⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



Global Agendas, Local Realities: Reassessing the Effectiveness of Western‑Driven Policy Frameworks in African Development Context


Authors : Alusine Diamond-Suma

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 7 - July

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/yeywweb3

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/ytt5kzpx

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jul251

Semantic Scholar

ResearchGate

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : This essay interrogates the limitations of universal policy transfer models by examining how the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) travel from Western institutional architectures into the governance realities of the Global South (Sierra Leone as a case). Drawing on policy transfer, translation, and mobility scholarship, it argues that the success of global frameworks does not hinge on similarity between contexts as (Dolowitz and Marsh, 1996) suggest, but on the capacity of domestic actors to reinterpret, hybridise, and embed external ideas within their own political, cultural, and institutional logics. The analysis shows that Sierra Leone’s SDG adoption is shaped by structural constraints, weak data systems, donor-driven incentives, and deep historical legacies, producing incomplete and often misaligned transfers. Yet, the case also reveals meaningful adaptive strategies: localisation through the Sierra Leone Medium-Term National Development Plan (SLMTNDP), consultative voluntary reviews, and hybrid governance arrangements that negotiate global norms with local priorities. Ultimately, the essay positions Sierra Leone as emblematic of wider African experiences where global development agendas collide with and are reshaped by fragile institutions, informal economies, and entrenched social norms. It concludes that policy transfer in such settings is neither linear nor replicative but a contested, negotiated process in which agency, translation, and contextual sensitivity determine outcomes. This reframing contributes to contemporary debates on decolonising global governance and designing development frameworks that recognise complexity rather than impose one-size-fits-all models.

References :

  1. Albrecht, P. (2017) ‘The Hybrid Authority of Sierra Leone’s Chiefs’, African Studies Review, 60(3), pp. 159–180. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/asr.2017.87.
  2. Argote, L. and Ingram, P. (2000) ‘Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), pp. 150–169. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2893.
  3. Benson, D. and Jordan, A. (2011) ‘What have we Learned from Policy Transfer Research? Dolowitz and Marsh Revisited’, Political Studies Review, 9(3), pp. 366–378. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2011.00240.x.
  4. Datzberger, S. and Nguyen, T. (2018) ‘Deconstructing Civil Society Actors and Functions: On the Limitations of International Frameworks for Fragile States’, Social Sciences, 7(2), p. 30. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7020030.
  5. Dolowitz, D. and Marsh, D. (1996) ‘Who Learns What from Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature’, Political Studies, 44(2), pp. 343–357. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00334.x.
  6. Dolowitz, D.P. and Marsh, D. (2000) ‘Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making’, Governance, 13(1), pp. 5–23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.00121.
  7. Escobar, A. (2011) Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press.
  8. Evans, M. (ed.) (2013) New Directions in the Study of Policy Transfer. London: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315868035.
  9. Evans, P. (2004a) ‘Development as institutional change: The pitfalls of monocropping and the potentials of deliberation’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 38(4), pp. 30–52. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686327.
  10. Evans, P. (2004b) ‘Development as institutional change: The pitfalls of monocropping and the potentials of deliberation’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 38(4), pp. 30–52. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686327.
  11. Fioretos, O. and Heldt, E.C. (2019) ‘Legacies and innovations in global economic governance since Bretton Woods’, Review of International Political Economy, 26(6), pp. 1089–1111. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2019.1635513.
  12. Fukuda-Parr, S. and McNeill, D. (2019a) ‘Knowledge and Politics in Setting and Measuring the SDGs: Introduction to Special Issue’, Global Policy, 10(S1), pp. 5–15. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12604.
  13. Fukuda-Parr, S. and McNeill, D. (2019b) ‘Knowledge and Politics in Setting and Measuring the SDGs: Introduction to Special Issue’, Global Policy, 10(S1), pp. 5–15. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12604.
  14. Harrison, G. (2004) The World Bank and Africa: The Construction of Governance States. London: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203500644.
  15. Jerven, M. (2013) Poor Numbers: How We Are Misled by African Development Statistics and What to Do about It. Cornell University Press.
  16. Lendvai, N. and Stubbs, P. (2007) ‘Policies as translation: situating transnational social policies’, Policy reconsidered. Policy Press, pp. 173–190. Available at: https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/display/book/9781847422996/ch010.xml (Accessed: 29 November 2025).
  17. McCann, E. and Ward, K. (2011) Mobile Urbanism: Cities and Policymaking in the Global Age. U of Minnesota Press.
  18. OECD (2025) States of Fragility 2025. OECD Publishing (States of Fragility). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1787/81982370-en.
  19. Phillips, D. and Ochs, K. (2004) Educational Policy Borrowing: historical perspectives. Symposium Books Ltd.
  20. Rose, R. (1991) ‘What is Lesson-Drawing?’, Journal of Public Policy, 11(1), pp. 3–30. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00004918.
  21. Sachs, W. (2019) The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  22. Schneider, A. and Sidney, M. (2009) ‘What Is Next for Policy Design and Social Construction Theory?’, Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), pp. 103–119. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00298.x.
  23. Sindzingre, A.N. (2017) ‘Conditionality as Policy Externalisation: the Inherent Impasses of Asymmetry’, International Initiative for Promoting Political Economy (IIPPE) 8th Conference. [Preprint].
  24. Stone, D. (2012) ‘Transfer and translation of policy’, Policy Studies, 33(6), pp. 483–499. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2012.695933.
  25. Stone, D. (2017) ‘Understanding the transfer of policy failure: bricolage, experimentalism and translation’, Policy & Politics, 45(1), pp. 55–70. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1332/030557316X14748914098041.
  26. Stone, D., Porto De Oliveira, O. and Pal, L.A. (2020) ‘Transnational policy transfer: the circulation of ideas, power and development models’, Policy and Society, 39(1), pp. 1–18. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2019.1619325.
  27. True, J. (2003) ‘Mainstreaming Gender in Global Public Policy’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 5(3), pp. 368–396. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461674032000122740.
  28. Ugyel, L. and Daugbjerg, C. (2020) ‘Successful policy transfer and public sector reform in developing countries’, Policy & Politics, 48(4), pp. 603–618. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1332/030557320X1578663111699.
  29. ‘UN Sierra Leone CPD’ (2024).
  30. UNDP (ed.) (2020) The next frontier: human development and the Anthropocene. New York, NY: United Nations Development Programme (Human development report, 2020).
  31. UNDP (2022) Human Development Report:, UNDP. Available at: https://www.undp.org/sierra-leone/press-releases/2021/2022-human-development-report-9-out-10-countries-fall-backwards-human-development (Accessed: 29 November 2025).
  32. UNDP Sierra Leone (2023) Sierra Leone SDG Investor Map. Available at: https://www.undp.org/sierra-leone/publications/sierra-leone-sdg-investor-map (Accessed: 27 November 2025).
  33. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2023) The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023: Special Edition. United Nations (The Sustainable Development Goals Report). Available at: https://doi.org/10.18356/9789210024914.
  34. Van Wijk, R., Jansen, J.J.P. and Lyles, M.A. (2008) ‘Inter- and Intra-Organizational Knowledge Transfer: A Meta-Analytic Review and Assessment of its Antecedents and Consequences’, Journal of Management Studies, 45(4), pp. 830–853. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00771.x.
  35. Woods, N. (2008) ‘Bretton Woods Institutions’, in S. Daws and T.G. Weiss (eds) The Oxford Handbook on the United Nations. Oxford University Press, p. 0. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199560103.003.0013.
  36. Zaki, B.L., Pattyn, V. and Wayenberg, E. (2024) ‘Policymaking in an age of polycrises: emerging perspectives’, Policy Design and Practice, 7(4), pp. 377–389. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2024.2432048.
  37. Zeigermann, U. and Tulmets, E. (2019) Policy Transfer and Norm Circulation. London: Routledge (Taylor & Francis Group). Available at: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02388278? (Accessed: 29 November 2025).

This essay interrogates the limitations of universal policy transfer models by examining how the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) travel from Western institutional architectures into the governance realities of the Global South (Sierra Leone as a case). Drawing on policy transfer, translation, and mobility scholarship, it argues that the success of global frameworks does not hinge on similarity between contexts as (Dolowitz and Marsh, 1996) suggest, but on the capacity of domestic actors to reinterpret, hybridise, and embed external ideas within their own political, cultural, and institutional logics. The analysis shows that Sierra Leone’s SDG adoption is shaped by structural constraints, weak data systems, donor-driven incentives, and deep historical legacies, producing incomplete and often misaligned transfers. Yet, the case also reveals meaningful adaptive strategies: localisation through the Sierra Leone Medium-Term National Development Plan (SLMTNDP), consultative voluntary reviews, and hybrid governance arrangements that negotiate global norms with local priorities. Ultimately, the essay positions Sierra Leone as emblematic of wider African experiences where global development agendas collide with and are reshaped by fragile institutions, informal economies, and entrenched social norms. It concludes that policy transfer in such settings is neither linear nor replicative but a contested, negotiated process in which agency, translation, and contextual sensitivity determine outcomes. This reframing contributes to contemporary debates on decolonising global governance and designing development frameworks that recognise complexity rather than impose one-size-fits-all models.

Paper Submission Last Date
31 - August - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe