Grammatical Cohesion Conjunction Markers as Binders of Discourse Text Structure


Authors : Subandi Subandi; Prima Devlia Arshanda Putri; Cicik Arista; Urip Zaenal Fanani; Muhammad Farhan Masrur; Iffa Mar’atus Shohibul Birri

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 11 - November


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/davrjr5a

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/4h3v6xsz

DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14292431


Abstract : The cohesion and coherency of a discourse text structure is determined by the correct use of conjunction type grammatical cohesive markers, because these cohesive markers own the function of joining two clauses and sentences. The use of these conjunction type grammatical cohesive markers can also be found on Mandarin essay text written by the students of Mandarin Language Education Study Program, State University of Surabaya class of 2021. There are three types of conjunctions used in the essay written by students, which are, conjunction categorized as additive as a marker equivalent relationship is actualized by using the preposition 和 hé (and) as well as the use of preposition 也 yě (also, too) to indicate a relationship of emphasis and/or equality towards its parts. Category of clause conjunction is a category which plays the role to bind a cause-and-effect relationship, indicated by the use of preposition 因为 yīnwéi (because) as an indicator of cause and there is an annihilation on the indicator of effect or result, preposition 所以 suǒyǐ (so, therefore) as an indicator of effect or result and occurs an omission of the cause indicator, the preposition 当然 dāngrán (of course, certainly/absolutely) as a result indicator that does not require a cause preposition, and the use of preposition 因 为 yīnwéi (because)... 所 以 suǒyǐ (so, therefore) a standard form of casual relationship indicator/marker. And adversative category conjunctions are marked by the existent of preposition 不仅 bùjǐn (not only)... 而且 érqiě (but also), the use of preposition 而不仅仅因为 ér bùjǐn jǐn yīnwèi (not only because), preposition 但 是 dànshì (but), and also preposition 尽管...但是 jǐnguǎn... dànshì (although... but) which marks and indicates a characteristic of conflict and denial relationship.

Keywords : Cohesion Markers, Grammatical Cohesion, Conjunctions, Structural Integration, Discourse Texts.

References :

  1. Abdussamad, Z. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif (P. Rapanna (ed.)). Makassar: CV. Syakir Media Press.
  2. Aisya, S. (2018). Kohesi Gramatikal Dan Leksikal Pada Pidato Malala Yousafzai:“the Pen Is Mightier Than the Sword.” Jurnal Elektronik Fakultas Sastra …, 1–15. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/jefs/article/view/20404
  3. Ardiyanti, D., & Setyorini, R. (2019). Kohesi Gramatikal dan Kohesi Leksikal dalam Cerita Anak Berjudul “Buku Mini Dea” Karya Watiek Ideo dan Yuli Rahmawati. SeBaSa, 2(1), 7–13. http://e-journal.hamzanwadi.ac.id/index.php/sbs/article/view/1347/776
  4. Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik (Cetakan ke). Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
  5. Arista, C., Masrur, M. F., Dasion, H. Y. T., Subandi, S., Adimas, Y. B., & Aditya, R. (2023). Elements of Cohesion and Coherence in Chinese Narrative Discourse Texts in Newspapers Guoji Ribao. 1, 2102–2115. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-008-4_225
  6. Arista, C., & Subandi. (2020). Analysis of Language Errors at the Level of Syntax in Writing Free Discourse Text. 491(Ijcah), 714–721. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201201.121
  7. Ashari, A. D., Khasanah, I. M., & Hanifah, S. (2019). Analisis Kohesi Gramatikal Dalam Berita Online Cnnindonesia.Com pada Rubrik Nasional Edisi Oktober 2019. Caraka, 6(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.30738/.v6i1.6596
  8. Awar, N., Daeng, K., & Nensilianti. (2020). Kohesi Gramatikal Teks Berita Olahraga pada Surat Kabar Harian Fajar Makassar. 1–20. http://eprints.unm.ac.id/16679/
  9. Aziz, A. (2022). Kohesi Gramatikal (Tamasuk Nahwi) Aplikasi Substitusi dan Elipsis pada Wacana Ayat Al-Quran. Mumtaz: Jurnal Studi Al-Quran Dan Keislaman, 5(02), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.36671/mumtaz.v5i02.210
  10. Barru, F. (2017). Analisis Kohesi Kumpulan Puisi Karya Emha Ainun Nadjib. Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 6(3), 261–275. https://journal.student.uny.ac.id/ojs/index.php/bsi/article/view/7950
  11. Chaer, A. (2014). Linguistik Umum (Edisi Revi). Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
  12. Darmawati. (2021). Analisis Kohesi dan Koherensi Karangan Mahasiswa Informatika Kelas 1D Universitas Cokroaminoto Palopo. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, Dan Sastra, 7(1), 295–306. https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v7i1.1183
  13. Dhieni, N., & Fridani, L. (2007). Hakikat Perkembangan Bahasa Anak (Modul 1 PAUD). 1–28. https://pustaka.ut.ac.id/lib/wp-content/uploads/pdfmk/PAUD4106-M1.pdf
  14. Dini, C. F., Anindyarini, A., & Rahmat. (2022). Analisis Kohesi leksiAbdussamad, Z. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif (P. Rapanna (ed.)). Makassar: CV. Syakir Media Press.
  15. Aisya, S. (2018). Kohesi Gramatikal Dan Leksikal Pada Pidato Malala Yousafzai:“the Pen Is Mightier Than the Sword.” Jurnal Elektronik Fakultas Sastra …, 1–15. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/jefs/article/view/20404
  16. Ardiyanti, D., & Setyorini, R. (2019). Kohesi Gramatikal dan Kohesi Leksikal dalam Cerita Anak Berjudul “Buku Mini Dea” Karya Watiek Ideo dan Yuli Rahmawati. SeBaSa, 2(1), 7–13. http://e-journal.hamzanwadi.ac.id/index.php/sbs/article/view/1347/776
  17. Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik (Cetakan ke). Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
  18. Arista, C., Masrur, M. F., Dasion, H. Y. T., Subandi, S., Adimas, Y. B., & Aditya, R. (2023). Elements of Cohesion and Coherence in Chinese Narrative Discourse Texts in Newspapers Guoji Ribao. 1, 2102–2115. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-008-4_225
  19. Arista, C., & Subandi. (2020). Analysis of Language Errors at the Level of Syntax in Writing Free Discourse Text. 491(Ijcah), 714–721. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201201.121
  20. Ashari, A. D., Khasanah, I. M., & Hanifah, S. (2019). Analisis Kohesi Gramatikal Dalam Berita Online Cnnindonesia.Com pada Rubrik Nasional Edisi Oktober 2019. Caraka, 6(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.30738/.v6i1.6596
  21. Awar, N., Daeng, K., & Nensilianti. (2020). Kohesi Gramatikal Teks Berita Olahraga pada Surat Kabar Harian Fajar Makassar. 1–20. http://eprints.unm.ac.id/16679/
  22. Aziz, A. (2022). Kohesi Gramatikal (Tamasuk Nahwi) Aplikasi Substitusi dan Elipsis pada Wacana Ayat Al-Quran. Mumtaz: Jurnal Studi Al-Quran Dan Keislaman, 5(02), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.36671/mumtaz.v5i02.210
  23. Barru, F. (2017). Analisis Kohesi Kumpulan Puisi Karya Emha Ainun Nadjib. Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 6(3), 261–275. https://journal.student.uny.ac.id/ojs/index.php/bsi/article/view/7950
  24. Chaer, A. (2014). Linguistik Umum (Edisi Revi). Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
  25. Darmawati. (2021). Analisis Kohesi dan Koherensi Karangan Mahasiswa Informatika Kelas 1D Universitas Cokroaminoto Palopo. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, Dan Sastra, 7(1), 295–306. https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v7i1.1183
  26. Dhieni, N., & Fridani, L. (2007). Hakikat Perkembangan Bahasa Anak (Modul 1 PAUD). 1–28. https://pustaka.ut.ac.id/lib/wp-content/uploads/pdfmk/PAUD4106-M1.pdf
  27. Dini, C. F., Anindyarini, A., & Rahmat. (2022). Analisis Kohesi leksikal dalam Wacana Berita Olahraga Majalah Panjebar Semangat Tahun 2019. Sabdasastra: Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Budaya Jawa, 6(1), 152–169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20961/sabpbj.v6i1.65217
  28. Djadjasudarma, F. (2017). Wacana dan Pragmatik (R. Novitasari (ed.); 2017th ed.). Bandung: Refika Aditama.
  29. Dwinuryati, Y., Andayani, A., & Winarni, R. (2018). Analisis Kohesi Gramatikal dan Leksikal pada Teks Eksposisi Siswa Kelas 10 Sekolah Menengah Atas. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 8(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2018.v8.i1.p61-69
  30. Fitri, L., & Safira, N. (2020). Aalisis Penggunan Kohesi dan Koherensi Karangan Eksposisi Siswa Kelas X SMK Negeri 2 Padang Panjang. Inovasi Pendidikan: Jurnal Pendidikan, 7(1), 31–38. https://jurnal.umsb.ac.id/index.php/inovasipendidikan/article/view/2239
  31. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman Group Limited London.
  32. Hermaditoyo, S., & Firna, I. (2019). Kesalahan Kohesi dan Koherensi dalam Teks Eksplanasi Siwa Kelas IX SMPN 11 RUTENG 1 Stanislaus. Prollitera Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Budaya, 2(1), 21–30. https://jurnal.unikastpaulus.ac.id/index.php/jp/article/view/1620
  33. Hermansyah. (2019). Penggunaan Unsur Referensi Dalam Wacana Politik Pada Surat Kabar Banjarmasin Post Edisi Februari 2017 ( the Use of Reference Elements in Political Discourse on the Newspaper of Banjarmasin Post February 2017 Edition ). Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra Dan Pembelajarannya, 9(2), 150–155. https://ppjp.ulm.ac.id/journal/index.php/jbsp/article/view/7479
  34. Itaristanti. (2016). Aspek Kohesi dan Koherensi dalam Penulisan Karangan Deskripsi yang Disusun oleh Pembelajar BIPA (Studi Kasus Mahasiswa Thammasat University, Bangkok pada Program SEA-GATE UGM 2016). Journal Indonesian Language Education and Literature, 2(1), 88–105. https://www.syekhnurjati.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/jeill/article/view/1104
  35. Izar, J., Afria, R., & Sanjaya, D. (2019). Analisis Aspek Gramatikal dan Leksikal pada Cerpen Ketek Ijo Karya M. Fajar Kusuma. Titian: Jurnal Ilmu Humaniora, 3(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.22437/titian.v3i1.7026
  36. Karadeniz, A. (2017). Cohesion and Coherence in Written Texts of Students of Faculty of Education. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(2), 93. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i2.1998
  37. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. In M. H. S. Jill (Ed.), Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781
  38. Lestari, R. (2019). Kohesi dan Koherensi Paragraf dalam Karangan Mahasiswa Teknik Angkatan 2017 Universitas PGRI Banyuwangi. Jurnall Ilmiah Bahasa Dan Sastra Kredo, 03(1), 73–82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24176/kredo.v3i1.3924
  39. Mahajani, T., Suhendra, S., & Nurlihayati, N. (2021). Analisis Penggunaan Kohesi Gramatikal pada Teks Eksplanasi Siswa Kelas Viii SMP Negeri 5 Bogor. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran Guru Sekolah Dasar (JPPGuseda), 4(2), 97–102. https://doi.org/10.55215/jppguseda.v4i2.3609
  40. Maharani, W. (2018). Kohesi dan Koherensi Teks Bacaan dalam Buku Bahasa Indonesia Kelas XII Semester 2. Repositori Institusi, 1–19. https://kbi.kemdikbud.go.id/kbi_back/file/dokumen_makalah/dokumen_makalah_1540524188.pdf
  41. Mahsun, M. S. (2017). Metode Penelitian Bahasa (Cetakan ke). Depok: Rajawali Pers.
  42. Mamik. (2015). Metodologi Kualitatif. In M. K. Dr. M. Choiroel Anwar, SKM (Ed.), Zifatama Publisher.Sidoarjo:  Zifatama Publisher. https://medium.com/@arifwicaksanaa/pengertian-use-case-a7e576e1b6bf
  43. Masrukhin, H. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. In Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952. Kudus: Media Ilmu Press.
  44. Masrur, M. F., & Subandi. (2020). The Implementation of Mentoring Learning Model to Build Mandarin Basic Sentence Writing Skill. 491(Ijcah), 730–737. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201201.123
  45. Miles, M. B. dan Huberman, A. M. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, Third Edition. Arizona State University: SAGE Publications.
  46. Moleong, L. J. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
  47. Mujianto, G. (2017). Piranti Kohesi Dalam Wacana Tulis Guru Sma/Smk Muhammadiyah Kabupaten Malang. KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 3(2), 210–233.
  48. Mulyana. (2005). Kajian Wacana. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
  49. Nafilah, I., Rokhayati, R., Jayanti, M. D., Studi, P., & Bahasa, P. (2019). Kohesi dan Koherensi dalam Karangan Siswa Kelas VI Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Ash-Sholahiyah Depok Jawa Barat. Wacana: Jurnal Bahasa, Seni, Dan Pengajaran, 3(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29407/jbsp.v3i1.13644
  50. Noermanzah. (2019). Bahasa sebagai Alat Komunikasi, Citra Pikiran, dan Kepribadian. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Bulan Bahasa (Semiba), 306–319. https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/semiba/article/view/11151/5537
  51. Pengxia, C., Duanhuiqiong, Chen, & He. (2021). 短篇小接研究. Linguistik Sciscan Publishing Limited, 3, 535–543. https://www.sciscanpub.com/uploads/2021/12/20/lin20211044v3.pdf
  52. Pernando, E., & Rahima, A. (2017). Analisis Kohesi Leksikal dalam Majalah Patriotik Lpm Universitas Batanghari Edisi Xvi Juli-September Tahun 2016. Aksara: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 1(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.33087/aksara.v1i1.3
  53. Rahmadi. (2011). Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian. In Syahrani (Ed.), Antasari Press. Antasari Press. https://idr.uin-antasari.ac.id/10670/1/PENGANTAR METODOLOGI PENELITIAN.pdf
  54. Rijali, A. (2018). Analisis Data Kualitatif. Alhadharah: Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah, 17(33), 81. https://doi.org/10.18592/alhadharah.v17i33.2374
  55. Sanajaya, S., Saragih, G., & Restoeningroem, R. (2020). Kohesi Gramatikal dan Kohesi Leksikal dalam Kumpulan Cerpen Konvensi Karya A. Mustofa Bisri. Diskursus: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, 3(03), 261–267. https://doi.org/10.30998/diskursus.v3i03.8230
  56. Sandu Siyoto, & Sodik, M. A. (2015). Dasar Metodologi Penelitian. In Ayup (Ed.), Dasar Metodologi Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Literasi Media Publishing.
  57. Sinambela, K., Simanjuntak, T., & Telaumbanua, S. (2019). Aspek Kohesi Gramatikal dan Leksikal pada Karangan Eksposisi Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Laguboti Kabupaten Toba Samosir T.A 2018\2019. Jurnal Genre (Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pembelajarannya), 1(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.26555/jg.v1i1.1054
  58. Subandi, S., Arista, C., Aditya, R., Masrur, MF. (2020). Project-Based Learning Model as an Alternative Learning to Build Student’s Writing Skill. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Arts and Humanities (IJCAH 2020) Vol. 491. 722-729. Atlantis Press. https://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201201.122
  59. Subandi, S., Damayanti, D., Masrur, M. F., Arista, C., & Adimas, Y. (2022). Keterpaduan Gagasan pada Teks Wacana Naratif (Analisis Teks Wacana Naratif Berbahasa Mandarin). Paramasastra, 9(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.26740/paramasastra.v9n1.p53-69
  60. Subandi, S., Nurhadi, D., Hartanti, L. P., & Mael, M. R. (2022). The ideological resistance of Japan’s Kamikaze pilots in a book entitled Kike Wadatsumi no Koe. In Innovation on Education and Social Sciences (pp. 224–232). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003265061
  61. Subandi, S., Renfei, X., & Wibisono, G. (2020). The Error Analysis of Narrative Text on Mandarin Discourse Case Study of Indonesian Students in China. Atlantis Press. Https://Dx. Doi. Org/10.2991/Assehr. K, 201201(125), 747–754.
  62. Sugiyono, P. D. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (Cetakan ke). Bandung: ALFABETA.
  63. Sumarlam, Saddhono, K., Usdiyanto, Widyastuti, C. S., Muljani, S., Tarwiyah, S., Prayitno, H., Darmini, W., Pudiyono, & Haryono, P. (2003). Teori dan Praktk Analisis Wacana (Sumarlam (ed.); cetakan 2). Surakarta: Pustaka Cakra.
  64. Sumarno. (2019). Analisis Isi dalam Penelitian Pembelajaran Bahasa dan Sastra. Jurnal Umko, 2, 37–55.
  65. Telaumbanua, A. (2023). Analisis Unsur Kohesi dan Koherensi dalam Karangan Eksposisi yang Ditulis oleh Siswa Kelas VII SMP Negeri 4 Mazo T.A 2021/2022. Kohesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 3(2), 44–55. https://jurnal.uniraya.ac.id/index.php/Kohesi/article/view/866
  66. Umaiyah, N. (2016). Kohesi Gramatikal dan Leksikal dalam Berita di Rubrik Daerah DIY pada Situs Berita Online Sindonews.com. Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 5(5), 1–15. https://journal.student.uny.ac.id/ojs/index.php/bsi/article/view/3560/3246
  67. Unga Waeu, D. S., Junaeny, A., Sukma, S., & Nirdayanti, N. (2022). Kemampuan Menulis Karangan Bahasa Mandarin Mahasiswa di Kota Makassar. Jurnal Cakrawala Mandarin, 6(2), 185. https://doi.org/10.36279/apsmi.v6i2.207
  68. Wiyanti, E. (2016). Kajian Kohesi Gramatikal Substitusi dan Elipsis dalam Novel “Laskar Pelangi” Karya Andrea Hirata. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 16(2), 188. https://doi.org/10.17509/bs_jpbsp.v16i2.4481
  69. Yanti, D., Sulastriana, E., & Melia. (2020). Analisis Kohesi Leksikal pada Karangan Cerpen Siswa Kelas XI IPS SMA Immanuel Sintang (Analisis Wacana). EduIndo: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 1(2), 1–15. https://jurnal.fpbs.ikippgriptk.ac.id/index.php/eduindo/article/view/40
  70. Zaim. M. (2014). Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Pendekatan Struktural. In Sukabina Press (Vol. 14). http://repository.unp.ac.id/id/eprint/1830
  71. kal dalam Wacana Berita Olahraga Majalah Panjebar Semangat Tahun 2019. Sabdasastra: Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Budaya Jawa, 6(1), 152–169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20961/sabpbj.v6i1.65217
  72. Djadjasudarma, F. (2017). Wacana dan Pragmatik (R. Novitasari (ed.); 2017th ed.). Bandung: Refika Aditama.
  73. Dwinuryati, Y., Andayani, A., & Winarni, R. (2018). Analisis Kohesi Gramatikal dan Leksikal pada Teks Eksposisi Siswa Kelas 10 Sekolah Menengah Atas. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 8(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2018.v8.i1.p61-69
  74. Fitri, L., & Safira, N. (2020). Aalisis Penggunan Kohesi dan Koherensi Karangan Eksposisi Siswa Kelas X SMK Negeri 2 Padang Panjang. Inovasi Pendidikan: Jurnal Pendidikan, 7(1), 31–38. https://jurnal.umsb.ac.id/index.php/inovasipendidikan/article/view/2239
  75. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman Group Limited London.
  76. Hermaditoyo, S., & Firna, I. (2019). Kesalahan Kohesi dan Koherensi dalam Teks Eksplanasi Siwa Kelas IX SMPN 11 RUTENG 1 Stanislaus. Prollitera Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Budaya, 2(1), 21–30. https://jurnal.unikastpaulus.ac.id/index.php/jp/article/view/1620
  77. Hermansyah. (2019). Penggunaan Unsur Referensi Dalam Wacana Politik Pada Surat Kabar Banjarmasin Post Edisi Februari 2017 ( the Use of Reference Elements in Political Discourse on the Newspaper of Banjarmasin Post February 2017 Edition ). Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra Dan Pembelajarannya, 9(2), 150–155. https://ppjp.ulm.ac.id/journal/index.php/jbsp/article/view/7479
  78. Itaristanti. (2016). Aspek Kohesi dan Koherensi dalam Penulisan Karangan Deskripsi yang Disusun oleh Pembelajar BIPA (Studi Kasus Mahasiswa Thammasat University, Bangkok pada Program SEA-GATE UGM 2016). Journal Indonesian Language Education and Literature, 2(1), 88–105. https://www.syekhnurjati.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/jeill/article/view/1104
  79. Izar, J., Afria, R., & Sanjaya, D. (2019). Analisis Aspek Gramatikal dan Leksikal pada Cerpen Ketek Ijo Karya M. Fajar Kusuma. Titian: Jurnal Ilmu Humaniora, 3(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.22437/titian.v3i1.7026
  80. Karadeniz, A. (2017). Cohesion and Coherence in Written Texts of Students of Faculty of Education. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(2), 93. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i2.1998
  81. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. In M. H. S. Jill (Ed.), Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781
  82. Lestari, R. (2019). Kohesi dan Koherensi Paragraf dalam Karangan Mahasiswa Teknik Angkatan 2017 Universitas PGRI Banyuwangi. Jurnall Ilmiah Bahasa Dan Sastra Kredo, 03(1), 73–82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24176/kredo.v3i1.3924
  83. Mahajani, T., Suhendra, S., & Nurlihayati, N. (2021). Analisis Penggunaan Kohesi Gramatikal pada Teks Eksplanasi Siswa Kelas Viii SMP Negeri 5 Bogor. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran Guru Sekolah Dasar (JPPGuseda), 4(2), 97–102. https://doi.org/10.55215/jppguseda.v4i2.3609
  84. Maharani, W. (2018). Kohesi dan Koherensi Teks Bacaan dalam Buku Bahasa Indonesia Kelas XII Semester 2. Repositori Institusi, 1–19. https://kbi.kemdikbud.go.id/kbi_back/file/dokumen_makalah/dokumen_makalah_1540524188.pdf
  85. Mahsun, M. S. (2017). Metode Penelitian Bahasa (Cetakan ke). Depok: Rajawali Pers.
  86. Mamik. (2015). Metodologi Kualitatif. In M. K. Dr. M. Choiroel Anwar, SKM (Ed.), Zifatama Publisher.Sidoarjo:  Zifatama Publisher. https://medium.com/@arifwicaksanaa/pengertian-use-case-a7e576e1b6bf
  87. Masrukhin, H. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. In Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952. Kudus: Media Ilmu Press.
  88. Masrur, M. F., & Subandi. (2020). The Implementation of Mentoring Learning Model to Build Mandarin Basic Sentence Writing Skill. 491(Ijcah), 730–737. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201201.123
  89. Miles, M. B. dan Huberman, A. M. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, Third Edition. Arizona State University: SAGE Publications.
  90. Moleong, L. J. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
  91. Mujianto, G. (2017). Piranti Kohesi Dalam Wacana Tulis Guru Sma/Smk Muhammadiyah Kabupaten Malang. KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 3(2), 210–233.
  92. Mulyana. (2005). Kajian Wacana. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
  93. Nafilah, I., Rokhayati, R., Jayanti, M. D., Studi, P., & Bahasa, P. (2019). Kohesi dan Koherensi dalam Karangan Siswa Kelas VI Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Ash-Sholahiyah Depok Jawa Barat. Wacana: Jurnal Bahasa, Seni, Dan Pengajaran, 3(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29407/jbsp.v3i1.13644
  94. Noermanzah. (2019). Bahasa sebagai Alat Komunikasi, Citra Pikiran, dan Kepribadian. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Bulan Bahasa (Semiba), 306–319. https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/semiba/article/view/11151/5537
  95. Pengxia, C., Duanhuiqiong, Chen, & He. (2021). 短篇小接研究. Linguistik Sciscan Publishing Limited, 3, 535–543. https://www.sciscanpub.com/uploads/2021/12/20/lin20211044v3.pdf
  96. Pernando, E., & Rahima, A. (2017). Analisis Kohesi Leksikal dalam Majalah Patriotik Lpm Universitas Batanghari Edisi Xvi Juli-September Tahun 2016. Aksara: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 1(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.33087/aksara.v1i1.3
  97. Rahmadi. (2011). Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian. In Syahrani (Ed.), Antasari Press. Antasari Press. https://idr.uin-antasari.ac.id/10670/1/PENGANTAR METODOLOGI PENELITIAN.pdf
  98. Rijali, A. (2018). Analisis Data Kualitatif. Alhadharah: Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah, 17(33), 81. https://doi.org/10.18592/alhadharah.v17i33.2374
  99. Sanajaya, S., Saragih, G., & Restoeningroem, R. (2020). Kohesi Gramatikal dan Kohesi Leksikal dalam Kumpulan Cerpen Konvensi Karya A. Mustofa Bisri. Diskursus: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, 3(03), 261–267. https://doi.org/10.30998/diskursus.v3i03.8230
  100. Sandu Siyoto, & Sodik, M. A. (2015). Dasar Metodologi Penelitian. In Ayup (Ed.), Dasar Metodologi Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Literasi Media Publishing.
  101. Sinambela, K., Simanjuntak, T., & Telaumbanua, S. (2019). Aspek Kohesi Gramatikal dan Leksikal pada Karangan Eksposisi Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Laguboti Kabupaten Toba Samosir T.A 2018\2019. Jurnal Genre (Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pembelajarannya), 1(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.26555/jg.v1i1.1054
  102. Subandi, S., Arista, C., Aditya, R., Masrur, MF. (2020). Project-Based Learning Model as an Alternative Learning to Build Student’s Writing Skill. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Arts and Humanities (IJCAH 2020) Vol. 491. 722-729. Atlantis Press. https://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201201.122
  103. Subandi, S., Damayanti, D., Masrur, M. F., Arista, C., & Adimas, Y. (2022). Keterpaduan Gagasan pada Teks Wacana Naratif (Analisis Teks Wacana Naratif Berbahasa Mandarin). Paramasastra, 9(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.26740/paramasastra.v9n1.p53-69
  104. Subandi, S., Nurhadi, D., Hartanti, L. P., & Mael, M. R. (2022). The ideological resistance of Japan’s Kamikaze pilots in a book entitled Kike Wadatsumi no Koe. In Innovation on Education and Social Sciences (pp. 224–232). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003265061
  105. Subandi, S., Renfei, X., & Wibisono, G. (2020). The Error Analysis of Narrative Text on Mandarin Discourse Case Study of Indonesian Students in China. Atlantis Press. Https://Dx. Doi. Org/10.2991/Assehr. K, 201201(125), 747–754.
  106. Sugiyono, P. D. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (Cetakan ke). Bandung: ALFABETA.
  107. Sumarlam, Saddhono, K., Usdiyanto, Widyastuti, C. S., Muljani, S., Tarwiyah, S., Prayitno, H., Darmini, W., Pudiyono, & Haryono, P. (2003). Teori dan Praktk Analisis Wacana (Sumarlam (ed.); cetakan 2). Surakarta: Pustaka Cakra.
  108. Sumarno. (2019). Analisis Isi dalam Penelitian Pembelajaran Bahasa dan Sastra. Jurnal Umko, 2, 37–55.
  109. Telaumbanua, A. (2023). Analisis Unsur Kohesi dan Koherensi dalam Karangan Eksposisi yang Ditulis oleh Siswa Kelas VII SMP Negeri 4 Mazo T.A 2021/2022. Kohesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 3(2), 44–55. https://jurnal.uniraya.ac.id/index.php/Kohesi/article/view/866
  110. Umaiyah, N. (2016). Kohesi Gramatikal dan Leksikal dalam Berita di Rubrik Daerah DIY pada Situs Berita Online Sindonews.com. Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 5(5), 1–15. https://journal.student.uny.ac.id/ojs/index.php/bsi/article/view/3560/3246
  111. Unga Waeu, D. S., Junaeny, A., Sukma, S., & Nirdayanti, N. (2022). Kemampuan Menulis Karangan Bahasa Mandarin Mahasiswa di Kota Makassar. Jurnal Cakrawala Mandarin, 6(2), 185. https://doi.org/10.36279/apsmi.v6i2.207
  112. Wiyanti, E. (2016). Kajian Kohesi Gramatikal Substitusi dan Elipsis dalam Novel “Laskar Pelangi” Karya Andrea Hirata. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 16(2), 188. https://doi.org/10.17509/bs_jpbsp.v16i2.4481
  113. Yanti, D., Sulastriana, E., & Melia. (2020). Analisis Kohesi Leksikal pada Karangan Cerpen Siswa Kelas XI IPS SMA Immanuel Sintang (Analisis Wacana). EduIndo: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 1(2), 1–15. https://jurnal.fpbs.ikippgriptk.ac.id/index.php/eduindo/article/view/40
  114. Zaim. M. (2014). Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Pendekatan Struktural. In Sukabina Press (Vol. 14). http://repository.unp.ac.id/id/eprint/1830

The cohesion and coherency of a discourse text structure is determined by the correct use of conjunction type grammatical cohesive markers, because these cohesive markers own the function of joining two clauses and sentences. The use of these conjunction type grammatical cohesive markers can also be found on Mandarin essay text written by the students of Mandarin Language Education Study Program, State University of Surabaya class of 2021. There are three types of conjunctions used in the essay written by students, which are, conjunction categorized as additive as a marker equivalent relationship is actualized by using the preposition 和 hé (and) as well as the use of preposition 也 yě (also, too) to indicate a relationship of emphasis and/or equality towards its parts. Category of clause conjunction is a category which plays the role to bind a cause-and-effect relationship, indicated by the use of preposition 因为 yīnwéi (because) as an indicator of cause and there is an annihilation on the indicator of effect or result, preposition 所以 suǒyǐ (so, therefore) as an indicator of effect or result and occurs an omission of the cause indicator, the preposition 当然 dāngrán (of course, certainly/absolutely) as a result indicator that does not require a cause preposition, and the use of preposition 因 为 yīnwéi (because)... 所 以 suǒyǐ (so, therefore) a standard form of casual relationship indicator/marker. And adversative category conjunctions are marked by the existent of preposition 不仅 bùjǐn (not only)... 而且 érqiě (but also), the use of preposition 而不仅仅因为 ér bùjǐn jǐn yīnwèi (not only because), preposition 但 是 dànshì (but), and also preposition 尽管...但是 jǐnguǎn... dànshì (although... but) which marks and indicates a characteristic of conflict and denial relationship.

Keywords : Cohesion Markers, Grammatical Cohesion, Conjunctions, Structural Integration, Discourse Texts.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe