnon BD, Murphy DF, Alosa DM. Predictive factors
for lateral ankle sprains: a literature review. Journal of
athletic training. 2002 Oct 1;37(4):376.
[15]. Eiff MP, Smith AT, Smith GE. Early mobilization versus
immobilization in the treatment of lateral ankle sprains.
The American journal of sports medicine. 1994 Jan
1;22(1):83-8.
[16]. Seah R, Mani-Babu S. Managing ankle sprains in
primary care: what is best practice? A systematic review
of the last 10 years of evidence. British medical bulletin.
2010 Aug 14:ldq028.
[17]. Uh BS, Beynnon BD, Helie BV, Alosa DM, Renstrom
PA. The Benefit of a Single-Leg Strength Training
Program For the Muscles Around the Untrained Ankle A
Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study. The
American journal of sports medicine. 2000 Jul
1;28(4):568-73.
[18]. Eils E, Rosenbaum D. A multi-station proprioceptive
exercise program in patients with ankle instability.
Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 2001 Dec
1;33(12):1991-8.
[19]. Matsusaka N, Yokoyama S, Tsurusaki T, Inokuchi S,
Okita M. Effect of ankle disk training combined with
tactile stimulation to the leg and foot on functional
instability of the ankle. The American journal of sports
medicine. 2001 Jan 1;29(1):25-30.
[20]. Denegar CR, Miller III SJ. Can chronic ankle instability
be prevented? Rethinking management of lateral ankle
sprains. Journal of athletic training. 2002 Oct
1;37(4):430.
[21]. McKay GD, Goldie PA, Payne WR, Oakes BW. Ankle
injuries in basketball: injury rate and risk factors. British
Journal of Sports Medicine. 2001 Apr 1;35(2):103-8.
[22]. Surve I, Schwellnus MP, Noakes T, Lombard C. A
fivefold reduction in the incidence of recurrent ankle
sprains in soccer players using the Sport-Stirrup orthosis.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 1994
Sep;22(5):601-6.
[23]. Sitler M, Ryan J, Wheeler B, McBride J, Arciero R,
Anderson J, Horodyski M. The efficacy of a semirigid
ankle stabilizer to reduce acute ankle injuries in
basketball a randomized clinical study at West Point. The
American Journal of Sports Medicine. 1994 Jul
1;22(4):454-61.

Background: Pain and functional constraints from ankle sprains, which mostly impact the lateral ligamentous complex, can lead to the consumption of medical facilities and unavailability from workplace. No single technique is regarded as the most effective, despite the fact that this injury occurs frequently. This study evaluates the management modalities for lateral ankle sprain i.e. functional treatment and cast immobilization with pain and function as outcome variables.  Materials and methods: Seventy patients with lateral ankle sprains (grade 1 and 2) were included in this study. Each alternate participant was placed in a functional treatment (group A), while the other participants were placed in a cast immobilization group (group B). Every patient was assessed at a follow up of 2 and 6 weeks using Visual analog scale and Karlsson score for quantifying pain and function respectively.  Results: Thirty-two patients in the functional therapy group and twenty-eight in the cast immobilization group finished the study. The functional therapy group's mean age was 27.7 years, while the cast immobilization group's was 29.4 years. While both the right and left ankles were similarly impacted in the cast immobilization group, the dominant ankle involved in the functional treatment group was the right ankle in 19 patients and the left ankle in 16 patients. In both groups, a male preponderance was seen. By the end of the study, the mean differences between the two groups' Karlsson scores and visual analog scale scores were statistically significant.  Conclusion: Our study's findings show that a functional treatment outperforms immobilization in terms of both functional outcome and pain reduction.

Keywords : Lateral Malleolus, Functional Treatment.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe