Authors : Dr. Yssouf Camara

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 1 - January

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/5f9wva83

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/bdf8szxf

DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14651284

Abstract : We found that gender relations significantly determine the use of innovation as well as the level of change in farming systems in the Smallholder Farming Systems (SHFs). This paper analyzes the controversies surrounding the gendered nature of technologies for soybean production, especially in terms of how male and female producers gain access to, and utilise, and accrue the benefits of soybean technology. Using cross-sectional data and examples from several successful textile case studies, the paper underscores difficulty in obtaining funding, decision-making, and extension services. Through the study, it was found that women farmers produced more crops but they lacked access to purchase improved soybean seeds, trainings and markets. (Quisumbring & Pandolfelli, 2010; Meinzen-Dick Et Al., 2011). The study demonstrates that gender aspect of soybean farming benefication is gendered by existing socio- cultural and structural factors. But where they are given specific information, gender sensitive capacity building and training, as well as other infrastructure inputs, women farmers show high levels of uptake and productivity (Njuki Etal., 2016; Kassie Et Al., 2015). This paper establishes that there is need to have policies and programmes that redress the above disparities and encourage women participation in innovative agriculture. In as much as this paper looks at the gender and soybean adoption, this work sits within the larger academic narrative on gender in agriculture with a view to address how to tap on the potential that women farmers hold in today’s changing society to embrace sustainable practices. Others are about focusing the gender dimension of agricultural services for extension, supporting formation of women’s groups, and development of market initiatives that will facilitate women in soybean value chains. These interventions present the possibility of nonzero sum, both in a global and intra-generation equity sense, as well as enhanced rural nonfarm income (Doss, 2018; Beuchelt & Badstue, 2013).

Keywords : Gender Dynamic, Soybean Adoption, Agricultural Innovation, Women Farmers, Gender- Sensitive Policies.

References :

1. Beuchelt, T. D., & Badstue, L. (2013). Gender, Nutrition, And Climate-Smart Food Production: Opportunities And Trade-Offs. Food Security, 5(5), 709-721. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S12571-013-0290-8.
2. Doss, C. R. (2018). Women And Agricultural Productivity: Reframing The Issues. Development Policy Review, 36(1), 35-50. Https://Doi.Org/10.1111/Dpr.12243
3. Farnworth, C. R., Sundell, M. F., Nzioki, A., Shivutse, V., & Davis, M. (2019). Transforming Gender Relations In Agriculture In Sub-Saharan Africa. Gender, Technology And Development, 23(1), 48-65. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/09718524.2019.1649795
4. Fisher, M., & Carr, E. R. (2015). The Influence Of Gendered Roles And Responsibilities On The Adoption Of Technologies. Agriculture And Human Values, 32(4), 593-605. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S10460-015-9588-5
5. Galiè, A., Jiggins, J., & Struik, P. C. (2013). Women’S Identity As Farmers: A Case Study From Tanzania. Women’S Studies International Forum, 40, 46-56. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Wsif.2013.04.003
6. Giller, K. E., & Delaune, T. (2021). Gender And The Soybean Story In Sub-Saharan Africa. Agriculture For Development, 42(3), 20-24.
7. Hill, R. V., & Vigneri, M. (2014). Mainstreaming Gender Sensitivity In Cash Crop Markets: Evidence From Ghana. World Development, 64, 42-62. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Worlddev.2014.03.007
8. Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, Agency, Achievements: Reflections On The Measurement Of Women’S Empowerment. Development And Change, 30(3), 435-464. Https://Doi.Org/10.1111/1467-7660.00125
9. Kassie, M., Stage, J., Diiro, G., & Mekuria, M. (2015). Gendered Food Security In Rural Malawi. World Development, 74, 363-379. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Worlddev.2015.05.003
10. Meinzen-Dick, R., Quisumbing, A. R., Behrman, J., Biermayr-Jenzano, P., Wilde, V., Noordeloos, M., Ragasa, C., & Beintema, N. (2011). Engendering Agricultural Research, Development, And Extension. Ifpri Discussion Paper No. 973.
11. Njuki, J., Parkins, J. R., & Kaler, A. (2016). Transforming Gender Relations In Agriculture In Sub- Saharan Africa. Routledge.
12. Quisumbing, A. R., & Pandolfelli, L. (2010). Promising Approaches To Address The Needs Of Poor Female Farmers: Resources, Constraints, And Interventions. World Development, 38(4), 581-592. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Worlddev.2009.10.006
13. Ragasa, C., Berhane, G., Tadesse, F., & Taffesse, A. S. (2013). Gender Differences In Access To Extension Services And Agricultural Productivity. Journal Of Agricultural Economics, 64(3), 465-492. Https://Doi.Org/10.1111/1477-9552.12040
14. Seymour, G., & Peterman, A. (2018). Understanding The Gender Dimensions Of Agricultural Productivity. Food Policy, 83, 36-50. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Foodpol.2018.11.003
15. Sseguya, H., Mazur, R. E., & Njuki, J. (2019). Gendered Roles In Soybean Production And Marketing In Uganda. International Journal Of Agricultural Sustainability, 17(1), 57-72. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/14735903.2019.1625758
16. Traore, A., The Impact Of Soybean Adoption On Households’Crop Production Value In Mozambique: Agenetic Matching Approach, Management And Economic Journal, Volume 2024, Page 1-15. Https://Doi.Org/10.18535/Mej/V2024.04.
17. Udry, C., Hoddinott, J., Alderman, H., & Haddad, L. (1995). Gender Differentials In Farm Productivity: Implications For Household Efficiency And Agricultural Policy. Food Policy, 20(5), 407-423. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/0306-9192(95)00035-D
18. World Bank, Fao, & Ifad. (2009). Gender In Agriculture Sourcebook. Washington, Dc: The World Bank.
19. Yila, J., & Resurreccion, B. P. (2013). Gender Perspectives On Adoption Of Climate-Smart Agricultural Practices. Climate And Development, 5(3), 288-300. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/17565529.2013.812954