Authors : Glory Ann Ruz Herrera; Noel Florencondia; Jeric R. Aduna

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 7 - July

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/bp6yu5s7

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/ys7wnxmp

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25jul1085

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

Abstract : This study evaluates the effectiveness of geotagging technology in enhancing the monitoring of rural infrastructure projects under the Philippine Rural Development Project (PRDP). With the increasing demand for transparency, accountability, and real-time oversight in public construction, geotagging has emerged as a digital tool that offers location- specific, time-stamped visual data to support infrastructure supervision. The study assesses six key dimensions: system quality, information quality, service quality, use, user satisfaction, and net benefits. Using a quantitative-descriptive research design, data were collected from 30 purposively selected respondents, including contractors, Department of Agriculture technical staff, and cooperative-level stakeholders. Surveys and focus group discussions were used to gather insights on the perceived usefulness, challenges, and operational impact of geotagging. Results showed that geotagging significantly improved project oversight, reduced the need for on-site inspections, and enhanced communication between stakeholders. High satisfaction levels were observed in terms of usability and the accuracy of geotagged data. However, technical issues such as device incompatibility, weak GPS signals in remote areas, and the need for regular updates were identified as constraints to optimal use. The study concludes that geotagging is a reliable and scalable tool for public infrastructure monitoring, contributing to improved efficiency and governance. Recommendations include institutionalizing geotagging in project workflows, upgrading digital infrastructure, and expanding its application to all stages of project implementation. These findings offer valuable insights for agencies seeking to digitize infrastructure supervision across dispersed and rural environments.

Keywords : Geotagging Technology, Infrastructure Monitoring, Information Systems Success Model (ISSM), Project Oversight, Rural Development Projects.

References :

1. Akinwande, M., & Korabua, F. (2024). Assessment of measures of central tendency and dispersion using Likert-type scale. African Journal of Advances in Sciences and Technology Research, 16(1), 38–49. Retrieved from https://www.afropolitanjournals.com/ajastr/vol16/Iss1/AJASTR-Vol16-No1-2024_38 49.pdf
2. Amaral, A., Cunha, C., & Afonso, A. (2014). Using GPS and geotagging for construction project management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(5), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000840
3. Applied Clinical Trials. (2023, March 15). Oversight method identifies critical errors missed by traditional monitoring approaches. https://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/view/oversight-method-identifies-critical-errors-missed-by-traditional-monitoring-approaches
4. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
5. FasterCapital. (n.d.). Challenges of geotagging images. Retrieved July 14, 2025, from https://fastercapital.com/term/geotagging-images.html
6. InfiniteJS. (2024, June 18). The problem of geotagging accuracy. Retrieved July 14, 2025, from https://infinitejs.com/posts/geotagging-accuracy-problem
7. Irizarry, J., Costa, D. B., & Hyun, S. (2013). Integrating BIM and GIS to improve construction visual monitoring and project control. Automation in Construction, 31, 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.05.011
8. Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2020). Management information systems: Managing the digital firm (16th ed.). Pearson.
9. Mercurio, R. (2019, February 14). DPWH uses tech vs graft, inefficiency. Philippine Star. Retrieved from https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2019/02/14/1893569/dpwh-uses-tech-vs-graft-inefficiency
10. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2024). Mobile devices as a tool for digitized project documentation and inspection (pp. 1–2). The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/27901
11. Navas, J. F. (2018). Applied geotagging for infrastructure documentation and project monitoring (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/document/337159536/Manuscipt-Navas-Final-Draft 1
12. Oliveira, F. G. de, da Silva, L. F. F., de Brito, F. P. G., & de Rezende, P. V. (2020). Assessment of GPS/GLONASS point positioning in Brazilian regions with distinct ionospheric behavior. Boletim da Sociedade Brasileira de Geologia, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.1590/S1982-21702020000200010
13. Philippine Government. (2015). Geotagging recognized as an effective transparency tool for government projects. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312221053_The_Use_of_Mobile_Geotag_Technology_in_Driving_Project_Performance_at_Scale
14. Philippine Statistics Authority. (2023, March 2). PSA approves the conduct of the 2022 Community Based Monitoring System – geotagging of service institutions and infrastructure, government projects, and natural resources. Retrieved from https://www.psa.gov.ph/content/psa-approves-conduct-2022-community-based-monitoring-system-geotagging-service-institutions
15. Poulton, H. (2017). The use of mobile geotag technology in driving project performance at scale. World Bank Independent Evaluation Group. Retrieved from World Bank IEG website.
16. Rosen, M. (2024, October 22). How mobile computing and GPS technology is bringing geotagging and geofencing to the construction industry. Panasonic Connect. Retrieved from https://eu.connect.panasonic.com/ch/en/blog/how-mobile-computing-and-gps-technology-bringing-geotagging-and-geofencing-construction
17. Samsara. (n.d.). Why GPS is important for construction companies. Retrieved July 14, 2025, from https://www.samsara.com/guides/construction-gps/
18. Tserng, H. P., Yin, S. Y., & Wang, C. M. (2012). Developing geotagging and visualization functions in mobile inspection systems for construction projects. Automation in Construction, 21, 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.07.003
19. World Bank. (2020). Enhancing transparency and accountability through geotagging: Lessons from the Philippines Rural Development Project. World Bank Publications. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2020/02/12/geotagging-for-transparency-in-the-philippines-rural-development-project
20. World Bank. (2021, November 10). Strengthening public sector management in Sindh through geotagging and proactive feedback [Feature story]. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2021/11/10/strengthening-public-sector-management-in-sindh-through-geotagging-and-proactive-feedback
21. World Bank Group. (2013). Philippines: Geo-tagging for efficient, effective project management. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312221053_The_Use_of_Mobile_Geotag_Technology_in_Driving_Project_Performance_at_Scale