Authors :
Khilola Iakubzhanova
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 8 - August
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/2xjhwyrh
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/mpjd72v7
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25aug1333
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.
Abstract :
The evolution of genetic engineering technologies have brought us to a point where we ask a lot of questions and
there are many debates on whether we should be using innovative technologies like CRISPR-Cas9 in clinical applications in
human embryos. This research essay will argue that no matter how much the technology grows, we have to be 100% sure
about its consequences. In order to be sure, there needs to be deep research on those technologies. Do we know enough about
the human genome to understand the impact of editing it? It is likely that some countries might consider using these
technologies, but while these technologies are fast and cheap, there are consequences in modified embryos that might lead
to mutation. This essay will state that scientists should communicate the power of technology and how they can be responsible
in using it.
References :
- Garreau, Joel. Radical Evolution. Hell Chapter. Doubleday. 2008, pp 51-78.
- Rossant, Janet. “Gene editing in human development: ethical concerns and practical applications”. The Company of Biologists. July, 2018. https://dev.biologists.org/content/145/16/dev150888. Accessed March 10.
- K.N.C. “How genetic engineering will reshape humanity” The Economist. 25 Apr, 2019.www.economist.com/open-future/2019/04/25/how-genetic-engineering-will-reshape-humanity. Accessed February 27, 2020
- Li, Jing-ru. “Experiments that led to the first gene-edited babies: the ethical failings and the urgent need for better governance”, Simon Walker, Jing-bao Nie, Xin-qing Zhang. Bioethics Center, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago and New Zealand School of Humanities and Social Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China. 20 Jan, 2019. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6331330/. Accessed March 1, 2020.
- Raposo, Vera Lucia. “The First Chinese Edited Babies: A Leap of Faith in Science.” JBRA Assisted Reproduction, Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction, 22 Aug. 2019, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6724388/. Accessed February 27 , 2020
- Simmons, Danielle. “Genetic Inequality: Human Genetic Engineering”. Cheryl Scacheri, Nature Education, 2008. www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/genetic-inequality-human-genetic-engineering-768/#. Accessed February 27, 2020
- Straiton, Jenny. “Genetically Modified Humans: the X-Men of Scientific Research.” BioTechniques, Future Science, 24 May 2019, www.future-science.com/doi/full/10.2144/btn-2019-0056. Accessed February 27, 2020.
The evolution of genetic engineering technologies have brought us to a point where we ask a lot of questions and
there are many debates on whether we should be using innovative technologies like CRISPR-Cas9 in clinical applications in
human embryos. This research essay will argue that no matter how much the technology grows, we have to be 100% sure
about its consequences. In order to be sure, there needs to be deep research on those technologies. Do we know enough about
the human genome to understand the impact of editing it? It is likely that some countries might consider using these
technologies, but while these technologies are fast and cheap, there are consequences in modified embryos that might lead
to mutation. This essay will state that scientists should communicate the power of technology and how they can be responsible
in using it.